Trial of Lymphoseek in Intraoperative Localization of Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer and Melanoma
A Phase 3, Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Comparison Study of Lymphoseek® and Vital Blue Dye as Lymphoid Tissue Targeting Agents in Patients With Known Melanoma or Breast Cancer Who Are Undergoing Lymph Node Mapping
1 other identifier
interventional
186
2 countries
15
Brief Summary
Data from this pivotal clinical trial will be used to support a marketing application (i.e., NDA) for Navidea's Lymphoseek for use in intraoperative localization of lymph tissue (nodes) in the lymphatic pathway draining the primary site of a tumor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Apr 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 breast-cancer
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 3, 2013
CompletedJune 17, 2013
June 1, 2013
1.2 years
April 30, 2008
April 13, 2013
June 6, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Concordance of Blue Dye and Lymphoseek
The proportion of lymph nodes detected intraoperatively by blue dye that were also detected by Lymphoseek.
Surgery after injections of Lymphoseek and blue dye
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reverse Concordance of Blue Dye and Lymphoseek
Surgery after injections of Lymphoseek and blue dye
Study Arms (1)
Lymphoseek, Lymphatic mapping, Injection
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Breast Cancer: Intradermal admin of Lymphoseek: Inject 0.2-0.4 mL in multiple divided injections or a single injection overlying the intact primary tumor or excision biopsy site OR periareolar administration of Lymphoseek: Inject 0.2-.04 mL in multiple divided doses at the margin of the areola OR subareolar administration of Lymphoseek: Inject 0.2-0.4 in multiple divided injections or a single injection in subareolar area as a subcutaneous injection OR peritumor administration of Lymphoseek: Inject 2.0-4.0 mL in multiple divided injections, intraparenchemally surrounding the tumor or biopsy cavity. For melanoma pts intradermal administration of Lymphoseek: Inject 0.2-0.4 mL in multiple divided injections or a single injection overlying the intact primary tumor or excision biopsy site.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient has provided written informed consent with HIPAA authorization before participating in the study, as has his/her responsible caregiver, if applicable.
- The patient is a candidate for surgical intervention, with lymph node mapping being a part of the surgical plan.
- The patient is at least 18 years of age at the time of consent.
- The patient has an ECOG performance status of Grade 0 - 2 \[8\].
- The patient has a clinical negative node status at the time of study entry.
- If of child bearing potential, the patient has a negative pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to administration of Lymphoseek, has been surgically sterilized, or has been postmenopausal for at least 1 year.
- The patient is currently not participating in another investigational drug study.
- Melanoma Patients
- The patient has a diagnosis of primary melanoma.
- Breast Cancer Patients
- The patient has a diagnosis of primary breast cancer.
- Patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or non-invasive carcinoma if lymph node biopsy is part of the surgical plan.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is pregnant or lactating;
- The patient has clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic cancer including palpably abnormal or enlarged lymph nodes (i.e., all patients should be any T,N0,M0);
- The patient has a known hypersensitivity to Lymphazurin or Patent Bleu V.
- Melanoma Patients
- The patient has a tumor with a Breslow depth less than 0.75mm.;
- Patients that have had preoperative chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiation therapy;
- Patients diagnosed with a prior invasive melanoma that would occur on the same body region or potentially draining to the same nodal basin or patients with truncal or extremity primary melanoma who has had a prior breast cancer potentially draining to the same axillary nodal basin;
- Patients who have undergone node basin surgery of any type or radiation to the nodal basin(s) potentially draining the primary melanoma;
- Patients who have undergone a wide excision for their primary melanoma (\>1 cm in dimension) or complex reconstruction (rotation, free flap or skin graft of any type).
- Breast Cancer Patients
- The patient has bilateral primary breast cancers or multiple tumors within their breast;
- Patients that have had prior surgical procedures such as breast implants, reduction mammoplasty or axillary surgery;
- Patients scheduled for bilateral mastectomy for any reason;
- Patients that have had preoperative radiation therapy to the affected breast or axilla
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
Barbara Michna, M.D
Alexander City, Alabama, 35010, United States
Helen Krontiras, M.D.
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Anne Wallace, M.D.
La Jolla, California, 92093, United States
Ken Deck, M.D.
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Steve Martinez, M.D.
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Mark Faries, M.D.
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
Eli Avisar, M.D.
Miami, Florida, 33101, United States
Charles Cox, M.D.
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Vernon Sondak, M.D.
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Julian Kim, M.D.
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Bruce Averbook, M.D
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
Stephen Povoski, M.D.
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Thomas Frazier, M.D.
Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010, United States
Ned Carp, M.D.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19096, United States
Schlomo Schneebaum, M.D.
Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
Related Publications (50)
Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Mozzillo N, Elashoff R, Essner R, Nieweg OE, Roses DF, Hoekstra HJ, Karakousis CP, Reintgen DS, Coventry BJ, Glass EC, Wang HJ; MSLT Group. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 28;355(13):1307-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060992.
PMID: 17005948BACKGROUNDGiuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994 Sep;220(3):391-8; discussion 398-401. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00015.
PMID: 8092905BACKGROUNDMorton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, Elashoff R, Essner R, Glass EC, Mozzillo N, Nieweg OE, Roses DF, Hoekstra HJ, Karakousis CP, Reintgen DS, Coventry BJ, Wang HJ; Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2005 Sep;242(3):302-11; discussion 311-3. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000181092.50141.fa.
PMID: 16135917BACKGROUNDRossi CR, De Salvo GL, Trifiro G, Mocellin S, Landi G, Macripo G, Carcoforo P, Ricotti G, Giudice G, Picciotto F, Donner D, Di Filippo F, Montesco MC, Casara D, Schiavon M, Foletto M, Baldini F, Testori A. The impact of lymphoscintigraphy technique on the outcome of sentinel node biopsy in 1,313 patients with cutaneous melanoma: an Italian Multicentric Study (SOLISM-IMI). J Nucl Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):234-41.
PMID: 16455628BACKGROUNDAlbertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, Yeatman T, Balducci L, Ku N, Shivers S, Berman C, Wells K, Rapaport D, Shons A, Horton J, Greenberg H, Nicosia S, Clark R, Cantor A, Reintgen DS. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA. 1996 Dec 11;276(22):1818-22.
PMID: 8946902BACKGROUNDVeronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, Costa A, de Cicco C, Geraghty JG, Luini A, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997 Jun 28;349(9069):1864-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01004-0.
PMID: 9217757BACKGROUNDGiuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2345-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2345.
PMID: 9196149BACKGROUNDKrag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P. The sentinel node in breast cancer--a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 1;339(14):941-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810013391401.
PMID: 9753708BACKGROUNDKrag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol. 1993 Dec;2(6):335-9; discussion 340. doi: 10.1016/0960-7404(93)90064-6.
PMID: 8130940BACKGROUNDKrag DN. Gamma-probe-guided resection of axillary sentinel nodes. Presented at the 48th annual symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, March 23-25, 1995, Boston MA.
BACKGROUNDGuiliano AE. Axillary node mapping for breast cancer. Presented at the 48th annual symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, March 23-25, 1995, Boston MA.
BACKGROUNDWallace AM, Hoh CK, Vera DR, Darrah DD, Schulteis G. Lymphoseek: a molecular radiopharmaceutical for sentinel node detection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Jun;10(5):531-8. doi: 10.1245/aso.2003.07.012.
PMID: 12794019BACKGROUNDEllner SJ, Hoh CK, Vera DR, Darrah DD, Schulteis G, Wallace AM. Dose-dependent biodistribution of [(99m)Tc]DTPA-mannosyl-dextran for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping. Nucl Med Biol. 2003 Nov;30(8):805-10. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2003.10.001.
PMID: 14698783BACKGROUNDPosther KE, McCall LM, Blumencranz PW, Burak WE Jr, Beitsch PD, Hansen NM, Morrow M, Wilke LG, Herndon JE 2nd, Hunt KK, Giuliano AE. Sentinel node skills verification and surgeon performance: data from a multicenter clinical trial for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2005 Oct;242(4):593-9; discussion 599-602. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000184210.68646.77.
PMID: 16192820BACKGROUNDBarnwell JM, Arredondo MA, Kollmorgen D, Gibbs JF, Lamonica D, Carson W, Zhang P, Winston J, Edge SB. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998 Mar;5(2):126-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02303845.
PMID: 9527265BACKGROUNDO'Hea BJ, Hill AD, El-Shirbiny AM, Yeh SD, Rosen PP, Coit DG, Borgen PI, Cody HS 3rd. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Apr;186(4):423-7. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00060-x.
PMID: 9544956BACKGROUNDKlimberg VS, Rubio IT, Henry R, Cowan C, Colvert M, Korourian S. Subareolar versus peritumoral injection for location of the sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg. 1999 Jun;229(6):860-4; discussion 864-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199906000-00013.
PMID: 10363900BACKGROUNDBorgstein PJ, Meijer S, Pijpers RJ, van Diest PJ. Functional lymphatic anatomy for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: echoes from the past and the periareolar blue method. Ann Surg. 2000 Jul;232(1):81-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200007000-00012.
PMID: 10862199BACKGROUNDSmith LF, Cross MJ, Klimberg VS. Subareolar injection is a better technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg. 2000 Dec;180(6):434-7; discussion 437-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00521-3.
PMID: 11182393BACKGROUNDTsugawa K, Noguchi M, Miwa K, Bando E, Yokoyama K, Nakajima K, Michigishi T, Tonami N, Minato H, Nonomura A. Dye- and gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients: using patent blue dye and technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin. Breast Cancer. 2000 Jan;7(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02967195.
PMID: 11029778BACKGROUNDDonahue EJ. Sentinel node imaging and biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg. 2001 Oct;182(4):426-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00731-0.
PMID: 11720685BACKGROUNDMartin RC, Derossis AM, Fey J, Yeung H, Yeh SD, Akhurst T, Heerdt AS, Petrek J, VanZee KJ, Montgomery LL, Borgen PI, Cody HS 3rd. Intradermal isotope injection is superior to intramammary in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. Surgery. 2001 Sep;130(3):432-8. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.116412.
PMID: 11562666BACKGROUNDBauer TW, Spitz FR, Callans LS, Alavi A, Mick R, Weinstein SP, Bedrosian I, Fraker DL, Bauer TL, Czerniecki BJ. Subareolar and peritumoral injection identify similar sentinel nodes for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Mar;9(2):169-76. doi: 10.1007/BF02557370.
PMID: 11888875BACKGROUNDKern KA. Concordance and validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye and technetium 99m sulfur colloid. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Oct;195(4):467-75. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01312-1.
PMID: 12375751BACKGROUNDTuttle TM, Colbert M, Christensen R, Ose KJ, Jones T, Wetherille R, Friedman J, Swenson K, McMasters KM. Subareolar injection of 99mTc facilitates sentinel lymph node identification. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):77-81. doi: 10.1245/aso.2002.9.1.77.
PMID: 11829434BACKGROUNDZavagno G, Meggiolaro F, Rossi CR, Casara D, Pescarini L, Marchet A, Denetto V, Baratella P, Lise M. Subareolar injection for sentinel lymph node location in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002 Nov;28(7):701-4. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1340.
PMID: 12431465BACKGROUNDPelosi E, Bello M, Giors M, Ala A, Giani R, Bussone R, Bisi G. Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with early-stage breast cancer: comparison of periareolar and subdermal/peritumoral injection techniques. J Nucl Med. 2004 Feb;45(2):220-5.
PMID: 14960639BACKGROUNDWada N, Imoto S, Yamauchi C, Hasebe T, Ochiai A, Ebihara S. Correlation between concordance of tracers, order of harvest, and presence of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun;12(6):497-503. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Apr 19.
PMID: 15864480BACKGROUNDRodier JF, Velten M, Wilt M, Martel P, Ferron G, Vaini-Elies V, Mignotte H, Bremond A, Classe JM, Dravet F, Routiot T, de Lara CT, Avril A, Lorimier G, Fondrinier E, Houvenaeghel G, Avigdor S. Prospective multicentric randomized study comparing periareolar and peritumoral injection of radiotracer and blue dye for the detection of sentinel lymph node in breast sparing procedures: FRANSENODE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3664-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4228. Epub 2007 May 7.
PMID: 17485709BACKGROUNDHodgson N, Zabel P, Mattar AG, Engel CJ, Girvan D, Holliday R. A new radiocolloid for sentinel node detection in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001 Mar;8(2):133-7. doi: 10.1007/s10434-001-0133-2.
PMID: 11258777BACKGROUNDSimon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Mar;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9.
PMID: 2702835BACKGROUNDCox CE, Pendas S, Cox JM, Joseph E, Shons AR, Yeatman T, Ku NN, Lyman GH, Berman C, Haddad F, Reintgen DS. Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1998 May;227(5):645-51; discussion 651-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00005.
PMID: 9605656BACKGROUNDMcMasters KM, Wong SL, Chao C, Woo C, Tuttle TM, Noyes RD, Carlson DJ, Laidley AL, McGlothin TQ, Ley PB, Brown CM, Glaser RL, Pennington RE, Turk PS, Simpson D, Edwards MJ; University of Louisville Breast Cancer Study Group. Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniques. Ann Surg. 2001 Sep;234(3):292-9; discussion 299-300. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00003.
PMID: 11524582BACKGROUNDMiltenburg DM, Miller C, Karamlou TB, Brunicardi FC. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. J Surg Res. 1999 Jun 15;84(2):138-42. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1999.5629.
PMID: 10357910BACKGROUNDKim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis. Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;106(1):4-16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21568.
PMID: 16329134BACKGROUNDBergkvist L, Frisell J, Liljegren G, Celebioglu F, Damm S, Thorn M. Multicentre study of detection and false-negative rates in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2001 Dec;88(12):1644-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01948.x.
PMID: 11736980BACKGROUNDKrag DN, Meijer SJ, Weaver DL, Loggie BW, Harlow SP, Tanabe KK, Laughlin EH, Alex JC. Minimal-access surgery for staging of malignant melanoma. Arch Surg. 1995 Jun;130(6):654-8; discussion 659-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430060092018.
PMID: 7539252BACKGROUNDAlbertini JJ, Cruse CW, Rapaport D, Wells K, Ross M, DeConti R, Berman CG, Jared K, Messina J, Lyman G, Glass F, Fenske N, Reintgen DS. Intraoperative radio-lympho-scintigraphy improves sentinel lymph node identification for patients with melanoma. Ann Surg. 1996 Feb;223(2):217-24. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199602000-00016.
PMID: 8597518BACKGROUNDHabib FA, Lodish ME, Mittal VK, Young SC. Sentinel lymph node dissection for primary cutaneous melanoma: a community hospital's initial experience. Am Surg. 2000 Mar;66(3):291-5.
PMID: 10759202BACKGROUNDEstourgie SH, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, Hoefnagel CA, Kroon BB. Review and evaluation of sentinel node procedures in 250 melanoma patients with a median follow-up of 6 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Jul;10(6):681-8. doi: 10.1245/aso.2003.01.023.
PMID: 12839854BACKGROUNDVuylsteke RJ, van Leeuwen PA, Statius Muller MG, Gietema HA, Kragt DR, Meijer S. Clinical outcome of stage I/II melanoma patients after selective sentinel lymph node dissection: long-term follow-up results. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 15;21(6):1057-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.170.
PMID: 12637471BACKGROUNDYee VS, Thompson JF, McKinnon JG, Scolyer RA, Li LX, McCarthy WH, O'Brien CJ, Quinn MJ, Saw RP, Shannon KF, Stretch JR, Uren RF. Outcome in 846 cutaneous melanoma patients from a single center after a negative sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun;12(6):429-39. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.074. Epub 2005 Apr 28.
PMID: 15886905BACKGROUNDMorton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, Economou JS, Cagle LA, Storm FK, Foshag LJ, Cochran AJ. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992 Apr;127(4):392-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420040034005.
PMID: 1558490BACKGROUNDReintgen D, Cruse CW, Wells K, Berman C, Fenske N, Glass F, Schroer K, Heller R, Ross M, Lyman G, et al. The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases. Ann Surg. 1994 Dec;220(6):759-67. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199412000-00009.
PMID: 7986143BACKGROUNDThompson JF, McCarthy WH, Bosch CM, O'Brien CJ, Quinn MJ, Paramaesvaran S, Crotty K, McCarthy SW, Uren RF, Howman-Giles R. Sentinel lymph node status as an indicator of the presence of metastatic melanoma in regional lymph nodes. Melanoma Res. 1995 Aug;5(4):255-60. doi: 10.1097/00008390-199508000-00008.
PMID: 7496161BACKGROUNDMorton DL, Wen DR, Foshag LJ, Essner R, Cochran A. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and selective cervical lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanomas of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Sep;11(9):1751-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.9.1751.
PMID: 8355042BACKGROUNDKarakousis CP, Velez AF, Spellman JE Jr, Scarozza J. The technique of sentinel node biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996 Jun;22(3):271-5. doi: 10.1016/s0748-7983(96)80017-5.
PMID: 8654611BACKGROUNDLingam MK, Mackie RM, McKay AJ. Intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph node in patients with malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer. 1997;75(10):1505-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.257.
PMID: 9166945BACKGROUNDSondak VK, King DW, Zager JS, Schneebaum S, Kim J, Leong SP, Faries MB, Averbook BJ, Martinez SR, Puleo CA, Messina JL, Christman L, Wallace AM. Combined analysis of phase III trials evaluating [(9)(9)mTc]tilmanocept and vital blue dye for identification of sentinel lymph nodes in clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(2):680-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2612-z. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
PMID: 23054107RESULTWallace AM, Han LK, Povoski SP, Deck K, Schneebaum S, Hall NC, Hoh CK, Limmer KK, Krontiras H, Frazier TG, Cox C, Avisar E, Faries M, King DW, Christman L, Vera DR. Comparative evaluation of [(99m)tc]tilmanocept for sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients: results of two phase 3 trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2590-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2887-8. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
PMID: 23504141RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Frederick Cope
- Organization
- Navidea Biopharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Richard Orahood, M.D.
Navidea Biopharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2008
First Posted
May 5, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 17, 2013
Results First Posted
June 3, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-06