NCT00513305

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether low-dose cytarabine in combination with arsenic trioxide is more effective than low-dose cytarabine alone in achieving complete remission in elderly patients (≥60 years of age) with acute myeloid leukemia.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
67

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2007

Geographic Reach
2 countries

12 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 6, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 8, 2007

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2007

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 29, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2012

Status Verified

July 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

August 6, 2007

Results QC Date

July 29, 2010

Last Update Submit

July 24, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

acute myeloid leukemia, cytarabine, arsenic trioxide.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Participants in Complete Remission (CR)

    The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of subjects in each treatment group who achieved complete remission after treatment with study drug. Complete remission was defined as: 1) Less than 5% blasts in normocellular bone marrow sample. 2) No blasts in bone marrow sample containing Auer rods. 3)Clearance of previous extramedullary disease. 4)Normal values for absolute neutrophil count (at least 1000/microliter), platelet count (at least 100,000/microliter), without platelet transfusions, and in absence of peripheral myeloblasts.

    From baseline through Day 70. Assessments were performed on Day 21 in cycle 1, no later than Day 56 of cycle 1 or 2 (if applicable), and no later than Day 70 of cycle 1 or 2 (if applicable) or at any other time at the discretion of the investigator

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Number of Participants Who Died or Were Censored by 24 Months

    From Baseline through 24 months following Baseline

  • Proportion of Participants With Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)Using the Kaplan-Meier Estimate

    From Baseline (randomization) through 24 months following Baseline

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Early Death

    14 days from start of study drug treatment

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Induction (Thirty-Day) Mortality

    Up to 30 days following start of study drug treatment

  • Proportion of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 12 Months Using the Kaplan Meier Estimate

    Baseline through 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Low-dose cytarabine plus arsenic trioxide

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cycle 1 cytarabine 10 mg/m\^2 was administered subcutaneously (sc) twice daily (bid) on days 1-14. 0.25 mg/kg arsenic trioxide was administered intravenously (iv) on days 1-5 and days 8-12. Cycle 2 A second identical cycle of cytarabine and arsenic trioxide was given to patients with persistent disease. Patients who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete platelet count recovery (CRp), or partial remission (PR) after 1 or 2 cycles received a 14-day consolidation cycle of cytarabine and arsenic trioxide with the doses and schedule identical to the initial cycle. A recovery period of up to 4 weeks between the attainment of CR, CRp, or PR and the initiation of consolidation treatment was allowed. Patients who completed consolidation treatment started maintenance treatment of arsenic trioxide 0.25 mg/kg iv on days 1 and 4 and cytarabine 10 mg/m\^2 sc bid on days 1 through 7 of a 28-day cycle.

Drug: Arsenic trioxideDrug: Low-dose cytarabine alone

Low-dose cytarabine alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cytarabine was administered at a dose of 10 mg/m\^2 sc bid from days 1-14 of cycle 1. A second identical cycle of cytarabine was given to patients with persistent disease. Patients who achieved a complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete platelet count recovery (CRp), or partial remission (PR) after 1 or 2 cycles received a 14-day consolidation cycle of cytarabine with the doses and schedule identical to the initial treatment cycle. Recovery period up to 4 weeks between the attainment of CR, CRp, or PR and the initiation of consolidation treatment was allowed. Patients who completed consolidation treatment started maintenance treatment of cytarabine at 10 mg/m\^2 sc bid on days 1-7 of a 28-day cycle. Patients started maintenance treatment within 42 days after platelet count recovery. Maintenance treatment continued for 2 years or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.

Drug: Low-dose cytarabine alone

Interventions

Arsenic trioxide will be administered intravenously (iv) at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg.

Low-dose cytarabine plus arsenic trioxide

Cytarabine will be administered at a dose of 10 mg/m\^2 subcutaneously (sc) twice a day (bid).

Low-dose cytarabine aloneLow-dose cytarabine plus arsenic trioxide

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient has confirmed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
  • The patient is unwilling or unable to tolerate conventional induction chemotherapy.
  • The patient has no comorbid conditions that would limit life expectancy to less than 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- The patient has had previous cytotoxic chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
  • Previous treatment with low-dose cytarabine is not permitted.
  • The patient has a QT interval outside of the protocol-specified range.
  • The patient has laboratory values outside of protocol-specified ranges.
  • The patient is concurrently treated with cytotoxic therapy, radiation, or investigational agents.
  • The patient has uncontrolled, severe cardiovascular or pulmonary disease or other uncontrolled medical condition.
  • The patient has known central nervous system involvement with AML.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (12)

USC / Norris Cancer Hospital

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

Location

UCLA Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

University of Illinois

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

Indiana Oncology Hematology Consultants

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States

Location

St. Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center

New York, New York, 10011, United States

Location

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

New York, New York, 10021, United States

Location

Brody School of Medicine

Greenville, North Carolina, 27834, United States

Location

University of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States

Location

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

Location

UT Health Science Center

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Princess Margaret Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G2M9, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Interventions

Arsenic TrioxideCytarabine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leukemia, MyeloidLeukemiaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArsenicalsInorganic ChemicalsOxidesOxygen CompoundsCytidinePyrimidine NucleosidesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsArabinonucleosidesNucleosidesNucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides

Limitations and Caveats

In September 2009, the sponsor decided to stop the study due to difficulty in enrollment. The study was stopped prior to the first planned interim analysis. Most of the analysis planned in the protocol was not performed.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sponsor's Medical Expert, Clinical Research
Organization
Cephalon, Inc.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2007

First Posted

August 8, 2007

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

August 1, 2012

Results First Posted

March 29, 2011

Record last verified: 2012-07

Locations