A Study of Oral LBH589 in Adult Patients With Advanced Hematological Malignancies
A Phase IA/II, Two-arm, Multi-center, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study of LBH589 Administered Orally Via Different Dosing Schedules in Adult Patients With Advanced Hematological Malignancies
2 other identifiers
interventional
175
3 countries
7
Brief Summary
This study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary anti-leukemic or anti-tumor activity of LBH589B in adult patients with advanced hematological malignancies
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 lymphoma
Started Mar 2003
Longer than P75 for phase_1 lymphoma
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 3, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 3, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 17, 2017
CompletedJanuary 5, 2021
July 1, 2017
6.8 years
February 12, 2008
October 24, 2016
December 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants DLT in Arm 1 in Dose Escalation Phase
Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for consecutive dosing schedule (MWF weekly). A 3-parameter version of a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control (Babb, Rogatko, and Zacks 1998) was used during the dose escalation phase for dose level selection and determination of the MTD.
Cycle 1 (28-day treatment cycle)
Number of Participants DLT in Arm 2 in Dose Escalation Phase
Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for intermittent dosing schedule (MWF weekly). A 3-parameter version of a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control (Babb, Rogatko, and Zacks 1998) was used during the dose escalation phase for dose level selection and determination of the MTD.
Cycle 1 (28-day treamtent cycle)
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Response as Per Investigator Assessment for Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
3.5 years
Response as Per Investigator Assessment for Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) in Expansion Phase
1.2 years
Response as Per Investigator Assessment for Patients With Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HD)
3.5 years
Response as Per Investigator Assessment for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
3.5 years
Maximum Plasma Concentration of Panobinostat After the First Dose in Arms 1 and 2
Day 1
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Arm 1, Group X
EXPERIMENTALArm 1, Group Y
EXPERIMENTALArm 2, Group X
EXPERIMENTALArm 2, Group Y
EXPERIMENTALPanobinostat was administered orally, once-a-day, on Monday-Wednesday-Friday (MWF), every other week, as part of a 28-day treatment cycle. Group Y is a sub-arm, based on disease indication.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (≥18 years old) with advanced hematological malignancies who relapsed after or are refractory to standard therapy, or for which no standard therapy existed; or, were considered inappropriate candidates for standard therapy
- World Health Organization (WHO) performance status ≤ 2
- Patients who met protocol-specified hematologic and non-hematologic laboratory values
- Patients with adequate liver and renal function
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent brain metastases or leukemic infiltration of the cerebrospinal fluid
- Peripheral neuropathy ≥ CTCAE grade 2
- Unresolved diarrhea ≥ CTCAE grade 2
- Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions which could compromise participation in the study, including impaired heart function or clinically significant heart disease, and impaired gastrointestinal function or disease that significantly altered aborption of LBH589
- Female patients who were pregnant or breast feeding
- Patients who were unwilling to use an effective method of birth control
- Patients who took medications specified by the protocol as prohibited for administration in combination with LBH589
- Patients with another primary malignancy that required active intervention or were clinically significant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Georgia Health Sciences University Dept.ofMedicalCollegeOfGeorgia
Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center/University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Parkville, Victoria, 3002, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Prahran, Victoria, 3181, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt/M, 60590, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, 55131, Germany
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2008
First Posted
February 22, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2003
Primary Completion
December 3, 2009
Study Completion
December 3, 2009
Last Updated
January 5, 2021
Results First Posted
August 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07