Study Stopped
Feasibility Period ended.
Mixed Incontinence: Medical Or Surgical Approach?
MIMOSA
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare treatment outcomes for patients with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) for whom therapy is initiated with surgery to those for whom therapy is initiated with non-surgical treatment. Women who are bothered by symptoms of both stress and urge incontinence will be randomly assigned to initiate treatment with a surgical (surgery for stress incontinence) vs. a non-surgical (drug and behavioral therapy) approach. Follow-up will be a minimum of 12 Months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Oct 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 11, 2012
CompletedMay 10, 2013
May 1, 2013
5 months
December 4, 2008
March 26, 2012
May 8, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Optimal Outcome of Treatment at 6 Months
Composite measure defined as "much better" or "very much better" on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and "normal" or "mild" on Patient Global Impression of Symptoms (PGI-S). PGI-I is a single item: "Circle the one answer that best describes your urinary tract condition now, compared to how it was before your incontinence treatment" with responses ranging from 1= "Very much better" to 7= "Very much worse." The PGI-S is a single item:; "Circle the one number that best describes how your urinary tract condition is now" with responses ranging from 1 = "Normal" to 4 "Severe".
6 Months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Optimal Outcome of Treatment at 3 Months
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Surgical Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgical treatment will consist of the following evidence-based stress incontinence procedures: mid-urethral slings (TVT, TOT, TVT-O), fascial slings, and Burch colposuspension.
Non Surgical Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe non-surgical treatment will include two components: 1. Pharmacological therapy with any FDA approved overactive bladder (OAB) drug in approved doses; and 2. Behavioral therapy.
Interventions
Both oral urge incontinence medication and behavioral treatment
Initial surgical (stress incontinence surgery) treatment approach.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- Mixed UI as evidenced by stress and urge symptoms reported on MESA (either percent of urge-type symptoms ≥ the percent of stress-type symptoms or urge symptom score ≥7 if stress predominant) followed by report of "moderately" or "greatly"/"quite a bit" bothered to questions 2 and 3 of the 6-item Urinary Distress Index (UDI-6) or questions 16 and 17 of the 20-item Pelvic Fl;oor Distress Index (PFDI-20), respectively (See Appendix C)
- Moderate or severe UI as evidenced by the corresponding response on the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
- Incontinence symptoms present for at least (3) months\*
- Bladder capacity \> 200cc (by any method)
- Urodynamic Stress Incontinence
- Eligible for both treatment interventions
- Available to start intervention within 6 weeks
- Negative urine dipstick (negative result = trace or less for leukocytes \& nitrites)
- Available for 12 months of follow-up and able to complete study assessments as per clinician judgment
- Signed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<21 years\*
- Currently undergoing or recommended to undergo treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
- Other indicated/planned concomitant surgery
- Pregnant or has not completed child bearing\*
- \<12 months post-partum\*†
- Active malignancy of cervix, uterus, fallopian tube(s) or ovary \> Stage I, or bladder of any Stage
- Current catheter use
- Unevaluated hematuria
- Participation in another trial that may influence the results of this study
- Patient can be rescreened after respective time interval has been met. †"Partum" is defined as a delivery or other termination that occurs after 20 weeks gestation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Carelon Researchlead
- University of Alabama at Birminghamcollaborator
- University of California, San Diegocollaborator
- University of Marylandcollaborator
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
- University of Texascollaborator
- The University of Texas at San Antoniocollaborator
- University of Utahcollaborator
- Beaumont Hospitalcollaborator
- Loyola Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (10)
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
University of California
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Oakwood Hospital/Cancer Center
Dearborn, Michigan, 48123, United States
Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
University of Texas Health Sciences Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Related Publications (1)
Brubaker L, Moalli P, Richter HE, Albo M, Sirls L, Chai T, Kraus SR, Norton P, Chang D, Tennstedt SL. Challenges in designing a pragmatic clinical trial: the mixed incontinence -- medical or surgical approach (MIMOSA) trial experience. Clin Trials. 2009 Aug;6(4):355-64. doi: 10.1177/1740774509339239. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
PMID: 19625327BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination leading to small numbers of participants for data analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anne M. Stoddard
- Organization
- New England Resesarch Institutes
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ann Gormley, MD
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2008
First Posted
December 5, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2009
Study Completion
March 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 10, 2013
Results First Posted
May 11, 2012
Record last verified: 2013-05