Study Stopped
See termination reason in detailed description.
Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Tigecycline Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin Subjects With Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study Of The Safety And Efficacy of 2 Doses Of Tigecycline Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin For The Treatment Of Subjects With Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
2 other identifiers
interventional
108
14 countries
40
Brief Summary
This study will compare the safety and efficacy of a tigecycline regimen versus an imipenem/cilastatin regimen for the treatment of subjects who are hospitalized with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). At least 70% of enrolled subjects will have ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Two dose levels of tigecycline will be assessed and compared to imipenem/cilastatin in parallel. Subjects will receive intravenous therapy from a minimum of 7 \& up to 14 consecutive days, the exact duration will be at the decision of the investigator based on the subject's condition. Additional protocol specified antibiotics may be given to ensure appropriate coverage. A final assessment at test-of-cure (TOC) visit will be done 10 to 21 days after the last day of therapy. The total duration of subject participation will be between 17 and 44 days, including a follow up period of 30 days after the last day of therapy for SAEs. Subjects will be followed for safety and efficacy. The safety assessment will include: physical examinations, vital signs, assessment of the clinical signs and symptoms of pneumonia, collection of adverse events, 12-lead ECG, collection of samples for hematology, serum chemistries, and coagulation parameters, \& a serum or urine pregnancy test before study entry for women of childbearing potential. The clinical and microbiological efficacy will both be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Dec 2008
40 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 10, 2012
CompletedJuly 10, 2012
June 1, 2012
2.5 years
June 26, 2008
June 5, 2012
June 5, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response in Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Clinical response: Cure=All initial signs/symptoms of pneumonia (SSx) improved; chest x-ray (CXR) improved/stable; no other antibiotics for pneumonia; no worsening or new SSx. Failure=Persistence or worsening SSx; no clinical improvement or initial improvement with clinically important worsening; other antimicrobials for pneumonia; CXR progression; death \> study day 2 due to pneumonia. Indeterminate=unable to determine outcome for non-study drug/infection reasons (e.g., lost to follow-up); death in 2 days after 1st dose for any reason, or \>2 days but before TOC visit for non-pneumonia reason.
Up to Day 24 to 35 (10 to 21 days after last day of therapy [LDOT])
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response in Clinical Modified Intent-to-treat (c-mITT) Population at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Up to Day 24 to 35 (10 to 21 days after LDOT)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response in Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) and Non-VAP Participants at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Up to Day 24 to 35 (10 to 21 days after LDOT)
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at the Pathogen Level Population at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Up to Day 24 to 35 (10 to 21 days after LDOT)
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at the Participant Level Population at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Up to Day 24 to 35 (10 to 21 days after LDOT)
Other Outcomes (14)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Nausea or Vomiting
Baseline up to Day 29 to Day 35 (15 to 21 days after LDOT)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Examinations
Baseline up to Day 24 to Day 35 (10 to 21 days after LDOT)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Baseline up to Day 14 or LDOT
- +11 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
A
EXPERIMENTALB
EXPERIMENTALC
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
An initial intravenous (IV) loading dose of 150 mg of tigecycline, followed by 75 mg of IV tigecycline approximately every 12 hours (q12h), for up to 14 consecutive days. Ceftazidime 2 g IV approximately every 8 hours, an aminoglycoside (tobramycin 7mg/kg daily or amikacin 20 mg/kg daily) and vancomycin placebo given at the start of therapy (unless it is known at baseline that the subject does not have Pseudomonas aeruginosa or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus \[MRSA\]).
Imipenem/cilastatin 1g intravenous (IV) will be administered approximately every 8 hours, for up to 14 consecutive days. In addition vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV approximately every 12 hours (q12h), an aminoglycoside (tobramycin 7mg/kg daily or amikacin 20 mg/kg daily) and ceftazidime placebo will be given at the start of therapy (unless it is known at baseline that the subject does not have Pseudomonas aeruginosa or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus \[MRSA\]).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects, greater than or equal to 18 years of age, known or suspected to have acute hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).
- Acute HAP is defined as pneumonia with onset of symptoms:
- Greater than or equal to 48 hours after admission to an acute care hospital or chronic care facility such as a skilled nursing home facility or rehabilitation unit. Or
- Less than or equal to 7 days after the subject was discharged from the hospital. The initial hospitalization must have been greater than or equal to 3 days duration.
- VAP is defined as: onset of symptoms of pneumonia greater than or equal to 48 hours after endotracheal intubation.
- Presence of a new or evolving infiltrate on a chest x-ray film, presence of fever or leukocytosis, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation or presence of 2 of the following clinical signs and symptoms: cough, dyspnea or tachypnea, pleuritic chest pain, rales and/or evidence of pulmonary consolidation, hypoxemia, or purulent sputum production.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with other significant underlying conditions that would make it difficult to evaluate the subjects or make it unlikely to complete the therapy or that would increase their risk by participating in the study, infection with organisms known to be resistant, contraindication, or hypersensitivity to any of the test articles.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (40)
Pfizer Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Pfizer Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131, United States
Pfizer Investigational Site
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506, United States
Pfizer Investigational Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900, Argentina
Pfizer Investigational Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires, B1900AVG, Argentina
Pfizer Investigational Site
Godoy Cruz, Mendoza Province, Argentina
Pfizer Investigational Site
Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Pfizer Investigational Site
Nambour, Queensland, 4560, Australia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Victoria, Victoria, 3128, Australia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30150-221, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000, Brazil
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 5H6, Canada
Pfizer Investigational Site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 3R9, Canada
Pfizer Investigational Site
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Pfizer Investigational Site
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bogotá, Colombia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Argenteuil, 95100, France
Pfizer Investigational Site
Debrecen, 4043, Hungary
Pfizer Investigational Site
Nyíregyháza, 4400, Hungary
Pfizer Investigational Site
Székesfehérvár, 8000, Hungary
Pfizer Investigational Site
Vác, 2600, Hungary
Pfizer Investigational Site
Daugavpils, LV-5417, Latvia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Riga, 1001, Latvia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Riga, LV-1001, Latvia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Moscow, 119620, Russia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Moscow, 121359, Russia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Novosibirsk, 630051, Russia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194354, Russia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 196247, Russia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Vsevolozhsk, 188640, Russia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seoul, Korea, 135 710, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seoul, Korea, 136-705, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seoul, Korea, 138-736, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seoul, Korea, 152-703, South Korea
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tainan, Taiwan, 407, Taiwan
Pfizer Investigational Site
Taipei, Taiwan, 100, Taiwan
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tainan, Taiwan
Pfizer Investigational Site
Taipei TOC, 100, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Ramirez J, Dartois N, Gandjini H, Yan JL, Korth-Bradley J, McGovern PC. Randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of two high-dosage tigecycline regimens versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Apr;57(4):1756-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01232-12. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
PMID: 23357775DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Formal statistical conclusions could not be made due to premature termination of study, because of enrollment difficulties, and small number of enrolled participants.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2008
First Posted
June 30, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 10, 2012
Results First Posted
July 10, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06