Comparison Between the MacGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope and the MacIntosh Laryngoscope for Oro-tracheal Intubation for Patients With Less Than 2 Criteria of Difficult Intubation in Elective Surgery.
MILAR
MILAR, is a Controlled, Randomised, Comparative, Prospective, Multi-center, Superiority French Clinical Trial Comparing the MacGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope and the MacIntosh Laryngoscope for Oro-tracheal Intubation by Patients With Less Than 2 Criteria of Difficult Intubation in Elective Surgery.
1 other identifier
interventional
1,250
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The MILAR trial is a multicenter randomised , prospective, controlled, single-blind, superiority French clinical trial, with a 1: 1 distribution of patients to compare intubation during the first laryngoscopy between the MacGrath MAC videolaryngoscope and the MacIntosh laryngoscope for patients with less than 2 criteria of difficult intubation in elective surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 23, 2019
CompletedMarch 25, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.5 years
March 13, 2018
March 24, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful first attempt intubation after curarization
The primary endpoint is the success of tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists or registrated nurse anesthetists on exposure to first laryngoscopy, confirmed by three identical capnographic curves on the monitor.
2 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Presence of glottal exposure during the first laryngoscopy
2 minutes
Use of a second laryngoscopy
2 minutes
Type of laryngoscope used in second laryngoscopy
2 minutes
Use of a mandrel
2 minutes
Use of a supra-glottal device
2 minutes
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MacGrath MAC video laryngoscopy
EXPERIMENTALPatients will benefit MacGrath MAC video laryngoscopy for intubation after curarization
direct laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will benefit direct laryngoscopy for intubation after curarization
Interventions
Patients of this group will benefit MacGrath MAC video laryngoscopy for intubation after curarization
Patients of this group will benefit direct laryngoscopy for intubation after curarization
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- less than 2 criteria of difficult intubation admitted to the operating theater for scheduled surgery requiring orotracheal intubation after curarization - informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- age \< 18
- contraindication to oro-tracheal intubation
- emergency surgery
- thoracic surgery
- naso-tracheal intubation
- patient protected by law
- patient not affiliated to french social security
- BMI\> 45kg / m²
- Predicted patient with difficult intubation
- Patients considered to be predisposed to difficult intubation are those with a history of difficult intubation, or with 2 criteria among:
- Mallampati 3 or 4
- Thyroid-chin distance \<65mm
- Mouth opening \<35mm
- Spinal extension less than 90 °
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Chartres Hospital Center
Chartres, 28630, France
Orleans Hospital Center
Orléans, 45067, France
Related Publications (6)
Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):632-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer059. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
PMID: 21447489BACKGROUNDHasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, Chiba T, Watase H, Brown CA 3rd, Brown DF; Japanese Emergency Medicine Research Alliance Investigators. Association between repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):749-754.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
PMID: 22542734BACKGROUNDMort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):607-13, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15.
PMID: 15271750BACKGROUNDSakles JC, Javedani PP, Chase E, Garst-Orozco J, Guillen-Rodriguez JM, Stolz U. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):700-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12674. Epub 2015 May 20.
PMID: 25996773BACKGROUNDKaplan A, Goksu E, Yildiz G, Kilic T. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study. J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;50(3):e107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.070. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
PMID: 26725922BACKGROUNDRuetzler K, Imach S, Weiss M, Haas T, Schmidt AR. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer]. Anaesthesist. 2015 Jul;64(7):513-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0051-5. Epub 2015 Jul 15. German.
PMID: 26174747BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
MFAM Willy Serge, MD
ORLEANS REGIONAL HOSPITAL CENTER
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
SINDA Patrick, MD
CHARTRES HOSPITAL CENTER
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2018
First Posted
March 19, 2018
Study Start
March 20, 2018
Primary Completion
September 23, 2019
Study Completion
September 23, 2019
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share