Study Stopped
Study was stopped due to slow enrollment
Clinical Outcomes of the Trinica(R) Anterior Lumbar Plate: Fixed Screws vs. Variable Screws
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Comparing Fixed-angle, Variable-angle, and Hybrid Screw Configuration for the Trinica(R) Anterior Lumbar Plate System
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate (ALP) System is a commercially available, supplemental fusion device for use in the lumbar or sacral spine (L1-S1) to treat instability. The system provides the surgeon with the ability to supplement an interbody device with anterior plate fixation. The device's bone-plate interface is enhanced through use of fixed-angled screws,variable-angle screws or a combination of both to accommodate various combinations of screw configurations, resulting in enhanced fixation tailored to individual patient needs. Clinical outcomes data, including a comparison of different screw configurations, is needed to support the use and of the Trinica ALP System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 26, 2014
CompletedApril 17, 2014
March 1, 2014
4.6 years
September 26, 2008
February 10, 2014
March 26, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, SF-12, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Surgeon Assessment, Patient Self Assessment, Radiological Assessment)
\- Fusion Assessment
Pre-operative, Operative; Follow-ups at 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
Study Arms (3)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALTrinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System with fixed screws only
Group 2
EXPERIMENTALTrinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System with variable screws only
Group 3
EXPERIMENTALTrinica Anterior Lumbar Plate with hybrid screw configuration (2 fixed-angle screws with 2 variable-angle screws).
Interventions
Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate System accommodates the use of either fixed- or variable-angle screws. This study is a comparison of clinical outcomes from anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients receiving the Trinica Anterior Lumbar Plate system with either all fixed-angle screws, variable-angle screws, or a hybrid configuration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spinal stenosis
- Spondylolisthesis Degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies)
- Fracture (including dislocation or subluxation)
- Spine tumor
- Scoliosis
- Lordotic deformities of the spine
You may not qualify if:
- An active systemic or local infection
- Previous fusion attempt at index level
- A local inflammation with or without fever or leukocytosis
- Pregnancy
- Obesity (BMI \>40 kg/m2)
- Drug or alcohol abuse
- Uncooperativeness or neurological or mental illness rendering the individual unwilling or unable to follow instructions
- Inability to restrict high activity level
- A suspected or documented metal allergy or intolerance
- A poor prognosis for good wound healing (e.g., decubitus ulcer, end-stage diabetes, severe protein deficiency and/or malnutrition)
- Any medical or surgical condition that would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, prevent secure component fixation, or seriously increase the risk of tolerating any surgical procedure,
- Any other "contraindications" as enumerated in the device's "Instructions for Use".
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zimmer Biometlead
Study Sites (3)
Alabama Spine Institute
Daphne, Alabama, 36526, United States
Ronderos Neurosurgery Center
Mobile, Alabama, 36608, United States
Loma Linda University Orthopedic Center
San Bernardino, California, 92408, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Laura Herdrich
- Organization
- Zimmer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2008
First Posted
September 30, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 17, 2014
Results First Posted
March 26, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03