Comparison of Propofol Based Versus Volatile Based Anesthesia and Postoperative Sedation
Comparison of Propofol Based Anesthesia and Postoperative Sedation (PA) Versus Volatile Anesthetics Based Anesthesia and Postoperative Sedation (VA) in Cardiac Surgical Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
146
1 country
1
Brief Summary
All patients undergoing cardiac surgery require intraoperative anesthesia and short-term postoperative sedation with anesthetic agents after the procedure when patient is in the intensive care unit (ICU). The clinical data obtained so far are concentrating on intraoperative use volatile agents (preconditioning) resulting in better postoperative cardiac function and less release of biochemical markers of myocardial damage. There are no studies investigating whether postoperative use of volatile agents (post conditioning) in cardiac surgical population is improving outcomes. The aim of the present study is to compare total intravenous anesthesia and postoperative sedation versus total volatile anesthesia and postoperative sedation in cardiac surgical population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedFebruary 12, 2014
February 1, 2014
2.3 years
May 17, 2010
February 11, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The composite primary end point of the trial will be the development of enzymatic signs of myocardial injury or MI, postoperative low output syndrome, or both. Enzymatic MI will be determined after obtaining serial measurements of troponin.
Measurements of troponin levels will be after induction of anesthesia (baseline) and at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after arrival into the ICU.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quality of sedation
Post ICU arrival POD 0 to discharge (2hours to on average 5-7 days until discharge)
Incidence of delirium
Post ICU arrival POD 0 to discharge (2hours to on average 5-7 days until discharge)
Time to readiness for extubation, time to extubation
Post ICU arrival POD 0 to discharge (2hours to on average 5-7 days until discharge)
Length of stay within ICU, readiness for discharge from the unit
Post ICU arrival POD 0 to discharge (2hours to on average 5-7 days until discharge)
Study Arms (2)
PA-Intravenous Sedation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropofol based total intravenous anesthesia and postoperative sedation
Volatile sedation
ACTIVE COMPARATORTotal inhalational anesthesia and postoperative sedation with the AnaConda device
Interventions
Volatile for sedation in the CVICU while intubated
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery with good ventricular function (grade 1-2 ventricle)
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing valvular surgery
- Severe kidney or liver disease (creatinine \> 2.5mg.dL-1 and bilirubin \> 2 mg.dL-1)
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the trial drugs (propofol, volatile anesthetics), e.g. propofol allergy or malignant hyperthermia (induced by volatile anesthetics)
- Patient with poorly controlled diabetes or on oral anti-diabetic medication (inhibit preconditioning caused by volatile anesthetics)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Toronto General Hopsital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Wasowicz M, Jerath A, Luksun W, Sharma V, Mitsakakis N, Meineri M, Katznelson R, Yau T, Rao V, Beattie WS. Comparison of propofol-based versus volatile-based anaesthesia and postoperative sedation in cardiac surgical patients: a prospective, randomized, study. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2018;50(3):200-209. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2018.0012. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
PMID: 29913033DERIVEDPickworth T, Jerath A, DeVine R, Kherani N, Wasowicz M. The scavenging of volatile anesthetic agents in the cardiovascular intensive care unit environment: a technical report. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;60(1):38-43. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9814-5. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
PMID: 23132045DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcin Wasowicz, MD
Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2010
First Posted
June 28, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 12, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02