Interventricular Delay of Lumax HF-T for Heart Failure
Clinical Investigation to Study Safety and Efficacy of the Interventricular Delay Feature of the Lumax HF-T Device for Heart Failure.
1 other identifier
interventional
122
2 countries
19
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the safety and efficacy of the Lumax HF-T with optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing (OPT) is non-inferior to the Lumax HF-T with simultaneous biventricular pacing (SIM) in patients with heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jul 2007
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 18, 2010
CompletedJanuary 26, 2010
January 1, 2010
1.4 years
July 26, 2007
October 27, 2009
January 21, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Subjects Classified as "Not Worsened" for Changes in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and Six-minute Walk Distance Between Periods of Optimized and Simultaneous Biventricular Pacing
The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of optimized pacing (OPT) compared to simultaneous pacing (SIM). The hypothesis is evaluated based on a responder classification. Subjects are classified "not worsened" if after 30 days of OPT the quality of life (QOL) score is no more than 10 points higher and the six-minute walk distance is no more than 35 meters lower than after 30 days of SIM. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, a 21 question patient-completed survey, was used for QOL. Each question had a possible score of 0 (best) to 5 (worst), for a total of 0 to 105.
60 days after enrollment
Percent of Subjects That Did Not Experience an Adverse Event That Require Additional Invasive Intervention to Resolve, Specifically Related to the Interventricular Delay Feature of the Lumax HF-T Heart Failure Device
The purpose of primary endpoint two is to evaluate adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, specifically those events that are directly related to the interventricular delay feature of the Lumax HF-T heart failure device. These adverse events include any software issues related to the programming of the interventricular delay or any event that occurs after optimization of the interventricular delay and that can be directly attributed to the use of the feature.
60 days after enrollment
Study Arms (2)
Simultaneous 1st, Optimized 2nd
EXPERIMENTALLumax HF-T device programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by optimized biventricular pacing for 30 days.
Optimized 1st, Simultaneous 2nd
EXPERIMENTALLumax HF-T device programmed to optimized biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by simultaneous biventricular pacing for 30 days.
Interventions
Lumax HF-T with optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Meet the indications for therapy
- Successfully implanted with a BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D system and have received SIM for a minimum of 30 days prior to enrollment. A successful implantation is defined as having a measured LV pacing threshold which allows for a minimum 1-volt safety margin without any phrenic nerve stimulation at the time of enrollment.
- Treated with stable and optimal CHF medications, which includes an ACE inhibitor (ACE-I) or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) at therapeutic dose for 1 month prior to enrollment, if tolerated, and a Beta Blocker that is approved and indicated for HF for 3 months prior to enrollment, if tolerated, with a stable dosage for 1 month prior to enrollment. If the patient is intolerant of ACE-I or beta blockers, documented evidence must be available. Eplerenone requires dosage stability for 1 month prior to enrollment. Diuretics may be used as necessary to keep the patient euvolemic. Therapeutic equivalence for ACE-I substitutions is allowed within the enrollment stability timeliness. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or a 50% decrease in dose.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Able to understand the nature of the study and give informed consent
- Able to complete all testing required by the clinical protocol, including the 6-minute walk test and QOL questionnaire
- Available for follow-up visits on a regular basis at the investigational site
You may not qualify if:
- Meet one or more of the contraindications
- Have a life expectancy of less than 6 months
- Expected to receive heart transplantation within 6 months
- Have had more than 1 CHF-related hospitalization within past 30 days
- Currently receiving IV inotropic medications
- Chronic atrial fibrillation
- Enrolled in another cardiovascular or pharmacological clinical investigation, except for FDA required post-market registries
- Any condition preventing the patient from being able to perform required testing
- Presence of another life-threatening, underlying illness separate from their cardiac disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Biotronik, Inc.lead
Study Sites (19)
Solano Cardiology
Fairfield, California, 94533, United States
Cardiac Arrhythmia Associates
La Jolla, California, 92307, United States
Sansum Clinic
Santa Barbara, California, 93110, United States
Cardiology Associates Medical Group
Ventura, California, 93003, United States
Cardiac Disease Specialists, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309, United States
Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants
Macon, Georgia, 31201, United States
Fananapazir
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502, United States
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02135, United States
Michigan Cardiovascular Institute
Saginaw, Michigan, 48601, United States
SSM Medical Group
St Louis, Missouri, 63117, United States
Gateway Cardiology
St Louis, Missouri, 63128, United States
Salem Cardiology
Salem, Oregon, 97302, United States
Palmetto Cardiology
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204, United States
Pee Dee Cardiology
Florence, South Carolina, 29505, United States
Cardiology Consultants
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Lone Star Heart Center
Amarillo, Texas, 79106, United States
Cardiac Associates of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States
Yakima Heart Center
Yakima, Washington, 98902, United States
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clay Cohorn
- Organization
- BIOTRONIK, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2007
First Posted
July 30, 2007
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 26, 2010
Results First Posted
January 18, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-01