Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy (PMIT)
PMIT
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if mucosal peanut immunotherapy will make subjects who have peanut allergy less allergic and induce changes in their immune system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Mar 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 3, 2017
CompletedMarch 27, 2018
March 1, 2017
7.3 years
January 4, 2008
January 25, 2017
February 27, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Amount of Peanut Protein Ingested Before An Allergic Reaction is Observed During the Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) After Completing Treatment With Peanut OIT.
After completing the peanut OIT protocol (defined as treatment with peanut OIT for at least 36-months AND a peanut-specific IgE \>2 and \<15 AND skin prick test is \<5 mm OR a maximum of 60 months of treatment), the reaction threshold for subjects is assessed by a DBPCFC. This involves eating small increasing doses of peanut protein in a blinded fashion up to a cumulative total of 5000 mg. An identical food challenge is also performed with oat flour as a placebo. The cumulative amount of peanut protein ingested prior to the dose that causes a reaction requiring treatment is reported as the reaction threshold.
36-60 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The Amount of Peanut Protein Ingested Before An Allergic Reaction is Observed During the Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) After Completing 12 Months of Blinded Peanut OIT or Placebo Treatment.
12 months
The Change From Baseline Through the End of Peanut OIT Treatment in Wheal Size Diameter Following Peanut Skin Prick Testing
Baseline to end of open label phase treatment (36-60 months)
The Change From Baseline Through the End of Peanut OIT Treatment in Peanut-specific IgE in the Blood
Baseline to end of open label phase treatment (36-60 months)
The Change From Baseline Through the End of Peanut OIT Treatment in Peanut-specific IgG4 in the Blood.
Baseline to end of open label phase treatment (36-60 months)
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOROat flour ingested daily as a placebo
Peanut OIT
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeanut flour ingested daily as oral mucosal immunotherapy
Interventions
Oat flour matched by weight and consistency that is ingested daily as a placebo
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject between 1 and 18 years of age
- EITHER history of significant clinical symptoms occurring within 60 minutes after ingesting peanuts greater than 6 months ago AND peanut specific IgE \>15 kU/L
- OR history of significant clinical symptoms occurring within 60 minutes after ingesting peanuts within the past 6 months AND peanut specific IgE \> 7 kU/L
- A family that will be able to be compliant with all study visits
- All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with a history of severe, anaphylaxis to peanut
- Medical history that would prevent a double blind placebo controlled oral food challenge (DBPCFC/OFC) to peanut
- Unable to cooperate with challenge procedures or unable to be reached by telephone for follow-up
- Diagnosed oat allergy
- Pregnancy or lactation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hilllead
- University of Arkansascollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of Arkansas Medical Center
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Edwin Kim, Director of the UNC Food Allergy Initiative
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arvil W Burks, MD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2008
First Posted
January 18, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2007
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 27, 2018
Results First Posted
May 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share