NCT01032135

Brief Summary

  • Hypothesis 1: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce higher rates of treatment engagement than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (e.g., MI-IOP).
  • Hypothesis 2: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce better cocaine/alcohol use outcomes than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (MI-IOP).
  • Secondary analysis 1: Among the Non-engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
  • Secondary analysis 2: Among the Engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
  • Primary objective #2: Determine whether the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC varies as a function of engagement group, with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes over weeks 1-24.
  • Hypothesis 1: The predicted main effect on retention favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
  • Hypothesis 2: The predicted main effect on cocaine/alcohol use outcomes favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2008

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 15, 2009

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 15, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

5.2 years

First QC Date

December 14, 2009

Results QC Date

March 28, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (30)

  • Treatment Engagement

    Number of treatment sessions attended

    weeks 3 - 12

  • Treatment Engagement for Participants Engaged at 2 Weeks, But Disengage Before 8 Weeks

    Number of treatment sessions attended

    weeks 9 - 12

  • Treatment Engagement of Those Non-engaged at 2 Weeks and at 8 Weeks

    Number of treatment sessions attended

    weeks 9 - 12

  • Any Drinking Days in Previous Month

    Days of any drinking in previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.

    Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)

  • Any Drinking Days in Previous Month

    Any drinking days during previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.

    Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)

  • Any Drinking

    Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.

    Month 4 (weeks 13 - 15 post baseline)

  • Any Drinking

    Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back, This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.

    Month 5 (weeks 16 - 20 post baseline)

  • Any Drinking

    Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.

    Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Drinking

    Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

    Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Drinking

    Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

    Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Drinking

    Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

    Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Drinking

    Percent days of any drinking at follow up, fromTime Line Follow Back

    Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Drinking

    Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back

    Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24)

  • Any Heavy Drinking Days

    days of five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.

    Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)

  • Any Heavy Drinking Days

    five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.

    Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)

  • Any Heavy Drinking Days

    five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.

    Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)

  • Any Heavy Drinking Days

    five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.

    Month 5 (weeks 17 to 20 post baseline)

  • Any Heavy Drinking Days

    five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.

    Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Heavy Drinking

    Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women

    Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Heavy Drinking

    Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \* heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women.

    Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Heavy Drinking

    Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women

    Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Heavy Drinking

    Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \* heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women

    Month 5 ( weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Heavy Drinking

    Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women

    Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)

  • Any Cocaine Use

    Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use.

    Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)

  • Any Cocaine Use

    Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use

    Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)

  • Any Cocaine Use

    Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use

    Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)

  • Any Cocaine Use

    Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use

    Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Cocaine Use

    Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported

    Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Cocaine Use

    Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported

    Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)

  • Percent Days Cocaine Use

    Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported

    Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)

Study Arms (4)

1-MI-IOP Engaged

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Randomized to treatment as usual, and they attend regularly but dropped out of treatment after randomization.

Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing

2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged

EXPERIMENTAL

Randomized to treatment as usual, and do not attend.

Behavioral: Motivational InterviewingBehavioral: Telephone counselingBehavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) CounselingDrug: medication managementBehavioral: Intensive OutPatient Therapy

3-MI-PC Engaged

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Randomized to treatment choice, but remain attending treatment as usual then dropped out of treatment after randomization.

Behavioral: Motivational InterviewingBehavioral: Telephone counselingBehavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Counseling

4-MI-PC Non-engaged

EXPERIMENTAL

Randomized to treatment choice, and do not attend treatment as usual, so the choice option is used.

Behavioral: Motivational InterviewingBehavioral: Telephone counselingBehavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) CounselingDrug: medication managementBehavioral: Intensive OutPatient Therapy

Interventions

2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.

Also known as: MI
1-MI-IOP Engaged2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged3-MI-PC Engaged4-MI-PC Non-engaged

one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.

Also known as: Telephone based stepped care.
2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged3-MI-PC Engaged4-MI-PC Non-engaged

One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.

Also known as: CBT
2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged3-MI-PC Engaged4-MI-PC Non-engaged

Prescription for naltrexone

Also known as: MM
2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged4-MI-PC Non-engaged

Return to IOP, group therapy 3 times weekly for about three hours a day.

Also known as: IOP
2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged4-MI-PC Non-engaged

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • meet DSM-IV criteria for lifetime cocaine or alcohol dependence and have used cocaine or alcohol in the prior 6 months;
  • be \> 18 years of age;
  • be judged clinically appropriate for IOP (e.g., no current psychotic disorder or evidence of severe dementia, and no acute medical problem requiring inpatient treatment;
  • have no regular IV heroin use during the past year;
  • have access to a telephone;
  • be willing to be randomized and participate in research; and
  • no current participation in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP. Finally, because of study follow-up requirements, subjects will
  • be required to be metropolitan area residents, and

You may not qualify if:

  • have a current psychotic disorder (as assessed with the psychotic screen from the MINI) or evidence of dementia severe enough to prevent participation in outpatient treatment;
  • have acute medical problem requiring immediate inpatient treatment; or
  • are currently participating in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Presbyterian Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

VAMC

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

NorthEast Treatment Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19123, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Substance-Related Disorders

Interventions

Motivational InterviewingCognitive Behavioral TherapyCounselingMedication Therapy Management

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Directive CounselingMental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyCommunity Health ServicesPharmaceutical ServicesMedicare Part DInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesInsurance, HealthInsuranceFinancing, OrganizedEconomicsHealth Care Economics and OrganizationsMedicarePatient Care ManagementHealth Services Administration

Results Point of Contact

Title
James McKay, PhD
Organization
University of Pennsylvania

Study Officials

  • James R. McKay, Ph.D

    University of Pennsylvania

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2009

First Posted

December 15, 2009

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

September 5, 2017

Results First Posted

May 15, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations