Ph II Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine With Erlotinib/Elderly Patients W/ IIIB/IV NSCLC
Randomized Phase II Study of First-Line Treatment With Gemcitabine vs. Erlotinib vs. Gemcitabine and Erlotinib in Elderly Patients With Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
3 other identifiers
interventional
147
1 country
11
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine and erlotinib are more effective when given alone or together in treating non-small cell lung cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying gemcitabine and erlotinib to compare how well they work when given alone or together as first-line therapy in treating older patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 lung-cancer
Started Mar 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_2 lung-cancer
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 24, 2017
CompletedApril 24, 2017
March 1, 2017
8.5 years
January 24, 2006
August 25, 2016
March 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression-free Survival
We would consider the combination of gemcitabine plus erlotinib or single agent erlotinib to be worthy of further study if there was an increased progressed-free survival. We would use an increase to 45% progression-free survival at 6 months as significant. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Six months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Response Rate
Six months
Overall Survival
Up to 3 years
Toxicity
After each cycle/3 weeks, up to 3 years
Quality of Life (QOL)- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) Trial Outcome Index-L (TOI-L)
After each cycle/3 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Arm A
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride 1200mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8. Patients with progressive disease may cross over to arm B.
Arm B
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride 150mg p.o. daily on days 1-21.
Arm C
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride 1000mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 and erlotinib hydrochloride 100mg p.o. daily
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- prior treatment in the neo-adjuvant setting as well. Treated brain metastases are eligible provided the patient is asymptomatic and meets the above criteria, including PS. Measurable disease by RECIST criteria Ability to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
Highlands Oncology Group - Fayetteville
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703, United States
Summit Cancer Care
Savannah, Georgia, 31405, United States
Evanston Hospital
Evanston, Illinois, 60201-1781, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center Cancer Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295, United States
Blumenthal Cancer Center at Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28232-2861, United States
Batte Cancer Center at Northeast Medical Center
Concord, North Carolina, 28025, United States
Cape Fear Valley Medical Center Cancer Center
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28302-2000, United States
Rex Cancer Center at Rex Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
Kingsport Hematology-Oncology Associates
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660, United States
University of Tennessee Cancer Institute - Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robin V. Johnson
- Organization
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas E Stinchcombe, MD
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2006
First Posted
January 27, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 24, 2017
Results First Posted
April 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share any individual participant data.