Laboratory Test in Predicting Response to Erlotinib in Patients With Relapsed Metastatic or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Did Not Respond to Previous Treatment
A Phase II Single-Arm Trial Assessing the Use of an Ex Vivo Sensitivity Assay to Predict Response of Relapsed Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients to Erlotinib
3 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Studying samples of tumor tissue from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about changes that may occur in DNA and identify biomarkers related to cancer. It may also help doctors learn how well patients will respond to treatment. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well a laboratory test predicts response to erlotinib in patients with metastatic or unresectable non-small cell lung cancer that did not respond to previous treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2008
CompletedAugust 9, 2010
August 1, 2010
10 months
May 6, 2008
August 5, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Quantitative assessment of phospho-ERK
Extent of inhibition of ERK phosphorylation by erlotinib hydrochloride
Clinical response
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Extent of inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and AKT phosphorylation by erlotinib hydrochloride
Toxicity
Frequency and proportion of patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease
Comparison of ex vivo and in vivo effects of erlotinib hydrochloride
Proportion of patients with EGFR gene amplification and gene mutation with an ex vivo response and clinical response
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles M. Rudin, MD, PhD
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2008
First Posted
May 7, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
July 1, 2007
Last Updated
August 9, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-08