Macular EpiRetinal Brachytherapy Versus Lucentis® Only Treatment (MERLOT)
MERLOT
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Epimacular Brachytherapy Versus Ranibizumab Monotherapy for the Treatment of Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularisation Associated With Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration in Patients Who Have Commenced Anti-VEGF Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
363
1 country
24
Brief Summary
Wet age-related macular degeneration is the most common cause of blind registration in the United Kingdom (UK). Standard treatment involves regular eye injections of a drug called ranibizumab (Lucentis). For most patients, ranibizumab maintains their vision but the effect of the drug is temporary, and they therefore require monthly hospital visits and typically six injections into the eye every year, probably for life. This study tests a new surgical device that delivers a focal dose of radiation (epimacular brachytherapy) to the macula (the part inside the back of the eye that gives fine central vision), to try and reduce or eliminate the need for ongoing, regular eye injections. The trial compares epimacular brachytherapy to ongoing standard treatment with ranibizumab. Whereas most studies of this new surgical device target patients who have not yet commenced any treatment, this study targets those who are requiring frequent eye injections, as there are limited surgical resources and these resources are best directed to those who have not fully responded to ranibizumab therapy, or whose response is shortlived. These patients have the most to gain from a device that may reduce their burden of treatment. The findings in untreated disease cannot be extrapolated to this discrete subset of patients, hence the need for a study that targets refractory disease. It is hypothesised that epimacular brachytherapy will reduce the frequency of Lucentis® (ranibizumab) re-treatment that patients require, whilst maintaining visual acuity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Nov 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_4
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 22, 2019
CompletedDecember 7, 2020
May 1, 2019
5.3 years
November 2, 2009
July 25, 2018
November 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Mean Change in Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12
Manifest refraction and BCVA measurements were performed according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and adapted for the Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) protocol. Visual acuity testing was measured at a distance of 4 meters and, for subjects with sufficiently reduced vision, at 1 meter. The ETDRS charts consist of 14 lines, each comprising a series of 5 letters of equal difficulty, with standardized spacing between letters and rows (total 70 letters). Minimum is 0 (no letters read at 1 m) and maximum possible is 100 (70 letters read at 4 m + 30). If visual acuity is so poor that the subject cannot read any of the largest letters at 1 meter count fingers (CF), hand movements (HM) and light perception (PL) are tested. The mean change in ETDRS BCVA was calculated from baseline to month 12.
12 months
Mean Number of Re-treatment Injections of Lucentis® Per Patient, Per Year.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Subjects Losing < 15 ETDRS Letters
12 months
Percentage of Subjects Gaining ≥ 0 ETDRS Letters
12 months
Percentage of Subjects Gaining ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters
12 months
Change in Total Lesion Size by Fluorescein Angiography From Baseline to Month 12
12 months
Change in Total Choroidal Neovascular Membrane (CNV) Size by Fluorescein Angiography From Baseline to Month 12
12 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A (treatment)
EXPERIMENTALArm A: A single surgical procedure with epimacular brachytherapy using the VIDION® System, with Lucentis® (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required.
Arm B (control):
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm B: Lucentis® (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required, using the re-treatment criteria below.
Interventions
Strontium-90. The device delivers 24 Gray of beta radiation to the choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV) lesion. Each device is calibrated for a set duration.
intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required, using the re-treatment criteria
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation associated with wet age-related macular degeneration. Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation (RAP) lesions not directly involving the fovea must be associated with contiguous foveal leakage demonstrated on fundus examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), or fluorescein angiography;
- Subjects must have received anti-VEGF induction treatment, defined as the first three months of anti-VEGF therapy. Following this induction period, subjects must have received at least 4 additional injections of Lucentis® in no more than 12 months preceding enrolment, or 2 additional injections of Lucentis® in no more than 6 months preceding enrolment, given on an as needed basis;
- At the time subjects commenced anti-VEGF therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration they were aged 50 years or older and met the NICE treatment criteria for Lucentis® therapy, as outlined in the Final Appraisal Determination (FAD). This states that all of the following circumstances must apply in the eye to be treated:
- the best-corrected visual acuity is between 6/12 and 6/96 (24 to 69 ETDRS letters)
- there is no permanent structural damage to the central fovea
- the lesion size is less than or equal to 12 disc areas in greatest linear dimension
- there is evidence of recent presumed disease progression (blood vessel growth, as indicated by fluorescein angiography, or recent visual acuity changes)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have not been treated in accordance with NICE guidance;
- Visual acuity worse than 6/96 at the time of study enrolment;
- Subjects with prior or concurrent subfoveal CNV therapy with agents, surgery or devices (other than Macugen®, Avastin®, or Lucentis®) including thermal laser photocoagulation (with or without photographic evidence), photodynamic therapy, intravitreal or subretinal steroids, and transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT);
- Subfoveal scarring;
- Subjects with active concomitant disease in the study eye, including uveitis, presence of pigment epithelial tears or rips, acute ocular or periocular infection;
- Subjects who have been previously diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Subjects who do not have a documented diagnosis, but have retinal findings consistent with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus;
- Subjects with advanced glaucoma (greater than 0.8 cup:disk) or intraocular pressure ≥ 30 mmHg in the study eye;
- Previous glaucoma filtering surgery in the study eye;
- Subjects with inadequate pupillary dilation or significant media opacities in the study eye, including cataract, which may interfere with visual acuity or the evaluation of the posterior segment;
- Current vitreous haemorrhage in the study eye;
- History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole in the study eye;
- Subjects who present with CNV due to causes other than AMD, including subjects with known or suspected idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV), ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, multifocal choroiditis, choroidal rupture, or pathologic myopia (spherical equivalent ≥ 8 Dioptre or axial length ≥ 25mm);
- Previous cataract surgery within 2 months prior to enrolment into the study;
- Subjects with known serious allergies to fluorescein dye used in angiography;
- Subjects with known sensitivity or allergy to Lucentis®;
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (24)
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom
Plymouth Royal Eye Infirmary
Plymouth, Devon, PL4 6PL, United Kingdom
Torbay Hospital
Torquay, Devon, TQ2 7AA, United Kingdom
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Bournemouth, Dorset, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
Sussex Eye Hospital
Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 5BF, United Kingdom
Hull and East Yorks Hospital
Hull, East Yorkshire, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
Essex County Hospital
Colchester, Essex, CO3 3SP, United Kingdom
Southend Hospital
Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, SS0 0RY, United Kingdom
Manchester Royal Eye Hospital
Manchester, Greater Manchester, M13 9WH, United Kingdom
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO6 3LY, United Kingdom
Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9QQ, United Kingdom
Ashford William Harvey Hospital
Willesborough, Kent, TN24 0LZ, United Kingdom
Royal Liverpool Hospital
Liverpool, Merseyside, L7 8XP, United Kingdom
Arrowe Park Hospital
Upton, Merseyside, CH49 5PE, United Kingdom
James Cook Hospital
Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, TS4 3BW, United Kingdom
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
Southampton Hospital
Shirley, Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom
Sunderland Eye Infimary
Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR2 9HP, United Kingdom
Warwick Hospital Eye Unit
Warwick, Warwickshire, CV34 5BW, United Kingdom
St James University Hospital
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
Bristol Eye Hospital
Bristol, BS1 2LX, United Kingdom
Darlington Memorial Hospital
Darlington, DL3 6HX, United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Jackson TL, Soare C, Petrarca C, Simpson A, Neffendorf JE, Petrarca R, Muldrew KA, Peto T, Chakravarthy U, Membrey L, Haynes R, Costen M, Steel DHW, Desai R; MERLOT Study Group. Epimacular brachytherapy for previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration: month 36 results of the MERLOT randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;107(7):987-992. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320620. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
PMID: 35217515DERIVEDEvans JR, Igwe C, Jackson TL, Chong V. Radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD004004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004004.pub4.
PMID: 32844399DERIVEDJackson TL, Soare C, Petrarca C, Simpson A, Neffendorf JE, Petrarca R, Muldrew A, Peto T, Chakravarthy U, Membrey L, Haynes R, Costen M, Steel D, Desai R; MERLOT Study Group. Evaluation of Month-24 Efficacy and Safety of Epimacular Brachytherapy for Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The MERLOT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 1;138(8):835-842. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2309.
PMID: 32644148DERIVEDJackson TL, Dugel PU, Bebchuk JD, Smith KR, Petrarca R, Slakter JS, Jaffe GJ, Nau JA; CABERNET Study Group. Epimacular brachytherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (CABERNET): fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.074. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PMID: 23490325DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Radiation-related microvascular retinal changes may occur beyond the 12 month reporting window (three years' follow up is planned)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mr Tim Jackson
- Organization
- King's College Hospital, London
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy L Jackson, PhD FRCOphth
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2009
First Posted
November 3, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 7, 2020
Results First Posted
July 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share