NCT03470116

Brief Summary

The MILAR trial is a multicenter randomised , prospective, controlled, single-blind, superiority French clinical trial, with a 1: 1 distribution of patients to compare intubation during the first laryngoscopy between the MacGrath MAC videolaryngoscope and the MacIntosh laryngoscope for patients with less than 2 criteria of difficult intubation in elective surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 13, 2018

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 19, 2018

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 20, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 23, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 23, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 25, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

March 13, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 24, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

MacGrath MACcurarizationintubationMacIntoshlaryngoscope

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Successful first attempt intubation after curarization

    The primary endpoint is the success of tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists or registrated nurse anesthetists on exposure to first laryngoscopy, confirmed by three identical capnographic curves on the monitor.

    2 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Presence of glottal exposure during the first laryngoscopy

    2 minutes

  • Use of a second laryngoscopy

    2 minutes

  • Type of laryngoscope used in second laryngoscopy

    2 minutes

  • Use of a mandrel

    2 minutes

  • Use of a supra-glottal device

    2 minutes

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

MacGrath MAC video laryngoscopy

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will benefit MacGrath MAC video laryngoscopy for intubation after curarization

Device: Laryngoscopy with Mac Grath

direct laryngoscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will benefit direct laryngoscopy for intubation after curarization

Device: direct laryngoscopy

Interventions

Patients of this group will benefit MacGrath MAC video laryngoscopy for intubation after curarization

MacGrath MAC video laryngoscopy

Patients of this group will benefit direct laryngoscopy for intubation after curarization

direct laryngoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • less than 2 criteria of difficult intubation admitted to the operating theater for scheduled surgery requiring orotracheal intubation after curarization - informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnancy
  • age \< 18
  • contraindication to oro-tracheal intubation
  • emergency surgery
  • thoracic surgery
  • naso-tracheal intubation
  • patient protected by law
  • patient not affiliated to french social security
  • BMI\> 45kg / m²
  • Predicted patient with difficult intubation
  • Patients considered to be predisposed to difficult intubation are those with a history of difficult intubation, or with 2 criteria among:
  • Mallampati 3 or 4
  • Thyroid-chin distance \<65mm
  • Mouth opening \<35mm
  • Spinal extension less than 90 °
  • +5 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Chartres Hospital Center

Chartres, 28630, France

Location

Orleans Hospital Center

Orléans, 45067, France

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):632-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer059. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

    PMID: 21447489BACKGROUND
  • Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, Chiba T, Watase H, Brown CA 3rd, Brown DF; Japanese Emergency Medicine Research Alliance Investigators. Association between repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):749-754.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

    PMID: 22542734BACKGROUND
  • Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):607-13, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15.

    PMID: 15271750BACKGROUND
  • Sakles JC, Javedani PP, Chase E, Garst-Orozco J, Guillen-Rodriguez JM, Stolz U. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):700-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12674. Epub 2015 May 20.

    PMID: 25996773BACKGROUND
  • Kaplan A, Goksu E, Yildiz G, Kilic T. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study. J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;50(3):e107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.070. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

    PMID: 26725922BACKGROUND
  • Ruetzler K, Imach S, Weiss M, Haas T, Schmidt AR. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer]. Anaesthesist. 2015 Jul;64(7):513-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0051-5. Epub 2015 Jul 15. German.

    PMID: 26174747BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Laryngoscopy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • MFAM Willy Serge, MD

    ORLEANS REGIONAL HOSPITAL CENTER

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • SINDA Patrick, MD

    CHARTRES HOSPITAL CENTER

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2018

First Posted

March 19, 2018

Study Start

March 20, 2018

Primary Completion

September 23, 2019

Study Completion

September 23, 2019

Last Updated

March 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations