Comparison of Body and Room Temperature Saline in Urodynamics
Comparison of Urodynamic Volume Measurements Using Room and Body Temperature Saline
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare first urge, strong urge, and maximum capacity, and perception of discomfort during urodynamic testing between room temperature and body temperate saline. Twenty-four non-pregnant females referred to the urogynecology clinic for bladder testing will be enrolled into the study. Each patient will serve as her own control, undergoing the bladder testing with both room temperature and body temperature saline.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jul 2006
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2006
CompletedJuly 24, 2006
July 1, 2006
July 20, 2006
July 20, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
first urge
strong urge
maximum urge
Secondary Outcomes (1)
patient comfort (Likert scale)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females referred to gynecology clinic for urodynamics evaluation with an appropriate indication for bladder testing
You may not qualify if:
- Male subjects and pregnant females
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tripler Army Medical Center
TAMC, Hawaii, 96859, United States
Related Publications (1)
1. Klevmark, B, Volume threshold for micturation: Influence of filing rate on sensory and motor bladder function, Scandanavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology Supplementum 2002; 210:6-10 2. Wyandaele, J, The normal pattern of perception of bladder filling during cystometry studied in 38 young healthy volunteers, Journal of Urology 1998; 160(2):479-81 3. Pauwels, E, DeWatcher, S, Wyndaele, J, Normality of bladder filling studied in symptom-free middle-aged woman, Clinical Urology 2004; 171(4):1567-70 4. Chin-peuckert, L, Komlos, M, Rennick, J, Jednak, R, Capolicchio, J, Salle, J, What is the variability between two concescutive cystometries in the same child?, Clinical Urology 2003; 170(4):1614-7 5. Goodman, T, Kilborn, T, Pearce, R. Warm or cold contrast medium in the micturating cystourethrogram: which is best?, Clinical Radiology 2003; 58(7):551-4
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2006
First Posted
July 24, 2006
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Study Completion
July 1, 2006
Last Updated
July 24, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-07