PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Study
Investigation of the PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc Device at a Single Level for Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
541
1 country
31
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ACD in the single level surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. The primary follow-up information obtained from this clinical investigation are used to support a PMA application for the ACD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2002
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
31 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedMay 10, 2023
May 1, 2023
3.8 years
March 19, 2008
May 9, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary endpoint is overall success, which consists of NDI score, neuro status success, with/without FSU disc ht success, no serious AE classified as "implant/surgical procedure associated", and no secondary surgical procedure classified as failure
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary outcomes are radiographic success, medical outcomes SF-36 patient survey (MCS & PCS) success, neck pain status, arm pain status, patient satisfaction, patient global perceived effect, gait assessment, foraminal compression test
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Control cohort are patients that receive the fusion treatment.
Investigational
EXPERIMENTALThe Investigational cohort are the study patients that received the PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc.
Interventions
The patients that received the control treatment underwent a single level anterior cervical fusion procedure involving allograft bone and the ATLANTIS™ Cervical Plate System.
The PRESTIGE® Cervical Disc is a stainless steel device that was inserted into the intervertebral disc space. The device is composed of two metal plates that interface via a ball and socket mechanism permitting segmental spinal motion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cervical degenerative disc disease defined as:
- intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with at least one of the following items producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression which is documented by patient history (e.g., neck and/or arm pain\], functional deficit, and/or neurological deficit, and radiographic studies (e.g., CT, MRI, x-rays, etc).
- herniated disc;
- osteophyte formation;
- One cervical level requiring surgical treatment;
- C3-C4 disc to C6-C7 disc level of involvement;
- Unresponsive to non-operative treatment for approximately six weeks or has the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression in the face of continued non-operative management;
- No previous surgical intervention at the involved level or any subsequent, planned/staged surgical procedure at the involved or adjacent level(s);
- Is at least 18 years of age, inclusive, at the time of surgery;
- Preoperative Neck Disability Index score \> or = 30;
- Has a preoperative neck pain score of \> 20 based on the Preoperative Neck and Arm Pain Questionnaire.
- If of child-bearing potential, patient is not pregnant at the time of surgery;
- Is willing to comply with the study plan and sign the Patient Informed Consent Form.
You may not qualify if:
- A patient meeting any of the following criteria is to be excluded from the study:
- Has a cervical spinal condition other than symptomatic cervical disc disease requiring surgical treatment at the involved level;
- Documented or diagnosed cervical instability defined by dynamic (flexion/extension) radiographs showing:
- Sagittal plane translation \> 3.5 mm or;
- Sagittal plane angulation \> 20.
- More than one cervical level requiring surgical treatment;
- Has a fused level adjacent to the level to be treated;
- Has severe pathology of the facet joints of the involved vertebral bodies;
- Previous surgical intervention at the involved level;
- Has been previously diagnosed with osteopenia or osteomalacia;
- Has any of the following that may be associated with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (if Yes to any of the below risk factors, a DEXA Scan will be required to determine eligibility):
- Postmenopausal Non-Black female over 60 years of age and weighs less than 140 pounds.
- Postmenopausal female that has sustained a non-traumatic hip, spine, or wrist fracture.
- Male over the age of 70.
- Male over the age of 60 that has sustained a non-traumatic hip or spine fracture.
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (31)
North Alabama Neurological
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States
Montgomery Neurosurgical
Montgomery, Alabama, 36106, United States
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
The Spine Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90403, United States
Orlando Neurosurgery
Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States
Atlanta Brain and Spine Care
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States
Emory Orthop and Spine Center
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States
Hughston Clinic
Columbus, Georgia, 31908, United States
Central Illinois Neuroscience
Bloomington, Illinois, 61701, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Oak Park, Illinois, 60302, United States
Orthoindy
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46278, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Baton Rouge Orth Clinic
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70810, United States
Neurosurgery Ass, P.A.
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237, United States
Michigan Brain & Spine Institute
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197, United States
The Ortho Center of St. Louis
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017, United States
Springfield Neurological Institute
Springfield, Missouri, 65807, United States
Surgical Neurology New Hampshire Neurospine Institute
Bedford, New Hampshire, 03110, United States
Buffalo Neurosurgery Group
West Seneca, New York, 14224, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97201, United States
Westphal Group
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17601, United States
Center of Neurosciences Orthopedics & Spine, P.C.
Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, 57049, United States
Spine Surgery Associates
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421, United States
Semmes Murphey
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104, United States
Howell Allen Clinic
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Brain and Spine Center of Texas
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
Neurosugical Associates, PC
Richmond, Virginia, 23229, United States
Inland Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, P.S.
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
University of Wisconsin Medical School
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
Central Wyoming Neurosurgery
Casper, Wyoming, 82601, United States
Wyoming Brain and Spine Institute
Casper, Wyoming, 82601, United States
Related Publications (5)
Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):308-18. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09513.
PMID: 20809722BACKGROUNDMummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Mar;6(3):198-209. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198.
PMID: 17355018BACKGROUNDGornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Hodges SD, McConnell JR, Dryer RF, Schranck FW, Copay AG. One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years. Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec 31;13(6):551-560. doi: 10.14444/6076. eCollection 2019 Dec.
PMID: 31970051DERIVEDArnold PM, Anderson KK, Selim A, Dryer RF, Kenneth Burkus J. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Sep;25(3):292-302. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE15798. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PMID: 27129045DERIVEDBurkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
PMID: 25036218DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2008
First Posted
March 25, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2002
Primary Completion
July 1, 2006
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05