A Study of Safety and Efficacy of HPN-100 in Subjects With Cirrhosis and Episodic Hepatic Encephalopathy
HALT-HE
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of HPN-100 for Maintaining Remission in Subjects With Cirrhosis and Episodic Hepatic Encephalopathy
1 other identifier
interventional
189
1 country
28
Brief Summary
This is a phase 2 study of HPN-100 in subjects with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) consisting of an open label safety lead-in (Part A), followed by randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment (Part B).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2009
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 30, 2015
CompletedJuly 10, 2024
June 1, 2024
2.3 years
October 8, 2009
July 1, 2015
June 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Part A: The Rate of AEs and Tolerability of HPN-100
Part A: The rate of AEs and tolerability of 6 mL and 9 mL doses of HPN-100 were considered the primary safety endpoints for Part A. Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory tests (including ammonia, hematology, coagulation, liver function and serum chemistry parameters), vital signs, physical and neurological examinations, and electrocardiograms.
Part A: 28 days
Part B: Proportion of Subjects Who Exhibit an HE Episode, Defined as Either of the Following During the Treatment Phase: WH ≥2; WH Grade and Asterixis Grade Increase of 1 Each, if Baseline WH = 0
An HE event was defined as occurrences of either a West Haven (WH) Grade ≥2 or a WH Grade 1 and asterixis grade increase of 1 (if baseline WH = 0). The WH criteria are widely used for rating the severity of HE and are summarized below: Grade 1: trivial lack of awareness, euphoria or anxiety, shortened attention span, impaired performance of addition Grade 2: lethargy or apathy, minimal disorientation for time or place, subtle personality change, inappropriate behavior, impaired performance of subtraction Grade 3: somnolence to semi-stupor but responsive to verbal stimuli, confusion, gross disorientation Grade 4: coma (unresponsive to verbal or noxious stimuli) Asterixis was assessed after arm and forearm extension along with wrist dorsiflexion for 30 seconds and assigned a grade according to the following criteria: Grade 1: rare flaps Grade 2: occasional irregular flaps Grade 3: frequent flaps Grade 4: continuous flaps
Part B: 112 Days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Total Number of HE Events
112 Days
Time to Meeting the Primary Endpoint
112 Days
Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Score
Day 56, Final Visit (D112)
Study Arms (2)
HPN-100
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects aged 18 and over
- Clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis of any cause
- Potential to benefit from HE treatment
- History of greater than or equal to 2 documented episodes of WH Grade 2 or more HE within the past 6 months, at least one of which occurred within the preceding 3 months
- No change in other HE-specific medications within 1 week before randomization
- Able to give informed consent and comply with study activities
- Availability of at least one designated family member or caregiver who is capable of and willing to assume responsibility for facilitating subject compliance with study procedures
- All females of childbearing age and all sexually active males must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception throughout the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any investigational drug within 30 days
- Use of prohibited medications
- Uncontrolled infection
- Active GI bleeding or a history of GI bleeding requiring blood transfusion (\> 2 units) within 3 months
- Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement or revision within the past 90 days
- Recreational drug use or alcohol consumption for subjects with a history of alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months
- Lactating and/or pregnant females
- Active malignancy
- Clinically significant bowel disease, including obstruction, inflammatory bowel disease, or malabsorption
- Expected to undergo transplantation within 6 months
- Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of \> 25
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Study Sites (28)
Stanford University Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
University of Miami / Center for Liver Diseases
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Tulane University Health Science Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Henry Ford Hospital / Department of Gastroenterology
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, United States
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Concorde Medical Group PLLC
New York, New York, 10016, United States
NYU Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Columbia University Medical Center / Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation
New York, New York, 10032, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
New York Medical College / Westchester Medical Center
Valhalla, New York, 10595, United States
University of Cincinnati / Division of Digestive Diseases
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
The Digestive Disease Center at Vanderbilt
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75203, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Baylor College of Medicine-St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
Related Publications (2)
Rockey DC, Vierling JM, Mantry P, Ghabril M, Brown RS Jr, Alexeeva O, Zupanets IA, Grinevich V, Baranovsky A, Dudar L, Fadieienko G, Kharchenko N, Klaryts'ka I, Morozov V, Grewal P, McCashland T, Reddy KG, Reddy KR, Syplyviy V, Bass NM, Dickinson K, Norris C, Coakley D, Mokhtarani M, Scharschmidt BF; HALT-HE Study Group. Randomized, double-blind, controlled study of glycerol phenylbutyrate in hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 2014 Mar;59(3):1073-83. doi: 10.1002/hep.26611.
PMID: 23847109RESULTMokhtarani M, Diaz GA, Rhead W, Berry SA, Lichter-Konecki U, Feigenbaum A, Schulze A, Longo N, Bartley J, Berquist W, Gallagher R, Smith W, McCandless SE, Harding C, Rockey DC, Vierling JM, Mantry P, Ghabril M, Brown RS Jr, Dickinson K, Moors T, Norris C, Coakley D, Milikien DA, Nagamani SC, Lemons C, Lee B, Scharschmidt BF. Elevated phenylacetic acid levels do not correlate with adverse events in patients with urea cycle disorders or hepatic encephalopathy and can be predicted based on the plasma PAA to PAGN ratio. Mol Genet Metab. 2013 Dec;110(4):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.09.017. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
PMID: 24144944DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Julia Egofske
- Organization
- Horizon Therapeutics, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2009
First Posted
October 21, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 10, 2024
Results First Posted
September 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors. If not approved, a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel will arbitrate and make the final decision. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.