NCT00967057

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This partially randomized phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating young patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
470

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 leukemia

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2002

Typical duration for phase_3 leukemia

Geographic Reach
2 countries

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2002

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2010

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

August 12, 2013

Status Verified

January 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

August 26, 2009

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

recurrent childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemiaT-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Progression-free survival (PFS) of United Kingdom (UK) patients stratified by risk groups

  • Evaluation of whether a minimal residual disease (MRD) level of 10(-4) is a suitable criterion at the end of induction therapy on which to decide whether chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation will be most beneficial to patients with intermediate- ...

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • MRD as a surrogate marker for treatment response and PFS

  • Comparison of PFS, MRD level at day 35, and toxicity as response variables in patients randomized to receive induction therapy with mitoxantrone hydrochloride or idarubicin

  • PFS of all patients (UK, Dutch, Australian, and New Zealand) stratified by risk groups

  • Comparison of PFS and overall survival between patients enrolled in this study and patients enrolled in R2 or I-BFM

  • Evaluation of whether pre-stem cell transplantation cytoreduction (FLAD) reduces tumor load and how it affects outcome following transplant

Study Arms (2)

Arm I (induction therapy)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive idarubicin IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2; oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5 and 15-19; intrathecal (IT) methotrexate on days 1 and 8; vincristine sulfate IV on days 3, 10, 17, and 24; and pegaspargase intramuscularly (IM) on days 3 and 17 or asparaginase IM on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25.

Drug: asparaginaseDrug: dexamethasoneDrug: idarubicinDrug: methotrexateDrug: pegaspargaseDrug: vincristine sulfate

Arm II (induction therapy)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive mitoxantrone IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive dexamethasone, methotrexate, vincristine sulfate, and pegaspargase or asparaginase as in arm I.

Drug: asparaginaseDrug: dexamethasoneDrug: methotrexateDrug: mitoxantrone hydrochlorideDrug: pegaspargaseDrug: vincristine sulfate

Interventions

Given intramuscularly

Arm I (induction therapy)Arm II (induction therapy)

Given orally

Arm I (induction therapy)Arm II (induction therapy)

Given IV

Arm I (induction therapy)

Given intrathecally

Arm I (induction therapy)Arm II (induction therapy)

Given IV

Arm II (induction therapy)

Given intramuscularly

Arm I (induction therapy)Arm II (induction therapy)

Given IV

Arm I (induction therapy)Arm II (induction therapy)

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) meeting 1 of the following criteria: * In first relapse after treatment * Has not yet received chemotherapy or radiotherapy for the first relapse * Primary refractory disease * No mature B-cell ALL * Meets criteria for one of the following risk groups: * Standard-risk disease: non-T-cell or T-cell ALL with late isolated extramedullary relapse * Intermediate-risk disease: non-T-cell ALL with early isolated extramedullary relapse or combined marrow and extramedullary relapse; non-T-cell ALL with late combined marrow and extramedullary relapse or isolated marrow relapse; or T-cell ALL with early isolated extramedullary relapse * High-risk disease: non-T-cell ALL with very early isolated extramedullary relapse, combined marrow and extramedullary relapse, or isolated marrow relapse; non-T-cell ALL with early isolated marrow relapse; T-cell ALL with very early isolated extramedullary relapse, combined marrow and extramedullary relapse, or isolated marrow relapse; T-cell ALL with early combined marrow and extramedullary relapse or isolated marrow relapse; or T-cell ALL with late combined marrow and extramedullary relapse or isolated marrow relapse PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Not specified PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * No prior bone marrow transplant

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Women's and Children's Hospital

North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006, Australia

Location

Birmingham Children's Hospital

Birmingham, England, B4 6NH, United Kingdom

Location

Bristol Royal Hospital for Children

Bristol, England, BS2 8BJ, United Kingdom

Location

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children

London, England, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom

Location

Christie Hospital

Manchester, England, M20 4BX, United Kingdom

Location

Southampton General Hospital

Southampton, England, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Parker C, Waters R, Leighton C, Hancock J, Sutton R, Moorman AV, Ancliff P, Morgan M, Masurekar A, Goulden N, Green N, Revesz T, Darbyshire P, Love S, Saha V. Effect of mitoxantrone on outcome of children with first relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL R3): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Dec 11;376(9757):2009-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62002-8. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

  • Eckert C, Parker C, Moorman AV, Irving JA, Kirschner-Schwabe R, Groeneveld-Krentz S, Revesz T, Hoogerbrugge P, Hancock J, Sutton R, Henze G, Chen-Santel C, Attarbaschi A, Bourquin JP, Sramkova L, Zimmermann M, Krishnan S, von Stackelberg A, Saha V. Risk factors and outcomes in children with high-risk B-cell precursor and T-cell relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: combined analysis of ALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jul;151:175-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 May 16.

  • Parker C, Krishnan S, Hamadeh L, Irving JAE, Kuiper RP, Revesz T, Hoogerbrugge P, Hancock J, Sutton R, Moorman AV, Saha V. Outcomes of patients with childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with late bone marrow relapses: long-term follow-up of the ALLR3 open-label randomised trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Apr;6(4):e204-e216. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30003-1. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

LeukemiaPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Interventions

AsparaginaseDexamethasoneIdarubicinMethotrexateMitoxantronepegaspargaseVincristine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesLeukemia, LymphoidLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AmidohydrolasesHydrolasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesPregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, FluorinatedDaunorubicinAnthracyclinesNaphthacenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesAminopterinPterinsPteridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsAnthraquinonesAnthronesAnthracenesQuinonesVinca AlkaloidsSecologanin Tryptamine AlkaloidsIndole AlkaloidsAlkaloidsIndolesIndolizidinesIndolizines

Study Officials

  • Vaskar Saha, MD

    The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2009

First Posted

August 27, 2009

Study Start

October 1, 2002

Primary Completion

January 1, 2010

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

August 12, 2013

Record last verified: 2011-01

Locations