Evaluation of a Diagnostic Feature in a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Device
CLEPSYDRA
Clinical Evaluation of the Physiological Diagnosis Function in the Paradym CRT Device
1 other identifier
interventional
520
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a new sensor-based diagnostic feature, which has been implemented in a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device. This trial will study the effectiveness of the diagnostic feature to detect heart failure events in medically stable, ICD-indicated, congestive heart failure patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2009
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedMay 15, 2014
May 1, 2014
1.6 years
August 10, 2009
May 14, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sensitivity of diagnostic feature in detecting heart failure events (using the device) in comparison to clinical heart failure events experienced by the patient (as classified by an independent committee).
Thirteen months
Mean number of false positives per patient per year.
Thirteen Months
Study Arms (1)
CRT Therapy
EXPERIMENTALAll patients will receive CRT therapy with the Physiological Diagnosis (PhD) feature enabled.
Interventions
All subjects will undergo CRT therapy with the Physiological Diagnosis (PhD) feature enabled.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject eligible for implantation of a CRT-D device according to current available guidelines for cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Subject has severe heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV)
- Subject has experienced at least one heart failure event within six months prior to enrollment
- Subject continues to have heart failure symptoms despite receiving optimal medical therapy
- Schedule for implant of a PARADYM CRT-D (Model 8770)
- Subject has signed and dated an informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Any contraindication for standard cardiac pacing
- Any contraindication for ICD therapy
- Abdominal implantation site
- Hypertrophic or obstructive cardiomyopathy
- Acute myocarditis
- Unstable coronary symptoms (unstable angina or myocardial infarction) within the last month
- Recent (within the last month) or planned cardiac revascularization or coronary angioplasty
- Correctable valvular disease that is the primary cause of heart failure
- Mechanical tricuspid valve
- Receiving continuous intra-venous infusion of positive inotropic therapy or intermittent therapy (intravenous infusion) more than twice per week
- Heart transplant recipient
- Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis
- Already included in another clinical study
- Life expectancy less than 12 months
- Inability to understand the purpose of the study or refusal to cooperate
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ELA Medical, Inc.lead
- LivaNovacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mountain Vista Hospital
Mesa, Arizona, 85209, United States
Related Publications (1)
Auricchio A, Brugada J, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Leyva F; CLEPSYDRA investigators. Assessment of a novel device-based diagnostic algorithm to monitor patient status in moderate-to-severe heart failure: rationale and design of the CLEPSYDRA study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Dec;12(12):1363-71. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq170. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
PMID: 20947571BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2009
First Posted
August 12, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2011
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 15, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05