Efficacy of AMALS in Treating Language Impairment in Children
AMALS
AMALS: Addressing Multiple Aspects of Language Simultaneously: A Randomized Clinical Trial
3 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this proposal is to examine the efficacy of a manualized treatment intervention, AMALS: Addressing Multiple Aspects of Language Simultaneously, which is designed to remediate semantic, morphological, and syntactic aspects of language in preschool children with language impairment. This study will target preschool children with language impairment living in a region characterized by nonmainstream dialects. Questions driving this work are:
- 1.Will children participating in the AMALS treatment exhibit greater semantic, morphological, and syntactic complexity on multiple outcome measures at the completion of the intervention compared to a Discrete Trial Approach (DTA) group?
- 2.Will these gains be maintained at one-month follow up?
- 3.What is the impact of dialect on dependent variables, specifically morphosyntactic abilities?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jan 2009
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 15, 2012
CompletedMay 15, 2012
May 1, 2012
11 months
February 9, 2009
April 13, 2012
May 14, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Language Sample Analysis
Samples were transcribed and segmented by utterance. Each was coded categorically. Reported measures include percentage of utterances at the interpretive/inferential label, percentage of utterances with one or more t-unit (i.e., noun phrase + verb phrase), percentage of utterances that required copula (is/are) or auxiliary (is/are) that were produced.
Language samples were obtained pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at one-month follow-up.
Number of Verb Structures Per Utterance
Samples were transcribed and segmented by utterance. Utterances were analyzed for novel verb structures. Structures were included if they were produced more than one time.
Pre-treatment, post-treatment, 1-month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
AMALS
EXPERIMENTALAddressing multiple aspects of language simultaneously
DTA
EXPERIMENTALDiscrete Trial Approach
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Demonstrate sufficient intelligibility as determined by a score of 85% on percent consonant correct (PCC) measures;
- Demonstrate sufficient phonological ability to use grammatical morphemes as determined by use of word-final /s, z, t, d/ on sound- in-word subtest from the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-2 (GFTA; Goldman \& Fristoe, 2000)
- Nonverbal IQ above 70 as scored on the Columbia Mental Maturity Scale (CMMS; Burgemeister, Blum, \& Lorge, 1972);
- Below 1SD on the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation: Norm-referenced Test (DELV; Seymour, Roeper \& de Villiers, 2005);
- Below 1.39SD on the Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test-Preschool (SPELT-P; Werner \& Kresheck, 1983);
- Documentation from teachers and/or parents of impressions of language status in comparison with peers;
- More than one standard deviation below the mean on both levels 3 and 4 of the Preschool Language Assessment Instrument (PLAI; Blank, Rose, \& Berlin, 1978).
You may not qualify if:
- English as the primary language
- No oral-motor impairment
- No hearing impairment
- No co-morbid psychiatric or neurological impairments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
West Orange Cove Consolidated Independent School District
Orange, Texas, 77631, United States
Little-Cypress Mauriceville Consolidated School District
Orange, Texas, 77632, United States
Port Arthur Independent School District
Port Arthur, Texas, 77640, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Problems with stratification according to dialect prior to randomization lead to difficulty interpreting results related to dialect
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Monica Harn
- Organization
- Lamar University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monica L Bellon-Harn, Ph.D.
Lamar University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Speech and Hearing Services
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2009
First Posted
February 10, 2009
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 15, 2012
Results First Posted
May 15, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05