PRESTIGE Observational Study
1 other identifier
observational
194
8 countries
26
Brief Summary
Prestige artificial disc replacement is an alternative treatment option with 16 years of experience addressing the unmet needs of surgical fusion interventions. Previous studies on the PRESTIGE® cervical disc have proven the safety and effectiveness of artificial disc surgery with level I evidence. The PRESTIGE Observational Study is intended to collect prospectively observational data primarily on the Quality of Life (QoL).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2008
Longer than P75 for all trials
26 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 17, 2015
CompletedJanuary 28, 2016
January 1, 2016
5.6 years
April 1, 2009
December 19, 2014
January 26, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
EQ-5D
The primary objective is the documentation of QoL before and after cervical disc surgery using the PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc System. The QoL will be determined using the EQ-5D questionnaire and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). EQ-5D is an instrument for measuring health outcome and consists of five dimensions: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and a Visual Analog Scale that can be used as a quantitative measure of health as judged by the patient. Each dimension has 3 levels (no problems = 1, some problems = 2, and extreme problems = 3). The EQ-5D index has an upper limit of 1 that indicates full health (indicated by "no problem" in all domains), whereas 0 represents death. Scores worst than 0 are possible, implying that some health states may be worse than death.
2 years
Neck Disability Index (NDI) Score
The primary objective is the documentation of QoL before and after cervical disc surgery using the PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc System. The QoL will be determined using the EQ-5D questionnaire and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The NDI is a self-reported questionnaire designed to provide information on how neck pain affects the patient's ability to manage in everyday life. It contains questions on 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. NDI results can be presented as a raw score or as a percent. When presenting it as a raw score, each section is scored on a 0 to 5 rating scale and the result is summarized to a total score with a maximum score of 50. This raw score can also be doubled and expressed as a percentage. Zero points or 0% means no activity limitations and 50 points or 100% means complete activity limitation.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Duration of Pain Prior to Enrollment
Baseline visit
Intervertebral Disc Space
2 years
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) who are scheduled to receive a cervical arthroplasty.
You may qualify if:
- Patient must be willing to sign a Patient Data Release Form.
- Patient with degenerative disc disease (DDD) who is scheduled to receive a PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc and fulfills the indications according to the product description.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient fulfills any contraindication according to the product description.
- Patient has not reached the age of legal consent according to local laws.
- Patient has diabetes.
- Patient has Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 35.
- Patient has affected disc not between C3/C4 and C6/C7.
- Patient with instability of cervical spine.
- Patients who will receive extensive decompression.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (26)
Hospital Plzen - Lochotin
Pilsen, 32318, Czechia
Hospital Plzen - Lochotin
Pilsen, Czechia
University Clinic Motol
Prague, Czechia
Agia Olga Hospital
Athens, Greece
National Center for Spinal Disorders
Budapest, 1126, Hungary
National Center for Spinal Disorders
Budapest, Hungary
Al-Salam International Hospital
Kuwait City, Kuwait
Razi Hospital for Orthopedic Surgery
Kuwait City, Kuwait
Centrum Rehabilitacji im.prof.M.Weissa "STOCER"
Konstancin-Jeziorna, 05-510, Poland
Centrum Ksztalcenia I Rehabilitcji
Konstancin, 05-510, Poland
Centrum Ksztalcenia I Rehabilitcji
Konstancin, Poland
Centrum Rehabilitacji im.prof. M.Weissa "STOCER"
Konstancin, Poland
State Hospital- Wojewodzkie Centrum
Opole, 45-418, Poland
Specialist Hospital Prof. Alfreda Sokolowskiego
Szczecin, 70-891, Poland
Specialist Hospital Prof. Alfreda Sokolowskiego
Szczecin, Poland
Orthopaedic University Hospital in Zakopane
Zakopane, 34-500, Poland
Orthopaedic University Hospital in Zakopane
Zakopane, Poland
State Hospital- Szpital Wojewodzki
Zielona Góra, 65-046, Poland
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Neurosurgical Clinic KCS
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
Neurosurgical Clinic KCS
Belgrade, Serbia
Clinical Center Nis Neurosurgical Clinic
Niš, 18000, Serbia
Clinical Center Niš
Niš, Serbia
Clinical Center of Vojvodina Neurosurgical Clinic
Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
Clinical Center of Vojvodina
Novi Sad, Serbia
NsP Nové Zámky Hospital
Nové Zamky, Slovakia
Limitations and Caveats
Low patient compliance at the 6 and 12 months follow up visits
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Cristina Faria
- Organization
- MedtronicSpineECA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan Štulik, MUDr
University Clinic Motol
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2009
First Posted
April 3, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
November 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 28, 2016
Results First Posted
March 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2016-01