Comparison of Ipilimumab Manufactured by 2 Different Processes in Participants With Advanced Melanoma
A Randomized, Parallel, Open-Label Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Ipilimumab (BMS-734016) Process C to Process B in Subjects With Advanced Melanoma
1 other identifier
interventional
99
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare pharmacokinetics of ipilimumab manufactured by two different processes
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Aug 2009
Typical duration for phase_1
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 6, 2014
CompletedJune 20, 2014
May 1, 2014
8 months
June 9, 2009
November 25, 2013
May 20, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the Cmax of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population
Single-dose Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of ipilimumab were derived from serum concentration versus time data. Cmax was measured from first dose to end of the induction period (4 doses) as micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Samples were obtained at 0 hour (predose) on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, and Weeks 2, 3, 4, 7, and 10; Day 1, samples were also obtained 1 h 30 minutes (min), 2 h, 2 h 30 min, 3 h 30 min, 4 h 30 min, and 6 h post dose. In calculating PK parameters, predose concentrations and concentrations prior to first quantifiable concentration below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) were treated as "missing" for the calculation of summary statistics. Drug was quantitatively determined in serum by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Individual PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods using a validated PK analysis program (Kinetica™ 4.4.1 within eToolbox \[version 2.6.1\]).
Day 1 to Day 84
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Day 21, AUC(0-21d), of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the AUC(0-21d) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population
The single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters of ipilimumab were derived from serum concentration versus time data. AUC(0-21d) was measured from first dose to end of the induction period as micrograms\*hours per milliliter (μg\*h/mL). Samples were obtained at 0 hour (predose) on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, and Weeks 2, 3, 4, 7, and 10; Day 1, samples were also obtained 1 h 30 minutes (min), 2 h, 2 h 30 min, 3 h 30 min, 4 h 30 min, and 6 h post dose. In calculating PK parameters, predose concentrations and concentrations prior to first quantifiable concentration below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) were treated as "missing" for the calculation of summary statistics. Drug was quantitatively determined in serum by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Individual PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods using a validated PK analysis program (Kinetica™ 4.4.1 within eToolbox \[version 2.6.1\]).
Day 1 to Day 84
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Time of Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the Tmax of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population
Day 1 to Day 84
Terminal Elimination Half Life (T-HALF) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the T-HALF of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population
Day 1 to Day 84
Clearance (CLT) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the CLT of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population
Day 1 to Day 84
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the Vss of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population
Day 1 to Day 84
Best Overall Tumor Response Per Investigator Based on Modified World Health Organization (mWHO) Criteria - All Randomized Participants
Day 1 to last patient, last visit, approximately 3 years
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ipilimumab (Process B)
EXPERIMENTALReference
Ipilimumab (Process C)
EXPERIMENTALTest
Interventions
Solution, Intravenous, 10 mg/kg, Every 3 weeks (up to 4 doses) in induction phase, every 12 weeks in maintenance phase, 48 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologic diagnosis of malignant melanoma
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1
- Measurable/evaluable disease per modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Active Brain Metastasis
- Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma
- Prior Autoimmune disease
- Inadequate hematologic, hepatic or renal function
- Use of immunosuppressants
- Prior treatment with a CD137 agonist or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bristol-Myers Squibblead
- Medarexcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
The Angeles Clinic & Research Inst.
Los Angeles, California, 90025, United States
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612-9416, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 11065, United States
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
St Luke'S Hospital And Health Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109-1023, United States
Related Publications (2)
Kitano S, Postow MA, Ziegler CG, Kuk D, Panageas KS, Cortez C, Rasalan T, Adamow M, Yuan J, Wong P, Altan-Bonnet G, Wolchok JD, Lesokhin AM. Computational algorithm-driven evaluation of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell frequency for prediction of clinical outcomes. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014 Aug;2(8):812-21. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0013. Epub 2014 May 20.
PMID: 24844912DERIVEDIwama S, De Remigis A, Callahan MK, Slovin SF, Wolchok JD, Caturegli P. Pituitary expression of CTLA-4 mediates hypophysitis secondary to administration of CTLA-4 blocking antibody. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Apr 2;6(230):230ra45. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008002.
PMID: 24695685DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Study Director
- Organization
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2009
First Posted
June 15, 2009
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 20, 2014
Results First Posted
March 6, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05