NCT00934544

Brief Summary

This was an open label, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of randomized 2:1 Ruxolitinib tablets versus best-available therapy, as selected by the investigator. The purpose was to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Ruxolitinib (INC424/INCB018424) given twice daily to the best-available therapy, in subjects with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF).

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
219

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
9 countries

61 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 6, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2009

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 30, 2012

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 4, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 4, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 19, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

5.7 years

First QC Date

July 6, 2009

Results QC Date

December 15, 2011

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

MyelofibrosisPost-Polycythemia Vera MyelofibrosisPost-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 48

    The change in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or by computer tomography (CT) for participants unable to undergo MRI) and was calculated only for participants who had an evaluable spleen volume at baseline. The percentage of participants achieving a greater than or equal to 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 48 was then calculated by treatment group.

    Baseline, Week 48

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Median)

    Baseline, up to Year 5

  • Duration of Maintenance of Spleen Volume Reduction (Kaplan-Meier Estimates)

    Baseline, up to Year 5

  • Percentage of Participants With at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline at Week 24

    Baseline, Week 24

  • Time to First at Least 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume From Baseline by Treatment (Primary Analysis)

    Time from randomization and date of the first MRI showing at least 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume

  • Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Time from randomization and the earliest of either increase in spleen volume >=25% from on-study nadir, splenic irradiation, splenectomy, leukemic transformation or death

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ruxolitinib

EXPERIMENTAL

5 mg tablets administered orally in an outpatient setting according to the protocol-specified dosing schedule

Drug: Ruxolitinib

Best Available Therapy (BAT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Commercially available therapy, oral or parenteral, per manufacturer's instructions and Investigator discretion. BAT included the option of no treatment. Patients randomized to BAT were eligible to cross over to receive open-label ruxolitinib after a qualifying progression event, if they met the safety criteria. After the primary analysis in January 2011, patients randomized to receive BAT were allowed to cross over to receive ruxolitinib and move to the extension phase of the study without a qualifying progression event.

Drug: Best Available Therapy (BAT)

Interventions

5 mg tablets packaged as 60-count in high-density polyethylene bottles

Ruxolitinib

Prescribing and usage per respective package inserts

Best Available Therapy (BAT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must be diagnosed with PMF, PPV-MF or PET-MF according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria
  • Subjects with MF requiring therapy must be classified as high risk OR intermediate risk level 2 according to the prognostic factors defined by the International Working Group
  • Subjects with an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, 2 or 3
  • Subjects with peripheral blood blast count of \< 10%.
  • Subjects who have not previously received treatment with a JAK inhibitor

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Subjects with inadequate bone marrow reserve as demonstrated by specific clinical laboratory counts
  • Subjects with any history of platelet counts \< 50,000/µL or ANC \< 500/µL except during treatment for a myeloproliferative disorder or treatment with cytotoxic therapy for any other reason
  • Subjects with inadequate liver or renal function
  • Subjects with clinically significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic or viral infection which require therapy
  • Subjects with an active malignancy over the previous 5 years except specific skin cancers
  • Subjects with severe cardiac conditions
  • Subjects who have had splenic irradiation within 12 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (61)

Novartis Investigative Site

Innsbruck, 6020, Austria

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Linz, 4010, Austria

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Salzburg, 5020, Austria

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Vienna, A-1090, Austria

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Antwerp, 2020, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Antwerp, 2060, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Bruges, 8000, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, 1200, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Hasselt, 3500, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Kortrijk, 8500, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

La Louvière, 7100, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Leuven, 3000, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Roeselare, 8800, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Yvoir, 5530, Belgium

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Amiens, 80054, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Caen, 14033, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Grenoble, 38043, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Lens, 62307, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Lille, 59037, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Lyon, 69437, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Marseille, 13273, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Nîmes, 30029, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Paris, 75010, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Paris, 75012, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Paris, 75014, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Pessac, 33600, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Poitiers, 86021, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Rennes, F-35043, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Strasbourg, 67091, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Toulouse, 31059, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Villejuif, 94805, France

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, 13353, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Cologne, 50937, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Frankfurt/M, 60590, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Magdeburg, 39120, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Mainz, 55131, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Münster, 48149, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Stuttgart, 70376, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Tübingen, 72076, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Ulm, 89081, Germany

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Pavia, (PV), 27100, Italy

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Monza, MB, 20900, Italy

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Milan, MI, 20162, Italy

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Florence, 50134, Italy

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Orbassano, 10043, Italy

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Pavia, 27100, Italy

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Amsterdam, 1081, Netherlands

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Maastricht, 5800, Netherlands

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Nijmegen, 6500 MB, Netherlands

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Rotterdam, 3015 CE, Netherlands

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

The Hague, 2545 CH, Netherlands

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Valencia, Valencia, 46010, Spain

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Sweden

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Stockholm, SE-118 83, Sweden

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Belfast, BT9 7AB, United Kingdom

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

Location

Novartis Investigative Site

Oxford, OX37LJ, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Verstovsek S, Gotlib J, Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, Cervantes F, Harrison CN, Paquette R, Sun W, Naim A, Langmuir P, Dong T, Gopalakrishna P, Gupta V. Long-term survival in patients treated with ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis: COMFORT-I and -II pooled analyses. J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Sep 29;10(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0527-7.

  • McMullin MF, Harrison CN, Niederwieser D, Demuynck H, Jakel N, Gopalakrishna P, McQuitty M, Stalbovskaya V, Recher C, Theunissen K, Gisslinger H, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK. The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in COMFORT-II: an open-label, phase 3 study assessing efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in the treatment of myelofibrosis. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2015 Sep 15;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s40164-015-0021-2. eCollection 2015.

  • Vannucchi AM, Kantarjian HM, Kiladjian JJ, Gotlib J, Cervantes F, Mesa RA, Sarlis NJ, Peng W, Sandor V, Gopalakrishna P, Hmissi A, Stalbovskaya V, Gupta V, Harrison C, Verstovsek S; COMFORT Investigators. A pooled analysis of overall survival in COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, 2 randomized phase III trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2015 Sep;100(9):1139-45. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.119545. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

  • Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Sirulnik A, Stalbovskaya V, McQuitty M, Hunter DS, Levy RS, Passamonti F, Barbui T, Barosi G, Harrison CN, Knoops L, Gisslinger H; COMFORT-II investigators. Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Blood. 2013 Dec 12;122(25):4047-53. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-485888. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

  • Wilkins BS, Radia D, Woodley C, Farhi SE, Keohane C, Harrison CN. Resolution of bone marrow fibrosis in a patient receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor treatment with ruxolitinib. Haematologica. 2013 Dec;98(12):1872-6. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.095109. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

  • Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Verstovsek S, Al-Ali HK, Gotlib J, Gisslinger H, Levy R, Siulnik A, Gupta V, Khan M, DiPersio JF, McQuitty M, Catalano JV, Hunter DS, Knoops L, Deininger M, Cervantes F, Miller C, Vannucchi AM, Silver RT, Barbui T, Talpaz M, Barosi G, Winton EF, Mendeson E, Harvey JH Jr, Arcasoy MO, Hexner E, Lyons RM, Paquette R, Raza A, Sun W, Sandor V, Kantarjian HM, Harrison C. Comparison of placebo and best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Haematologica. 2014 Feb;99(2):292-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.087650. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

  • Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V, McQuitty M, Hunter DS, Levy R, Knoops L, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Barosi G. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):787-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110556.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Primary Myelofibrosis

Interventions

ruxolitinib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Myeloproliferative DisordersBone Marrow DiseasesHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Disclosure Office
Organization
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study Officials

  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2009

First Posted

July 8, 2009

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

March 4, 2015

Study Completion

March 4, 2015

Last Updated

August 19, 2019

Results First Posted

May 30, 2012

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations