Hypothermia for Cardiac Arrest in Paediatrics
1 other identifier
interventional
38
3 countries
4
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesized that, following cardiac arrest in pediatric patients, hypothermia therapy will improve the proportion of patients with a good functional outcome compared to a normothermic control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jan 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_2
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2010
CompletedJuly 14, 2021
July 1, 2021
4.7 years
September 17, 2008
July 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of children achieving a "good outcome", that is, a PCPC of 1-3 will be assessed using the Paediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores
Assessed at 12 months post cardiac arrest
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Cognitive and motor measures
Assessed at 12 months post-arrest
Mortality
Assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-arrest
Cerebral edema
12 months
Adverse effects of hypothermia therapy
12 months
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Patients randomized to the Normothermia arm (esophageal temp 36.5-37.5 ºC) were maintained at an esophageal temperature of 36.5-37.5ºC for 48 hours. Patients who were hypothermic (temperature \< 35 ºC) when randomized to the normothermia group were rewarmed slowly using the servo-controlled mattress. Patients who were hyperthermic following randomization to the normothermia group were actively cooled to normothermia using the servo-controlled mattress. Neuromuscular blockers were administered as needed intravenously in both groups of patients to prevent shivering.
Patients randomized to the Hypothermia arm (esophageal temp 33º to 34 °C) were cooled rapidly using the cooling protocol developed for the Hypothermia Paediatric Head Injury Trial. A temperature probe was placed in the esophagus and its position confirmed using a chest radiograph. Patients were placed on a servo-controlled cooling blanket and covered in crushed ice (in sealed plastic bags covered by pillow cases) and a second cooling blanket. Once the esophageal temperature reached 34.0ºC, the ice and second cooling blanket was removed and esophageal temperature was maintained at 33º to 34 °C for 48 hours using the servo-controlled cooling mattress. Patients treated with ECMO were cooled using the extracorporeal circuit cooling-device. Rewarming was done at a rate of 0.5 ºC every 2 hours until an esophageal temperature of 36.5 ºC was reached. Thereafter temperature was recorded but not controlled by surface cooling.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent by parent or legal guardian
- Age ≥ 38 weeks gestation up to and including 17 years
- Patient admitted with a diagnosis of a cardiac arrest requiring compressions ≥3 minutes
- Remain comatose i.e. have Glasgow Coma Score less than or equal to 10 assessed at the tertiary level pediatric hospital at least 1 hour post- cardiac arrest
- Invasive mechanical ventilation
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiac arrest lasting ≥45 minutes, irregardless of commencement of ECMO
- Refractory hemorrhagic shock
- Dysrhythmia leading to cardiac arrest, where cooling would be part of standard therapy
- Suspected diagnosis of brain death as defined as fixed and dilated pupils, Glasgow Coma Score of 3 and no evidence of brain function on neurological examination
- Patients who have had a prolonged cardiac arrest at the scene of a trauma
- Decision to withhold (DNR) or withdraw life sustaining therapies
- Acute Birth asphyxia
- Terminal illness, not expected to survive 12 months
- Cardiac arrest caused by septic shock
- Severe neurodevelopmental disability or persistent vegetative state prior to cardiac arrest
- Near drowning in ice water and temperature \<32ºC on admission to study site
- It has been more than 6 hours following cardiac arrest (estimated by first responder)
- Previous enrolment in the HypCAP Pilot Study
- Pregnant
- Parent/Guardian refuse consent
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sainte-Justine Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Starship Children's Hospital
Auckland, New Zealand
Great Ormond Street Hospital
London, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jamie Hutchison, MD
The Hospital for Sick Children
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2008
First Posted
September 18, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2010
Last Updated
July 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07