NCT01539382

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether keeping the amount of oxygen delivered to the brain above a certain level during surgery and 24-hours after surgery improves recovery. Hypothesis 1: keeping the amount of oxygen delivered to the brain above a certain level during surgery and 24-hours after surgery improves cognitive and neurological outcomes after cardiac and aortic surgery. Hypothesis 2: keeping the amount of oxygen delivered to the brain above a certain level during surgery and 24-hours after surgery helps reduce major organ problems after cardiac and aortic surgery. To test our hypotheses, the investigators will conduct a randomized control trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two possible study groups. In the Treatment Group, the brain oxygen level will be watched by doctors and used to guide care in the operating room and the first day in the intensive care unit after surgery. Doctors will try to keep the brain oxygen level in a normal range by adjusting your blood pressure, carbon dioxide and blood acidity levels, and blood count. In the Control Group, the doctors will not be aware of the brain oxygen level unless it falls below a level that may be dangerous. If a patient's brain oxygen falls below such a level, the doctors will adjust the blood pressure, carbon dioxide and blood acidity levels, and blood count to increase the brain oxygen level. All other procedures will be part of regular medical care and will be performed according to the standard of care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 21, 2012

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 27, 2012

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2015

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

February 21, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 22, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

cardiac surgeryneurocognitive assessmentneurocognitive function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Postoperative neurocognitive decline

    Postoperative cognitive deficit as defined as negative changes in Z-score of greater than or equal to 1.0 in any of the four neurocognitive domains tested by neurocognitive assessment (Response Speed, Processing Speed, Attention, and Memory).

    Baseline (before surgery)

  • Postoperative neurocognitive decline

    Postoperative cognitive deficit as defined as negative changes in Z-score of greater than or equal to 1.0 in any of the four neurocognitive domains tested by neurocognitive assessment (Response Speed, Processing Speed, Attention, and Memory).

    3 months after surgery

  • Postoperative neurocognitive decline

    Postoperative cognitive deficit as defined as negative changes in Z-score of greater than or equal to 1.0 in any of the four neurocognitive domains tested by neurocognitive assessment (Response Speed, Processing Speed, Attention, and Memory).

    6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Neurological dysfunction

    During the hospitalization for postoperative recovery, average 8 days

  • Multiple organ dysfunction

    During the hospitalization for postoperative recovery, average 8 days

Study Arms (2)

Cerebral oxygenation intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Cerebral oxygenation levels for people in this group will be monitored and maintained above 60%. If levels decrease to below 60%, a protocol is followed to guide possible interventions to increase cerebral oxygenation levels above 60%

Procedure: Cerebral oxygenation intervention

Cerebral oxygenation control

NO INTERVENTION

Cerebral oxygenation levels for people in this group will be masked and thus doctors and care staff will not use the cerebral oxygenation levels to make any interventions. If the cerebral oxygenation levels drop to below 40%, the cerebral oxygenation levels will be unmasked so that doctors can follow the protocol to increase levels to above 60%.

Interventions

The protocol for interventions to increase cerebral oxygenation levels above 60% optimizing pH, PaO2, PaCO2, bispectral index, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, venous oxygen saturation, and hematocrit. In addition, cerebral perfusion pressure of 70-80 mm Hg and flow \>2.0 l/min/m2 will be maintained during cardiopulmonary bypass. In the ICU, temperatures will be maintained below 38 degrees by administering antipyretics or cooling, and dexmedetomidine will be used if the patient is agitated.

Also known as: Intervention
Cerebral oxygenation intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients scheduled to undergo elective cardiac or thoracic aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe preoperative cognitive impairment (i.e., dementia or developmental intellectual disability)
  • Sensory or motor impairment that would preclude reliable operation of a computer and keyboard
  • Lack of access to use computer-based cognitive evaluation
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • Renal failure requiring dialysis
  • Respiratory failure requiring home oxygen use
  • Child's B or C hepatic failure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, 10029, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Methods

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Muoi Trinh, MD

    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2012

First Posted

February 27, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 23, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-10

Locations