NCT00684645

Brief Summary

Primary objective: to increase knowledge about safety, tolerability, quality of life and efficacy under conditions of routine use of SUTENT®. Secondary objectives: treatment response, hypothyroidism prevalence.The efficacy will be assessed using the Objective Response Rate, Time to Progression based on the RECIST criteria and the ECOG performance data.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
186

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2008

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

20 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 26, 2008

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2008

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2011

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 21, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

August 21, 2012

Status Verified

July 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

May 22, 2008

Results QC Date

April 18, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Safety and tolerability of SUTENT® in patients with metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of cytokines in real-life setting.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR). CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

    12 months

  • Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    The period from study entry until disease progression, death, or date of last contact.

    Baseline to measured progressive disease (up to 12 months)

  • Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is the duration from enrollment to death.

    Baseline to date of death (up to 12 months)

  • Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Week 6

    Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

    Week 6

  • Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Month 3

    Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

    Month 3

  • Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Month 6

    Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

    Month 6

  • Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Month 9

    Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

    Month 9

  • Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Month 12

    Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

    Month 12

  • Correlation Between Sunitinib-induced Hypertension and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)

    Sunitinib-induced hypertension was determined using blood pressure recorded at each postbaseline visit. Once participants were identified as having sunitinib-induced hypertension, they retained that status at subsequent visits. PFS is the time from start of study treatment to first documentation of tumor response to treatment. Hazard ratio represents the relationship between sunitinib-induced hypertension and PFS (presence/absence of hypertension).

    Baseline to date of first documentation of response to treatment (up to 12 months)

  • Correlation Between Sunitinib-induced Hypertension and Tumor Response to Treatment (OS)

    Sunitinib-induced hypertension was determined using blood pressure recorded at each postbaseline visit. Once participants were identified as having sunitinib-induced hypertension, they retained that status at subsequent visits. OS is the time from start of study treatment to death. Hazard ratio represents the relationship between sunitinib-induced hypertension and OS.

    Baseline to date of death (up to 12 months)

  • Percentage of Participants With Hypothyroidism

    TSH and FT4 levels were measured and hypothyroidism was defined as a TSH level \>5.0 mIU/L at that time point.

    Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12

  • Percentage of Participants With Hypertension

    Hypertension was defined as follows. Grade 1: Asymptomatic, transient (less than \[\<\]24 hours) increase by \>20mm Hg (diastolic) or to \>150/100 mm Hg if previously within normal limits (WNL). Grade 2: Recurrent or persistent (24 hours or more) or symptomatic increase by \>20 mm Hg (diastolic) or to \>150/100 mm Hg if previously WNL. Grade 3: Requiring \>1 drug or more intensive therapy than previously. Grade 4: Life-threatening. Grade 5: Death.

    Baseline, Week 6, Months 3, 6, 9, 12

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Summary of Adverse Events for Participants Who Required Dose Modification

    Baseline up to 12 months

  • Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Hypertension, by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade

    Baseline up to 12 months

  • Percentage of Participants Responding to Treatment

    12 months

Study Arms (1)

Patients treated with SUTENT®

Patients with metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of cytokines therapy.

Drug: SUTENT

Interventions

SUTENTDRUG

SUTENT® hard gelatin capsules containing 12.5 mg, 25 mg or 50 mg equivalent of sunitinib malate; daily dosage of 50 mg for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. Sutent is administered until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity.

Patients treated with SUTENT®

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with metastatic and/or advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of cytokines therapy.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

You may not qualify if:

  • No previous cytokines therapy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (20)

Pfizer Investigational Site

Brno, 625 00, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Brno, 656 53, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Brno, 656 91, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Chomutov, 430 12, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

České Budějovice, 370 87, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Fryštát, 735 06, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Hradec Králové, 500 05, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Jihlava, 586 33, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Liberec, 460 63, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Nová Ves pod Pleší, 26204, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Nový Jičín, 741 01, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Ostrava, 703 84, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Ostrava, 708 52, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Pardubice, 532 03, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Pilsen, 301 00, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Prague, 100 34, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Prague, 128 08, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Prague, 140 59, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Prague, 150 00, Czechia

Location

Pfizer Investigational Site

Zlín, 639 00, Czechia

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Interventions

Sunitinib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsKidney NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PyrrolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization
Pfizer, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

    Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2008

First Posted

May 26, 2008

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion

April 1, 2011

Study Completion

April 1, 2011

Last Updated

August 21, 2012

Results First Posted

August 21, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-07

Locations