Determine Tumor Response Using Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)- Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Before and After Cetuximab in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
SCCHN
Determination of Tumor SUV by FDG-PET/CT Before and After Cetuximab in Patients With Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to collect data and evaluate how the tumor is broken down in response to standard of care cetuximab treatment by evaluating the FDG-PET/CT scans, toxicity, see how well the FDG-PET/CT scans predict response to treatment and survival.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jun 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 10, 2015
CompletedMarch 14, 2017
February 1, 2017
3.5 years
May 1, 2008
July 2, 2015
February 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Metabolic Response of Target Lesions Assessed as the Change in Standardized Uptake Values (SUV) Max on FDG-PET/CT
FDG-PET/CT images were evaluated qualitatively as well as quantitatively by one of two experienced nuclear radiologists. For quantitative analysis, SUVmax within each of the metastatic tumor sites was determined within a volume of interest around the tumor using a Siemens eSoft workstation. Up to a maximum of three target lesions(\>= 1.5 cm on the baseline CT) were identified as target lesions on the baseline FDG-PET. When multiple lesions were present, those having the greatest FDG uptake on the baseline FDG-PET were selected as target lesions. Lesions containing areas of necrosis were avoided. Other metabolically active lesions and lesions that were \<1.5 cm on CT were considered non-target lesions. When more than one target lesion was identified, the average percentage change in SUVmax was used to determine metabolic response.
Baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment
SUVmax at up to Three Target Tumor Sites as Assessed by FDG-PET/CT of Eligible Patients at Baseline and Then After Eight Weeks of Treatment With Cetuximab.
Eight weeks of treatment is equal to one cycle of treatment. FDG-PET/CT images were evaluated qualitatively as well as quantitatively by one of two experienced nuclear radiologists. For quantitative analysis, SUVmax within each of the metastatic tumor sites was determined within a volume of interest around the tumor using a Siemens eSoft workstation. Up to a maximum of three target lesions(\>= 1.5 cm on the baseline CT) were identified as target lesions on the baseline FDG-PET. When multiple lesions were present, those having the greatest FDG uptake on the baseline FDG-PET were selected as target lesions. Lesions containing areas of necrosis were avoided. Other metabolically active lesions and lesions that were \<1.5 cm on CT were considered non-target lesions. When more than one target lesion was identified, the average percentage change in SUVmax was used to determine metabolic response.
Baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Overall Tumor Metabolic Response to Eight Weeks of Scheduled Weekly Doses of Cetuximab as Assessed by FDG-PET/CT
After 8 weeks of treatment
Overall Anatomic Response to Eight Weeks of Scheduled Weekly Doses of Cetuximab as Assessed by CT Scan
After 8 weeks of treatment
Correlation of Overall Tumor Metabolic Response as Assessed by FDG-PET/CT With the Anatomic Tumor Response Rate by RECIST Criteria as Assessed by CT and Clinical Examination
After 8 weeks of treatment
Correlation of Overall Tumor Metabolic Response as Assessed by FDG-PET/CT With the Anatomic Tumor Response Rate by RECIST Criteria as Assessed by CT and Clinical Examination
After 8 weeks of treatment
Overall Best Anatomic Tumor Response Rate to Cetuximab Given Until Disease Progression as Assessed by RECIST Criteria Using CT & Clinical Examination
Every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 1 year)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Arm 1
EXPERIMENTALWhole body FDG-PET/CT scan and CT scan of neck and chest (within 28 days of Day 1) Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on day 1 and 250 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, and 50. Whole Body FDG-PET/CT scan and CT scan of neck and chest on Day 57 (prior to cetuximab infusion) Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on Day 57 Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour weekly until progressive disease
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).
- Have either locally recurrent, unresectable, previously irradiated SCCHN OR metastatic SCCHN, with at least one measurable tumor lesion (by CT scan) and at least one FDG avid (SUV \>/= 3, \>/= 1.5 cm) tumor lesion (by PET/CT).
- Age greater than 18 yrs.
- ECOG Performance Status of 0-3
- Signed IRB approved Informed Consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical history of severe interstitial lung disease (not COPD)-as defined by prior pulmonary function tests (PFTs) with residual volume, total lung capacity, or corrected diffuse lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \<30% of predicted. For this study, screening PFT's required only if clinically indicated.
- Women of child bearing potential who are current pregnant or breast feeding.
- Prior severe (Grade 4) infusion reaction to cetuximab.
- A serious uncontrolled medical disorder that in the opinion of the Investigator would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy.
- Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or investigational agents given with the last 14 days.
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. (Subjects with a fasting blood glucose \> 200 at time of PET scanning may need to reschedule to another day after consulting with appropriate physicians.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Related Publications (23)
Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ; American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Jan-Feb;54(1):8-29. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.1.8.
PMID: 14974761BACKGROUNDMendelsohn J, Baselga J. Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2787-99. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.504.
PMID: 12860957BACKGROUNDDassonville O, Formento JL, Francoual M, Ramaioli A, Santini J, Schneider M, Demard F, Milano G. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and survival in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;11(10):1873-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.10.1873.
PMID: 8410112BACKGROUNDAng KK, Berkey BA, Tu X, Zhang HZ, Katz R, Hammond EH, Fu KK, Milas L. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor expression on survival and pattern of relapse in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002 Dec 15;62(24):7350-6.
PMID: 12499279BACKGROUNDHuang S, Armstrong EA, Benavente S, Chinnaiyan P, Harari PM. Dual-agent molecular targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): combining anti-EGFR antibody with tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5355-62. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0562.
PMID: 15289342BACKGROUNDCohen EE, Rosen F, Stadler WM, Recant W, Stenson K, Huo D, Vokes EE. Phase II trial of ZD1839 in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10):1980-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.10.051.
PMID: 12743152BACKGROUNDBonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, Ove R, Kies MS, Baselga J, Youssoufian H, Amellal N, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9;354(6):567-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053422.
PMID: 16467544BACKGROUNDBaselga J, Trigo JM, Bourhis J, Tortochaux J, Cortes-Funes H, Hitt R, Gascon P, Amellal N, Harstrick A, Eckardt A. Phase II multicenter study of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody cetuximab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5568-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.119. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
PMID: 16009950BACKGROUNDJ. Trigo et al., Cetuximab monotherapy is active in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Results of a phase II study (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 23 (2004), p. 487a.
BACKGROUNDVermeersch H, Loose D, Ham H, Otte A, Van de Wiele C. Nuclear medicine imaging for the assessment of primary and recurrent head and neck carcinoma using routinely available tracers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Dec;30(12):1689-700. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1345-4. Epub 2003 Oct 22.
PMID: 14574516BACKGROUNDAntoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Freudenberg LS. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 1;22(21):4357-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.120.
PMID: 15514377BACKGROUNDSchwartz DL, Rajendran J, Yueh B, Coltrera MD, Leblanc M, Eary J, Krohn K. FDG-PET prediction of head and neck squamous cell cancer outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Dec;130(12):1361-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.12.1361.
PMID: 15611393BACKGROUNDMinn H, Lapela M, Klemi PJ, Grenman R, Leskinen S, Lindholm P, Bergman J, Eronen E, Haaparanta M, Joensuu H. Prediction of survival with fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose and PET in head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med. 1997 Dec;38(12):1907-11.
PMID: 9430467BACKGROUNDBrun E, Kjellen E, Tennvall J, Ohlsson T, Sandell A, Perfekt R, Perfekt R, Wennerberg J, Strand SE. FDG PET studies during treatment: prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2002 Feb;24(2):127-35. doi: 10.1002/hed.10037.
PMID: 11891942BACKGROUNDWeber WA, Ott K, Becker K, Dittler HJ, Helmberger H, Avril NE, Meisetschlager G, Busch R, Siewert JR, Schwaiger M, Fink U. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun 15;19(12):3058-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.12.3058.
PMID: 11408502BACKGROUNDChoi NC, Fischman AJ, Niemierko A, Ryu JS, Lynch T, Wain J, Wright C, Fidias P, Mathisen D. Dose-response relationship between probability of pathologic tumor control and glucose metabolic rate measured with FDG PET after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Nov 15;54(4):1024-35. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03038-9.
PMID: 12419428BACKGROUNDKostakoglu L, Coleman M, Leonard JP, Kuji I, Zoe H, Goldsmith SJ. PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. J Nucl Med. 2002 Aug;43(8):1018-27.
PMID: 12163626BACKGROUNDM. Beeram et al., Durable disease stabilization and antitumor activity with OSI-774 in renal cell carcinoma: A phase II, pharmacokinetic (PK) and biological correlative study with FDG-PET imaging. J Clinical Oncology 22 (2004), pp. 3050.
BACKGROUNDT. Trarbach et al., A randomized phase I study of the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody EMD 72000 in subjects with advanced gastrointestinal cancers. J Clinical Oncology 22 (2004), pp. 3018.
BACKGROUNDGoldstein D, Tan BS, Rossleigh M, Haindl W, Walker B, Dixon J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: correlation of F-FDG gamma camera-based coincidence positron emission tomography with CT for the assessment of treatment response--an AGITG study. Oncology. 2005;69(4):326-32. doi: 10.1159/000089765. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
PMID: 16293972BACKGROUNDAntoch G, Kanja J, Bauer S, Kuehl H, Renzing-Koehler K, Schuette J, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Freudenberg LS. Comparison of PET, CT, and dual-modality PET/CT imaging for monitoring of imatinib (STI571) therapy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Nucl Med. 2004 Mar;45(3):357-65.
PMID: 15001674BACKGROUNDGayed I, Vu T, Iyer R, Johnson M, Macapinlac H, Swanston N, Podoloff D. The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Nucl Med. 2004 Jan;45(1):17-21.
PMID: 14734662BACKGROUNDBristol-Meyer-Squibb, Product Information for Erbitux, 2004.
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Douglas R. Adkins
- Organization
- Washington University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas Adkins, M.D.
Washington University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2008
First Posted
May 5, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 14, 2017
Results First Posted
August 10, 2015
Record last verified: 2017-02