Value of Urodynamic Evaluation
ValUE
A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing Before Stress-Incontinence Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
630
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Although no reliable and specific figures are available for the total expenditure on UDS, UDS is commonly performed for patients with urinary incontinence (UI) regardless of gender and age. UDS is typically performed prior to incontinence surgery. Urodynamic studies are expensive, time-consuming, and uncomfortable diagnostic investigations. The 3rd ICI reported insufficient evidence with which to answer the following key research questions related to UDS: 1) Do physicians alter clinical decision-making based on results of UDS?, and 2) Do alterations in clinical decisions made in response to UDS results improve the clinical outcomes?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Nov 2008
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 6, 2013
CompletedAugust 6, 2013
July 1, 2013
1.1 years
December 5, 2008
May 7, 2013
July 3, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self-reported Urinary Incontinence, Irritative and Obstructive Symptoms: Reduction of 70%+ in the Urogenital Distress Inventory From Baseline to 12 Mos and "Very Much" or "Much" Better on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Measure at 12 Mos.
Treatment success is defined as a reduction in the Urogenital Distress Inventory score from baseline to 12 months of 70% or more and a Patient Global Impression of Improvement response of "very much better" or "much better" at 12 months.
12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Percentage Meeting or Exceeding 70% Decrease in UDI Score Between Baseline and 12 Months
Baseline, 12 mos
Patient Global Impression Index
12 Months
Change in Bother as Measured by the UDI
Baseline, 12 Months
Change in Severity as Measured by the ISI
Baseline & 12 Months
Change in MESA Stress Score
Screen & 12 Months
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
No UDS
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen desiring surgery for diagnosed, uncomplicated predominant stress urinary incontinence (UI) who receive a basic office evaluation only.
UDS
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen desiring surgery for diagnosed, uncomplicated predominant stress urinary incontinence (UI) who receive a basic office evaluation with preoperative urodynamic studies prior to surgery.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- Predominant SUI as evidenced by all of the following:
- Self-reported stress-type UI symptoms, of duration \>3 months\*
- MESA stress symptom score (percent of total possible stress score) greater than MESA urge symptom score (percent of total possible urge score)
- Observation of leakage by provocative stress test at any volume
- Eligible for randomization to either treatment group
- Eligible for SUI surgery
- Desires non-conservative therapy for SUI
- PVR \<150ml by any method. (May repeat once if initial measure is abnormal)
- Negative urine dipstick (negative result = trace or less for leukocytes \& nitrites) or negative UA or negative culture
- Available to initiate SUI treatment within 6 weeks of randomization
- Available for 12-months of follow-up and able to complete study assessments, per clinician judgment.
- Signed consent form.
- Patient can be rescreened after respective time interval has been met.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<21 years\*
- Currently undergoing or has had recommended treatment of apical or anterior prolapse
- No anterior or apical prolapse \> +1 on standing straining prolapse exam
- Pregnant or has not completed child bearing.
- \<12 months post-partum\*â€
- Active malignancy of cervix, uterus, fallopian tube(s) or ovary \> Stage I, or bladder of any Stage
- History of pelvic radiation therapy
- Previous incontinence surgery
- Current catheter use
- Neurological disease known to affect bladder storage (e.g. MS, Parkinsonism, CVA)
- Previous (i.e. repaired) or current urethral diverticulum
- Prior augmentation cystoplasty or artificial sphincter
- Implanted nerve stimulators for urinary symptoms or previous botox bladder injections.
- Any pelvic surgery within the last 3 months\*
- Previous placement of synthetic mesh on a vaginal approach in the anterior compartment
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Carelon Researchlead
- University of Alabama at Birminghamcollaborator
- University of California, San Diegocollaborator
- University of Marylandcollaborator
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centercollaborator
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antoniocollaborator
- University of Utahcollaborator
- Beaumont Hospitalcollaborator
- Loyola Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (10)
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
University of California
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Oakwood Hospital/Cancer Center
Dearborn, Michigan, 48123, United States
Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
University of Texas Health Sciences Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Related Publications (3)
Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C, Sirls LT, Norton PA, Arisco AM, Chai TC, Zimmern P, Barber MD, Dandreo KJ, Menefee SA, Kenton K, Lowder J, Richter HE, Khandwala S, Nygaard I, Kraus SR, Johnson HW, Lemack GE, Mihova M, Albo ME, Mueller E, Sutkin G, Wilson TS, Hsu Y, Rozanski TA, Rickey LM, Rahn D, Tennstedt S, Kusek JW, Gormley EA; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1987-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113595. Epub 2012 May 2.
PMID: 22551104BACKGROUNDNager CW, Brubaker L, Daneshgari F, Litman HJ, Dandreo KJ, Sirls L, Lemack GE, Richter HE, Leng W, Norton P, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Chang D, Amundsen CL, Stoddard AM, Tennstedt SL; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: A non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
PMID: 19635587RESULTNorton PA, Nager CW, Brubaker L, Lemack GE, Sirls LT, Holley R, Chai TC, Kraus SR, Zyczynski H, Smith B, Stoddard A; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. The cost of preoperative urodynamics: A secondary analysis of the ValUE trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jan;35(1):81-4. doi: 10.1002/nau.22684. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
PMID: 25327775DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Heather Litman, PhD
- Organization
- New England Research Institutes
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ann Gormley, MD
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2008
First Posted
December 8, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 6, 2013
Results First Posted
August 6, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07