Adaptive Treatment for Alcohol and Cocaine Dependence
2 other identifiers
interventional
500
1 country
3
Brief Summary
- Hypothesis 1: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce higher rates of treatment engagement than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (e.g., MI-IOP).
- Hypothesis 2: An intervention that explores several possible treatment options with the patient and provides the chosen option (e.g., MI-PC) will produce better cocaine/alcohol use outcomes than an intervention focused on engagement in IOP only (MI-IOP).
- Secondary analysis 1: Among the Non-engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
- Secondary analysis 2: Among the Engaged patients, determine rates of selection of each of the three options in MI-PC, retention rates within each option, and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes in each option.
- Primary objective #2: Determine whether the relative effectiveness of MI-IOP and MI-PC varies as a function of engagement group, with regard to treatment engagement over weeks 1-12 and cocaine/alcohol use outcomes over weeks 1-24.
- Hypothesis 1: The predicted main effect on retention favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
- Hypothesis 2: The predicted main effect on cocaine/alcohol use outcomes favoring MI-PC over MI-IOP will be significantly larger among patients in the Non-engaged group than among those in the Engaged group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 15, 2017
CompletedSeptember 5, 2017
August 1, 2017
5.2 years
December 14, 2009
March 28, 2017
August 1, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (30)
Treatment Engagement
Number of treatment sessions attended
weeks 3 - 12
Treatment Engagement for Participants Engaged at 2 Weeks, But Disengage Before 8 Weeks
Number of treatment sessions attended
weeks 9 - 12
Treatment Engagement of Those Non-engaged at 2 Weeks and at 8 Weeks
Number of treatment sessions attended
weeks 9 - 12
Any Drinking Days in Previous Month
Days of any drinking in previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Any Drinking Days in Previous Month
Any drinking days during previous month, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Any Drinking
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 15 post baseline)
Any Drinking
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back, This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 5 (weeks 16 - 20 post baseline)
Any Drinking
Any drinking at follow up, as reported on Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample drank in the follow up period.
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, fromTime Line Follow Back
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Percent Days Drinking
Percent days of any drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
days of five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women, at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more drinks per drinking day for women at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 5 (weeks 17 to 20 post baseline)
Any Heavy Drinking Days
five or more drinks per day for men, four or more drinks per day for women, from Time Line Follow Back. This is a dichotomous measure, so the means that are reported are the percentage of people who have had any days of heavy drinking during the follow up period specified. In other words, 0.57 indicates that 57% of the sample engaged in heavy drinking in the follow up period.
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women
Month 2 (weeks 5 - 8 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \* heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per day for men, four or more for women.
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \* heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women
Month 5 ( weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Percent Days Heavy Drinking
Percent days heavy drinking at follow up, from Time Line Follow Back \*heavy drinking is defined as five or more drinks per drinking day for men, four or more for women
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Any Cocaine Use
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use.
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Any Cocaine Use
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
Month 4 (weeks 13 - 16 post baseline)
Any Cocaine Use
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Any Cocaine Use
Any cocaine using self report, binary measure of percent days cocaine use
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
Month 3 (weeks 9 - 12 post baseline)
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
Month 5 (weeks 17 - 20 post baseline)
Percent Days Cocaine Use
Percent days of any cocaine use, self reported
Month 6 (weeks 21 - 24 post baseline)
Study Arms (4)
1-MI-IOP Engaged
ACTIVE COMPARATORRandomized to treatment as usual, and they attend regularly but dropped out of treatment after randomization.
2-MI-IOP Non-Engaged
EXPERIMENTALRandomized to treatment as usual, and do not attend.
3-MI-PC Engaged
ACTIVE COMPARATORRandomized to treatment choice, but remain attending treatment as usual then dropped out of treatment after randomization.
4-MI-PC Non-engaged
EXPERIMENTALRandomized to treatment choice, and do not attend treatment as usual, so the choice option is used.
Interventions
2 sessions at week 2, potential 2 sessions at week 8 if the participant drops out.
one telephone counseling session per week for 10 weeks.
One CBT session per week, for 10 weeks.
Prescription for naltrexone
Return to IOP, group therapy 3 times weekly for about three hours a day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- meet DSM-IV criteria for lifetime cocaine or alcohol dependence and have used cocaine or alcohol in the prior 6 months;
- be \> 18 years of age;
- be judged clinically appropriate for IOP (e.g., no current psychotic disorder or evidence of severe dementia, and no acute medical problem requiring inpatient treatment;
- have no regular IV heroin use during the past year;
- have access to a telephone;
- be willing to be randomized and participate in research; and
- no current participation in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP. Finally, because of study follow-up requirements, subjects will
- be required to be metropolitan area residents, and
You may not qualify if:
- have a current psychotic disorder (as assessed with the psychotic screen from the MINI) or evidence of dementia severe enough to prevent participation in outpatient treatment;
- have acute medical problem requiring immediate inpatient treatment; or
- are currently participating in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Presbyterian Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
VAMC
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
NorthEast Treatment Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19123, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James McKay, PhD
- Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James R. McKay, Ph.D
University of Pennsylvania
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2009
First Posted
December 15, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 5, 2017
Results First Posted
May 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08