NCT00814840

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficiency of permanent biventricular pacing using three ventricular leads in terms of reduction in adverse cardiac events rates, improvement in cardiac capacity and patients' functional status in subjects with congestive heart failure and a physiologic (sinus) rhythm.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2008

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 22, 2008

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 25, 2008

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2010

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2016

Status Verified

April 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

December 22, 2008

Last Update Submit

April 12, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Heart failureDyssynchronyCardiac resynchronizationTriple-site pacing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Combined end-point of alive status, freedom from hospitalization for HF or heart transplantation, relative ≥10% increase in LV ejection fraction, ≥10% in VO2max and ≥10% in 6MWD.

    six months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (hospitalization for exacerbated HF requiring modification of pharmacotherapy, heart transplant or death).

    five years

Study Arms (2)

Triple-site group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Triple-site resynchronization group

Device: Triple-site cardiac resynchronization

Standard resynchronization group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard (double-site) resynchronization group

Device: Cardiac resynchronization pacemaker (InSync Sentry or Concerto, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN,USA) with two intracardiac leads

Interventions

Cardiac resynchronization with two intraventricular leads: one in the right ventricle and one in the left ventricle (via the coronary sinus)

Standard resynchronization group

Cardiac resynchronization pacemaker (InSync Sentry or Concerto, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN,USA) with three intraventricular leads: one in the right ventricle and two in the left ventricle (via the coronary sinus). Two left ventricular leads connected with Y-connector (Lead Adaptor 2827, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)

Triple-site group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or more,
  • Congestive heart failure (HF) in NYHA class III-IV within last 90 days despite optimal medical treatment,
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) \<=35% measured with echocardiography,
  • Sinus rhythm \>90% of the time in 24-h Holter monitoring 1-3 days prior to randomization,
  • Inter- or intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony ≥40ms measured with pulse Doppler and tissue Doppler echocardiography,
  • Optimal pharmacotherapy during the last 90 days,
  • Signed informed, written consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding,
  • Unstable HF requiring hospitalization with intravenous inotropic drugs within last 90 days,
  • Myocardial infarction, percutaneous/surgical revascularization or any cardiosurgical procedure within 90 days prior to randomization,
  • Stroke within last 90 days,
  • History of chronic or persistent atrial fibrillation, flutter, tachycardia,
  • Acute myocarditis,
  • Implanted previously pacemaker, ICD or CRT-device,
  • Participation in a concurrent trial that could confuse the results of this study,
  • Mechanical right heart valve,
  • Prior heart transplant,
  • Valvular disease that is indication for valve surgery,
  • Coronary heart disease if percutaneous or surgical revascularization is indicated and possible,
  • Any state, apart from HF, that limits the estimated survival time to \<1 year,
  • Unwillingness or inability to understand the nature of the study, to participate or to give written informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

First Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases

Zabrze, 41-800, Poland

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Kukulski T, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Sokal A, Szulik M, Zielinska T, Kowalczyk J, Pluta S, Sredniawa B, Musialik-Lydka A, Kalarus Z. Mid-term outcomes of triple-site vs. conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: a preliminary study. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Mar 20;133(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Feb 19.

    PMID: 18242737BACKGROUND
  • Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Kukulski T, Szulik M, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Zielinska T, Kowalczyk J, Pluta S, Duszanska A, Sredniawa B, Musialik-Lydka A, Kalarus Z. Triple-site biventricular pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a feasibility study. Europace. 2007 Sep;9(9):762-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum140. Epub 2007 Jul 13.

    PMID: 17631515BACKGROUND
  • Leclercq C, Gadler F, Kranig W, Ellery S, Gras D, Lazarus A, Clementy J, Boulogne E, Daubert JC; TRIP-HF (Triple Resynchronization In Paced Heart Failure Patients) Study Group. A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 15;51(15):1455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.074.

    PMID: 18402900BACKGROUND
  • Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Sredniawa B, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Pluta S, Sokal A, Kukulski T, Stabryla-Deska J, Wozniak A, Kowalczyk J, Zielinska T, Mazurek M, Streb W, Zembala M, Kalarus Z. Triple-site versus standard cardiac resynchronization therapy study (TRUST CRT): clinical rationale, design, and implementation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):658-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01394.x.

    PMID: 19635069BACKGROUND
  • Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Sredniawa B, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Mazurek M, Jedrzejczyk-Patej E, Wozniak A, Pluta S, Glowacki J, Kalarus Z. Implantation feasibility, procedure-related adverse events and lead performance during 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy: a substudy of TRUST CRT randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;23(11):1228-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02375.x. Epub 2012 May 31.

  • Lenarczyk R, Jedrzejczyk-Patej E, Mazurek M, Szulik M, Kowalski O, Pruszkowska P, Sokal A, Sredniawa B, Boidol J, Kowalczyk J, Podolecki T, Mencel G, Kalarus Z. Quality of life in cardiac resynchronization recipients: association with response and impact on outcome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;38(1):8-17. doi: 10.1111/pace.12523. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

  • Kowalczyk J, Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Podolecki T, Francuz P, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Szulik M, Mazurek M, Jedrzejczyk-Patej E, Sredniawa B, Kalarus Z; Triple-Site Versus Standard Cardiac Resynchronization Trial (TRUST CRT) Investigators. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy-incidence and prognostic importance. Sub-analysis of data from randomized TRUST CRT trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;40(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9887-x. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

  • Boidol J, Sredniawa B, Kowalski O, Szulik M, Mazurek M, Sokal A, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Kukulski T, Kalarus Z, Lenarczyk R; Triple-Site Versus Standard Cardiac Resynchronisation Trial (TRUST CRT) Investigators. Many response criteria are poor predictors of outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: validation using data from the randomized trial. Europace. 2013 Jun;15(6):835-44. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus390. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailureHeart Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Radosław Lenarczyk, M.D.

    First Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Zbigniew Kalarus, M.D.

    First Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Primary Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2008

First Posted

December 25, 2008

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2010

Study Completion

January 1, 2015

Last Updated

April 13, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-04

Locations