Mechanisms of Desensitization During Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
PnOIT4
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to attempt to understand how desensitization works in peanut allergic children who are undergoing oral immunotherapy (OIT) to peanut. We want to identify the early changes in the desensitization process the immune cells undergo to become desensitized to the peanut protein.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Apr 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 13, 2017
CompletedMarch 1, 2018
March 1, 2017
2.7 years
March 15, 2013
January 22, 2017
February 27, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Subjects Who Develop Desensitization
The percentage of peanut allergic subjects who develop desensitization as defined by being able to consume 5000mg of peanut protein during a double blind food challenge after completing a build-up phase of peanut OIT.
40 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintain Desensitization Once OIT is Stopped
4 weeks
Other Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in the Wheal Diameter, as Assessed by the Skin Prick Test (SPT) to Peanut
44 weeks
Change in Peanut Specific Immunoglobin E (IgE) From Baseline Until Desensitization Food Challenge
44 weeks
Change in Immunoglobin G4 (IgG4) to Peanut From Baseline Until Desensitization Food Challenge
44 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Open label peanut OIT
EXPERIMENTALOpen label orally ingested peanut flour with maintenance dose of 1450mg
Interventions
Subject will take increasing amounts of peanut protein up to a maximum maintenace dose of 1450mg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 4 to up to 12 years of age of any gender, race, or ethnicity.
- Minimum weight 16 kg at the time of enrollment.
- Physician diagnosis of peanut allergy OR convincing clinical history of an allergic reaction to peanut.
- Detectable serum peanut -specific IgE level (CAP-FEIA ≥ 0.35 kU/L) and a positive SPT (wheal ≥ 3mm on skin prick test to peanut extract compared to a negative control.)
- Allergic reaction to ≤ 1 gm peanut protein during a blinded oral challenge test conducted at screening (e.g., a double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge \[DBPCFC\]).
- Written informed consent from parent/guardian.
- Written assent from subject if applicable
- Consumption of oat-containing product within 90 days prior to enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- History of allergic reaction to peanut consistent with severe anaphylaxis (defined as hypotension/shock; or neurologic impairment).
- Chronic disease other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis requiring therapy; e.g., heart disease or diabetes.
- Active eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years
- Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of food allergy in the 6 months prior to visit -1
- Inhalant allergen immunotherapy that has not yet reached maintenance dosing.
- Asthma defined as moderate or severe persistent by National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Guidelines (e.g. asthma that requires more than fluticasone 440 mcg or its equivalent daily for adequate control).
- Inability to discontinue antihistamines for skin testing, OFC and the initial dose escalation.
- Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) in the 12 months prior to visit -1.
- Any systemic therapy which in the judgment of the investigator could be immunomodulatory (e.g. rituximab) in the 12 months prior to visit -1, Systemic corticosteroid therapy of up to a total of three weeks is allowed.
- Use of investigational drug in 90 days prior to visit -1.
- Plan to use any investigational drug during the study period.
- The presence of any medical condition that the investigator deems incompatible with participation in the trial.
- Inability to speak English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UNC Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Edwin Kim, Director of the UNC Food Allergy Initiative
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wesley Burks, MD
UNC Chapel Hill
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edwin Kim, MD
UNC Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2013
First Posted
March 19, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 1, 2018
Results First Posted
March 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share