Comparison of Paravertebral Block With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
A Comparison of Ultrasound-assisted Paravertebral Block and General Anesthesia for Outpatient Breast Cancer Surgery, a Prospective Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this project is to determine if there is a difference between paravertebral block and general anesthesia in terms of time to discharge from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit and pain level in patients undergoing outpatient breast cancer surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Apr 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2010
CompletedAugust 5, 2011
August 1, 2011
1.9 years
March 19, 2008
August 4, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time in minutes until the patient is declared ready for discharge from the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Until PACU discharge
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after PACU admission. A VAS score will also be assessed on the first postoperative day.
Until PACU discharge and for 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The need for postoperative opioids in the PACU and during the first postoperative day will be assessed.
24 hours
Episodes of nausea or vomiting in the PACU and during the first postoperative day will be assessed.
24 hours
Total time spent in the operating room
Perioperative
Overall patient satisfaction
After hospital discharge
Study Arms (2)
Paravertebral Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receiving Paravertebral Block.
General Anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receiving General Anesthesia.
Interventions
Sedation will be provided with midazolam and fentanyl. The transverse processes of T1-T6 will be located using ultrasound guidance. The area will be prepped with betadine. At each level, a 21 Gauge, 4-inch Stimuplex needle will be inserted in order to make contact with the transverse process. Once the transverse process has been located, the needle will be "walked off" the process and inserted 1 cm deep to its inferior border. After negative aspiration, 3 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 and bicarbonate and 3 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 will be injected. Sedation will be provided with 50-100 mcg/kg/min of propofol during the surgical procedure. Approximately 20 minutes before the end of the procedure, 4 mg of zofran will be administered.
Patients in the general anesthesia group will receive midazolam preoperatively for anxiolysis. Anesthesia will be induced with propofol and fentanyl. An LMA will be inserted and anesthesia maintained with sevoflurane in air and oxygen. 4 mg of zofran will be administered approximately 20 minutes before the end of the surgical procedure. The LMA will be removed and the patient will be transported to the PACU at the conclusion of the surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women 18 years of age or older with suspected breast carcinoma scheduled for unilateral lumpectomy or mass excision with sentinel node biopsy and possible axillary dissection.
You may not qualify if:
- A diagnosis of chronic pain, regular use of opioid medications, infection at the injection site, allergy to amide local anesthetics, bleeding disorder, contraindication to LMA, and patient refusal.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Related Publications (22)
Pusch F, Freitag H, Weinstabl C, Obwegeser R, Huber E, Wildling E. Single-injection paravertebral block compared to general anaesthesia in breast surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999 Aug;43(7):770-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430714.x.
PMID: 10456819BACKGROUNDMcCartney CJ, Brull R, Chan VW, Katz J, Abbas S, Graham B, Nova H, Rawson R, Anastakis DJ, von Schroeder H. Early but no long-term benefit of regional compared with general anesthesia for ambulatory hand surgery. Anesthesiology. 2004 Aug;101(2):461-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00028.
PMID: 15277930BACKGROUNDCoveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R, Iglehart JD, Leight GS, Steele SM, Lyerly HK. Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer: experience in 156 cases. Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):496-501. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00008.
PMID: 9563536BACKGROUNDKlein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00026.
PMID: 10825328BACKGROUNDKarmakar MK, Booker PD, Franks R. Bilateral continuous paravertebral block used for postoperative analgesia in an infant having bilateral thoracotomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 1997;7(6):469-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1997.d01-118.x.
PMID: 9365974BACKGROUNDRichardson J, Vowden P, Sabanathan S. Bilateral paravertebral analgesia for major abdominal vascular surgery: a preliminary report. Anaesthesia. 1995 Nov;50(11):995-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05939.x.
PMID: 8678263BACKGROUNDWassef MR, Randazzo T, Ward W. The paravertebral nerve root block for inguinal herniorrhaphy--a comparison with the field block approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;23(5):451-6. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90026-8.
PMID: 9773696BACKGROUNDEason MJ, Wyatt R. Paravertebral thoracic block-a reappraisal. Anaesthesia. 1979 Jul-Aug;34(7):638-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1979.tb06363.x.
PMID: 517716BACKGROUNDGilbert J, Hultman J. Thoracic paravertebral block: a method of pain control. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989 Feb;33(2):142-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1989.tb02877.x.
PMID: 2922982BACKGROUNDCheema SP, Ilsley D, Richardson J, Sabanathan S. A thermographic study of paravertebral analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1995 Feb;50(2):118-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb15092.x.
PMID: 7710020BACKGROUNDTerheggen MA, Wille F, Borel Rinkes IH, Ionescu TI, Knape JT. Paravertebral blockade for minor breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002 Feb;94(2):355-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200202000-00023.
PMID: 11812698BACKGROUNDEvans PJ, Lloyd JW, Wood GJ. Accidental intrathecal injection of bupivacaine and dextran. Anaesthesia. 1981 Jul;36(7):685-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb08781.x.
PMID: 6168207BACKGROUNDLonnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, Conacher ID. Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995 Sep;50(9):813-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06148.x.
PMID: 7573876BACKGROUNDChan VWS, Perlas A, Rawson R, Odukoya O. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1514-1517. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000062519.61520.14.
PMID: 14570677BACKGROUNDMarhofer P, Sitzwohl C, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance for infraclavicular brachial plexus anaesthesia in children. Anaesthesia. 2004 Jul;59(7):642-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03669.x.
PMID: 15200537BACKGROUNDSandhu NS, Manne JS, Medabalmi PK, Capan LM. Sonographically guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults: a retrospective analysis of 1146 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2006 Dec;25(12):1555-61. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.12.1555.
PMID: 17121950BACKGROUNDPusch F, Wildling E, Klimscha W, Weinstabl C. Sonographic measurement of needle insertion depth in paravertebral blocks in women. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Dec;85(6):841-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.6.841.
PMID: 11732516BACKGROUNDGreengrass R, O'Brien F, Lyerly K, Hardman D, Gleason D, D'Ercole F, Steele S. Paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1996 Aug;43(8):858-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03013039.
PMID: 8840066BACKGROUNDWeltz CR, Greengrass RA, Lyerly HK. Ambulatory surgical management of breast carcinoma using paravertebral block. Ann Surg. 1995 Jul;222(1):19-26. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199507000-00004.
PMID: 7618963BACKGROUNDNajarian MM, Johnson JM, Landercasper J, Havlik P, Lambert PJ, McCarthy D. Paravertebral block: an alternative to general anesthesia in breast cancer surgery. Am Surg. 2003 Mar;69(3):213-8; discussion 218.
PMID: 12678477BACKGROUNDKarmakar MK. Thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesiology. 2001 Sep;95(3):771-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200109000-00033. No abstract available.
PMID: 11575553BACKGROUNDChhabra A, Roy Chowdhury A, Prabhakar H, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Srivastava A, Kalaivani M. Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 25;2(2):CD012968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012968.pub2.
PMID: 33629404DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tiffany Tedore, M.D.
New York Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2008
First Posted
March 27, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 5, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-08