Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Treating Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Received Previous Treatment for Brain Metastases
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Breast Cancer Patients With Brian Metastases That Have Progressed After Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Whole Brain Radiation
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan and temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects of giving irinotecan together with temozolomide and to see how well it works in treating patients with breast cancer who have received previous treatment for brain metastases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 breast-cancer
Started Feb 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_2 breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 20, 2018
CompletedApril 20, 2018
March 1, 2018
7.9 years
February 15, 2008
December 11, 2017
March 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Patients With Objective Treatment Response (Complete or Partial) in the CNS
Imaging was performed at 8-week intervals to assess response to treatment. Patients with known or suspected leptomeningeal disease were deemed to have a complete response if CSF cytology converted to negative (if positive at baseline) and all meningeal enhancement or nodularity of brain and/or spine MRI resolved. A modified RECIST 1.0 criteria was used to assess CNS response for patients with new or progressing brain metastases. In this modified RECIST criteria, CNS lesions \<1cm were not considered measurable, but were considered evaluable for response and progression. Progressive disease for patients with lesions \<1 cm was defined as follows: growth of a lesion from less than or equal to 5 mm to greater than or equal to 10mm; or, growth of a 6-9 mm lesion by at least 5 mm in the case of non-target parenchymal brain metastases.
Baseline scan prior to study entry was performed within 14 days of cycle 1 day 1, then every 8 weeks from then until disease progression or up to 2 years
Number of Patients Experiencing a Clinical Benefit
The number of patients experiencing a clinical benefit is the sum of patients with an objective response plus patients with stable disease at ≥ 16 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 (first day of treatment). If a patient did not come back for a follow up scan after clinical deterioration, then they were only considered stable up to the time of the last scan they had per protocol.
From 1 day 1 (first day of treatment) every 8 weeks until scan shows disease progression or up to 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time to First Progression in CNS
Baseline scan prior to study entry was performed within 14 days of cycle 1 day 1, then every 8 weeks from then until disease progression or up to 2 years
Overall Time of Survival
Time from initiation of study participation until death or up to 3 years
Number of Patients Whose Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) Decreased From >5 to <5 CTCs Per 7.5 mL
CTCs drawn on cycle 1 day 1, collection at 8 week intervals on patients who did not progress on their 8 week scans up to 2 years
Study Arms (1)
irinotecan and temozolomide
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michelle Melisko, MD
- Organization
- University of California San Francisco
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle Melisko, MD
University of California, San Francisco
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2008
First Posted
February 18, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2005
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 20, 2018
Results First Posted
April 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03