Study of Milk Allergy and Tolerance in Children
Dietary Intervention in Milk Allergy and Tolerance Development
1 other identifier
interventional
170
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if children who are allergic to milk can increase tolerance through frequent dose-escalation every 6 months versus 12 months leading to eventual tolerance of less heated milk and ultimately unheated milk.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 30, 2016
CompletedMarch 30, 2016
March 1, 2016
6.3 years
October 21, 2008
December 17, 2015
March 29, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With a Positive Progression in Tolerance of Baked Milk and Ultimately Unheated Milk in Dose Escalation Sub-arm Compared to Maintenance Sub-arm
Participants were grouped based on the food to which they experienced a reaction at the baseline Oral Food Challenge (OFC). Group 1=reacted to muffin; Group 2=reacted to pizza; Group 3=reacted to rice pudding; Group 4=reacted to non-baked milk; Group 5=did not react. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were randomized to dose escalation or maintenance, and at each visit following randomization, participants performed an OFC where they were given food products containing milk protein denatured through baking. Participants were given progressively less denatured milk protein food items until they had an allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have a positive progression in tolerance of baked milk if they experienced a reaction to a less denatured milk protein food item at any post randomization visits than the one to which they reacted at their baseline visit.
Randomization through end of study (up to 36 months)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Number of Participants With a Positive Progression in Tolerating More Allergenic Forms of Milk at 12 and 24 Months
12 months, 24 months
Percent of Participants Becoming Tolerant to Unheated Cow's Milk at 12, 24, and 36 Months
12 months, 24 months, and 36 months
Percent of Participants Becoming Tolerant to Unheated Cow's Milk
Randomization through end of study (up to 36 months)
Comparison of Baseline Basophil Percent Maximal Degranulation With the Outcome of the Baseline OFC to Identify the Biomarkers of Clinical Reactivity
Baseline
Comparison of Baseline IgE With the Outcome of the Baseline OFC to Identify the Biomarkers of Clinical Reactivity
Baseline
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Milk-allergic; Non-consumption
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in this arm reacted to the lowest baseline dose of baked milk (muffin) and will continue strict milk avoidance, returning for re-evaluation with laboratory tests at 12 and 24 months and baked milk challenge at 36 months. Individual participants may be challenged at 12 and or 24 months.
Tolerated Muffin, Reacted to Pizza
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will be assigned to this arm, if they can tolerate ingesting a muffin but react to ingesting the amount of baked milk in a standardized portion of pizza. Within the arm, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either return for re-evaluation at 6 months (Dose Escalation sub-arm) or 12 months (Maintenance sub-arm) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein.
Reacted to Rice Pudding
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will be assigned to this arm, if they can tolerate ingesting a muffin and a standardized portion of pizza but react to a standardized dose of baked milk in rice pudding. Within the arm, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either return for re-evaluation at 6 months (Dose Escalation sub-arm) or 12 months (Maintenance sub-arm) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein.
Reacted to Non-baked Milk
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will be assigned to this arm, if they can tolerate ingesting a muffin, pizza and rice pudding but react to a standardized dose of non-baked milk. Within the arm, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either return for re-evaluation at 6 months (Dose Escalation sub-arm) or 12 months (Maintenance sub-arm) to determine whether they might progress to ingesting higher amounts of baked milk protein.
Tolerant to Baked and Non-baked Milk
EXPERIMENTALBiological/Vaccine: Baked Milk At baseline, each subject will undergo sequential oral food challenges with the products that contain increasing amounts of milk protein that are baked: Stage 1 (muffin), Stage 2 (pizza), and Stage 3 (rice pudding) doses of baked milk to determine the extent to which they tolerate various baked milk proteins. Based on the outcomes of the baseline oral food challenges, subjects will be assigned to one of the 5 study arms. Biological/Vaccine: Non-baked Milk Those subjects tolerant to rice pudding will undergo oral food challenge with non-baked milk.
Non-Interventional Comparison
NO INTERVENTIONThirty subjects who fulfill inclusion criteria but are unwilling to participate in the full protocol will be enrolled as a comparison group to the active arms.
Interventions
At baseline, each subject will undergo sequential oral food challenges with the products that contain increasing amounts of milk protein that are baked: Stage 1 (muffin), Stage 2 (pizza), and Stage 3 (rice pudding) doses of baked milk to determine the extent to which they tolerate various baked milk proteins. Based on the outcomes of the baseline oral food challenges, subjects will be assigned to one of the 5 study arms.
Those subjects tolerant to rice pudding will undergo oral food challenge with non-baked milk.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Convincing history of an allergic reaction to milk or a positive double blind placebo controlled milk challenge (DBPCMC) within the past 2 years and either detectable milk immunoglobulin E (IgE) or positive prick skin test to milk OR
- Serum milk-IgE of high predictive value \>14 kUa/L or prick skin test to milk \> 10mm wheal within the past 6 months regardless of past clinical history of reactions OR
- Convincing history of an allergic reaction to milk or a positive DBPCMC more than 2 years ago and either a positive serum milk-IgE \< 14 kUA/L or positive prick skin test to milk \< 10 mm wheal within the past 6 months (eligible only for the active arm of the study and will undergo a reversed sequence of initial baked-milk challenges)
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or unwillingness of a participant to give written informed consent or to comply with study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Related Publications (4)
Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Bloom KA, Sicherer SH, Shreffler WG, Noone S, Wanich N, Sampson HA. Tolerance to extensively heated milk in children with cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2):342-7, 347.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.043. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
PMID: 18620743BACKGROUNDSkripak JM, Matsui EC, Mudd K, Wood RA. The natural history of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.023. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
PMID: 17935766BACKGROUNDStaden U, Rolinck-Werninghaus C, Brewe F, Wahn U, Niggemann B, Beyer K. Specific oral tolerance induction in food allergy in children: efficacy and clinical patterns of reaction. Allergy. 2007 Nov;62(11):1261-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01501.x.
PMID: 17919140BACKGROUNDVandenplas Y, Koletzko S, Isolauri E, Hill D, Oranje AP, Brueton M, Staiano A, Dupont C. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cow's milk protein allergy in infants. Arch Dis Child. 2007 Oct;92(10):902-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.110999.
PMID: 17895338BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Research Operations Program
- Organization
- DAIT/NIAID
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hugh A. Sampson, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- STUDY CHAIR
Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2008
First Posted
October 23, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 30, 2016
Results First Posted
March 30, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03