A Randomized Study of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) With Daunorubicine and Cytarabine in Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Aged of 50-70 Years Old
A Phase III Multicentric Randomized Study of the Combination of Repeated Doses of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) With Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Versus Daunorubicin and Cytarabine in Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Aged of 50-70 Years Old.
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
19
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare conventional chemotherapy: daunorubicin and the Aracytine and this chemotherapy in combination with the monoclonal antibody used Mylotarg in divided doses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Dec 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_3
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedJuly 11, 2013
July 1, 2013
3.6 years
April 29, 2009
July 10, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Event Free Survival (EFS)
Relapse or death measured from randomization
Secondary Outcomes (6)
CR rate
CR after induction
Cumulative incidence of relapse
Relapse from CR
Overall Survival
Survival from randomization
Safety of the combination Mylotarg+chemotherapy
Duration of study
Possible predictors of response to Mylotarg: with respect to MDR (multi drug resistance) status, cytogenetics risk groups and mutational status (FLT3, MLL, CEBPa, NPM)
Duration of study
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A Daunorubicin and Cytarabine
ACTIVE COMPARATORDaunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2. Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4.
Arm B Daunorubicin and Cytarabine and Mylotarg
EXPERIMENTALDaunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2. Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4. Mylotarg® (GO)induction : 3 mg/m2 IV (2 hours) Days 1, 4, 7. Mylotarg® (GO) First consolidation and Second Consolidation:3 mg/m2 day 1.
Interventions
Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2. Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4.
Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2. Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4. Mylotarg® (GO)induction : 3 mg/m2 IV (2 hours) Days 1, 4, 7. Mylotarg® (GO) First consolidation and Second Consolidation:3 mg/m2 day 1.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the two following criteria: Age \> 50 years and £ 70 years. Not previously treated for their disease.
- ECOG performance status 0 to 3
- Negative serology HIV, HBV and HBC (except post vaccination)
- Serum creatinin inf 2.5N; AST and ALT inf 2.5N; total bilirubin inf 2N
- Cardiac function determined by radionucleide or echography within normal limits.
- Negative serum pregnancy test within one week before treatment for women of child bearing potential.
- Signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- M3-AML
- AML following previously know myeloproliferative syndrome.
- Known central nervous system involvement.
- Uncontrolled infection
- Other active malignancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Acute Leukemia French Associationlead
- Versailles Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (19)
CH
Argenteuil, 95107, France
Hopital Avicenne
Bobigny, 93309, France
CH
Caen, 14033, France
Hopital Percy
Clamart, 92141, France
CHU
Créteil, 94010, France
CHU
Dijon, 21034, France
CH
Lens, 62307, France
CHU
Lille, 59037, France
CH
Limoges, 87042, France
Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437, France
CH
Meaux, 77104, France
Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, 75651, France
Hopital Saint-Louis
Paris, France
CH
Roubaix, 59100, France
CHU
Rouen, 76038, France
CNLCC
Saint-Cloud, 92210, France
CH
Valenciennes, 59322, France
Hospital Central
Versailles, 78157, France
IGR
Villejuif, 94805, France
Related Publications (2)
Muresan B, Mamolo C, Cappelleri JC, Mokgokong R, Palaka A, Soikkeli F, Heeg B. Comparing cure rates for gemtuzumab ozogamicin plus standard chemotherapy vs standard chemotherapy alone in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Future Oncol. 2021 Aug;17(22):2883-2892. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1287. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
PMID: 33858190DERIVEDRenneville A, Abdelali RB, Chevret S, Nibourel O, Cheok M, Pautas C, Dulery R, Boyer T, Cayuela JM, Hayette S, Raffoux E, Farhat H, Boissel N, Terre C, Dombret H, Castaigne S, Preudhomme C. Clinical impact of gene mutations and lesions detected by SNP-array karyotyping in acute myeloid leukemia patients in the context of gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment: results of the ALFA-0701 trial. Oncotarget. 2014 Feb 28;5(4):916-32. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1536.
PMID: 24659740DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Castaigne Sylvie, Professor
Versailles Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2009
First Posted
June 25, 2009
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07