NCT00508391

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the safety and efficacy of the Lumax HF-T with optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing (OPT) is non-inferior to the Lumax HF-T with simultaneous biventricular pacing (SIM) in patients with heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
122

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2007

Geographic Reach
2 countries

19 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2007

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 26, 2007

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2007

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 18, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

January 26, 2010

Status Verified

January 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

July 26, 2007

Results QC Date

October 27, 2009

Last Update Submit

January 21, 2010

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Subjects Classified as "Not Worsened" for Changes in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and Six-minute Walk Distance Between Periods of Optimized and Simultaneous Biventricular Pacing

    The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of optimized pacing (OPT) compared to simultaneous pacing (SIM). The hypothesis is evaluated based on a responder classification. Subjects are classified "not worsened" if after 30 days of OPT the quality of life (QOL) score is no more than 10 points higher and the six-minute walk distance is no more than 35 meters lower than after 30 days of SIM. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, a 21 question patient-completed survey, was used for QOL. Each question had a possible score of 0 (best) to 5 (worst), for a total of 0 to 105.

    60 days after enrollment

  • Percent of Subjects That Did Not Experience an Adverse Event That Require Additional Invasive Intervention to Resolve, Specifically Related to the Interventricular Delay Feature of the Lumax HF-T Heart Failure Device

    The purpose of primary endpoint two is to evaluate adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, specifically those events that are directly related to the interventricular delay feature of the Lumax HF-T heart failure device. These adverse events include any software issues related to the programming of the interventricular delay or any event that occurs after optimization of the interventricular delay and that can be directly attributed to the use of the feature.

    60 days after enrollment

Study Arms (2)

Simultaneous 1st, Optimized 2nd

EXPERIMENTAL

Lumax HF-T device programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by optimized biventricular pacing for 30 days.

Device: Optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing

Optimized 1st, Simultaneous 2nd

EXPERIMENTAL

Lumax HF-T device programmed to optimized biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by simultaneous biventricular pacing for 30 days.

Device: Optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing

Interventions

Lumax HF-T with optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing

Also known as: Optimized CRT, Interventricular delay
Optimized 1st, Simultaneous 2ndSimultaneous 1st, Optimized 2nd

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Meet the indications for therapy
  • Successfully implanted with a BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D system and have received SIM for a minimum of 30 days prior to enrollment. A successful implantation is defined as having a measured LV pacing threshold which allows for a minimum 1-volt safety margin without any phrenic nerve stimulation at the time of enrollment.
  • Treated with stable and optimal CHF medications, which includes an ACE inhibitor (ACE-I) or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) at therapeutic dose for 1 month prior to enrollment, if tolerated, and a Beta Blocker that is approved and indicated for HF for 3 months prior to enrollment, if tolerated, with a stable dosage for 1 month prior to enrollment. If the patient is intolerant of ACE-I or beta blockers, documented evidence must be available. Eplerenone requires dosage stability for 1 month prior to enrollment. Diuretics may be used as necessary to keep the patient euvolemic. Therapeutic equivalence for ACE-I substitutions is allowed within the enrollment stability timeliness. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or a 50% decrease in dose.
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Able to understand the nature of the study and give informed consent
  • Able to complete all testing required by the clinical protocol, including the 6-minute walk test and QOL questionnaire
  • Available for follow-up visits on a regular basis at the investigational site

You may not qualify if:

  • Meet one or more of the contraindications
  • Have a life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Expected to receive heart transplantation within 6 months
  • Have had more than 1 CHF-related hospitalization within past 30 days
  • Currently receiving IV inotropic medications
  • Chronic atrial fibrillation
  • Enrolled in another cardiovascular or pharmacological clinical investigation, except for FDA required post-market registries
  • Any condition preventing the patient from being able to perform required testing
  • Presence of another life-threatening, underlying illness separate from their cardiac disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (19)

Solano Cardiology

Fairfield, California, 94533, United States

Location

Cardiac Arrhythmia Associates

La Jolla, California, 92307, United States

Location

Sansum Clinic

Santa Barbara, California, 93110, United States

Location

Cardiology Associates Medical Group

Ventura, California, 93003, United States

Location

Cardiac Disease Specialists, P.C.

Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States

Location

Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants

Macon, Georgia, 31201, United States

Location

Fananapazir

Cumberland, Maryland, 21502, United States

Location

St. Elizabeth's Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02135, United States

Location

Michigan Cardiovascular Institute

Saginaw, Michigan, 48601, United States

Location

SSM Medical Group

St Louis, Missouri, 63117, United States

Location

Gateway Cardiology

St Louis, Missouri, 63128, United States

Location

Salem Cardiology

Salem, Oregon, 97302, United States

Location

Palmetto Cardiology

Columbia, South Carolina, 29204, United States

Location

Pee Dee Cardiology

Florence, South Carolina, 29505, United States

Location

Cardiology Consultants

Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States

Location

Lone Star Heart Center

Amarillo, Texas, 79106, United States

Location

Cardiac Associates of Dallas

Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States

Location

Yakima Heart Center

Yakima, Washington, 98902, United States

Location

University Hospital Zurich

Zurich, Switzerland, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clay Cohorn
Organization
BIOTRONIK, Inc.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2007

First Posted

July 30, 2007

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

August 1, 2009

Last Updated

January 26, 2010

Results First Posted

January 18, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-01

Locations