Study Stopped
Observed lower cure rates and higher mortality rates in one of the treatment groups.
To Compare Safety and Efficacy of Doripenem Versus Imipenem-Cilastatin in Patients With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Doripenem Compared With Imipenem-Cilastatin in the Treatment of Subjects With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
3 other identifiers
interventional
274
21 countries
100
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to show that doripenem is as effective as imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2008
Typical duration for phase_3
100 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 18, 2012
CompletedDecember 28, 2012
December 1, 2012
3.2 years
December 21, 2007
June 13, 2012
December 24, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit
The number of patients who achieved clinical cure at the EOT visit on Day 10. The patient's were classified as clinical cure if they had resolution of signs and symptoms and objective findings of pneumonia to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary.
End-of-treatment (Day 10 or Day 11)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit in Patients From Whom a Qualifying P. Aeruginosa Was Isolated at Baseline
End-of-treatment (Day 10 or Day 11)
Clinical Cure Rate at the End-of-treatment (EOT) Visit in Patients From Whom at Least 1 of the Gram-negative Qualifying Pneumonia Pathogens (Enterobacteriaceae, P. Aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter Spp) Was Isolated at Baseline
End-of-treatment (Day 10 or Day 11)
Number of Patients Who Had Emergence of P. Aeruginosa Resistance
Up to 6 weeks
28-day All-cause Mortality Rate
Up to 28 days
Study Arms (2)
Doripenem
EXPERIMENTALDoripenem from Days 1 to 7 and imipenem-cilastatin placebo from Days 1 to 10
Imipenem-Cilastatin
ACTIVE COMPARATORImipenem-Cilastatin Days 1 to 10 and doripenem placebo from Days 1 to 7
Interventions
Type=exact number, number=1, unit=g, form=solution for injection, route=intravenously. 1 gram 4-hour infusion of doripenem will be administered every 8 hours for 7 days.
Type=exact number, number=1, unit=g, form=solution for injection, route=intravenously. 1 gram 1-hour infusion of imipenem-cilastatin will be administered every 8 hours for 10 days.
Form=solution, route=intravenous. Doripenem pacebo will be administered from Days 1 to 7 in imipenem-cilastatin arm and imipenem-cilastatin placebo will be administered in doripenem arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must have new or worsening radiographic infiltrates consistent with ventilator-associated pneumonia that was not related to cardiac or other disease processes
- Have at least 1 of the following: fever (core body temperature greater than 39.0°C); hypothermia (core body temperature of less than 35.0°C); leukocytosis (increased WBC count); and leukopenia (decreased WBC count)
- Have developed ventilator-associated pneumonia and have been on mechanical ventilation for more than or equal to 48 hours and on mechanical ventilation at the time that study medication is assigned
- Have been hospitalized or been in a chronic care facility for consecutive 5 days or more within the last 90 days
- Have a baseline Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) more than or equal to 6 and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score more than 8 and less than 35
You may not qualify if:
- Have received antibiotics for this episode of ventilator-associated pneumonia for more than 24 hours before study medication administration
- Known presence at baseline of only methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Stenotrophomonas infection
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome
- Has any of the following conditions: chest trauma with severe lung bruising or loss of stability of the thoracic cage following a fracture of the sternum, ribs, or both, increased amounts of fluid in the lung cavities requiring drainage or pus in the cavity
- Has active seizure disorder within the last 2 years or brain injury such that imipenem cilastatin would not be administered to the patient in usual practice
- Has lung cancer within the last 2 years, chronic bronchitis with an increase in severity within the last 30 days, chronic enlargement of the bronchi or bronchioles related to inflammatory disease or obstruction, lung abscess(s), anatomical bronchial obstruction, respiratory tuberculosis on treatment, suspected atypical pneumonia, chemical pneumonitis, cystic fibrosis, congestive heart failure, severe burns to greater than 15% of the body, evidence of severe and chronic liver disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (100)
Unknown Facility
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Newark, Delaware, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Moline, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Hazard, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Biddeford, Maine, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Butte, Montana, United States
Unknown Facility
Buffalo, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Entre Ríos, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Monte Grande, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rio Negro, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rosario, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Adelaide, Australia
Unknown Facility
Box Hill, Australia
Unknown Facility
Clayton, Australia
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Australia
Unknown Facility
Parkville, Australia
Unknown Facility
Brussels, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Ghent, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Curitiba, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Fortaleza, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Santo André, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São José do Rio Preto, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Argenteuil, France
Unknown Facility
Limoges, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Pierre-Bénite, France
Unknown Facility
Tours, France
Unknown Facility
Dresden, Germany
Unknown Facility
Halle, Germany
Unknown Facility
Homburg/Saar, Germany
Unknown Facility
Lübeck, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mannheim, Germany
Unknown Facility
Ulm, Germany
Unknown Facility
Cuilapa, Guatemala
Unknown Facility
Escuintla Escuintla, Guatemala
Unknown Facility
Guatemala City, Guatemala
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Budapest Na, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Székesfehérvár, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, India
Unknown Facility
Coimbatore, India
Unknown Facility
Ludhiana, India
Unknown Facility
New Delhi, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, India
Unknown Facility
Afula, Israel
Unknown Facility
Petah Tikva, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ramat Gan, Israel
Unknown Facility
Chihuahua City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Monterrey, Mexico
Unknown Facility
San Luis Potosí City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Zapopan, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Manila, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Quezon City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Lisbon, Portugal
Unknown Facility
Porto, Portugal
Unknown Facility
Brasov, Romania
Unknown Facility
Târgu Mureş, Romania
Unknown Facility
Timișoara, Romania
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saratov, Russia
Unknown Facility
Smolensk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yaroslavl, Russia
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
Unknown Facility
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Tarragona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Khon Kaen, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Nakhonratchasima, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Trabzon, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Odesa, Ukraine
Related Publications (1)
Kollef MH, Chastre J, Clavel M, Restrepo MI, Michiels B, Kaniga K, Cirillo I, Kimko H, Redman R. A randomized trial of 7-day doripenem versus 10-day imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care. 2012 Nov 13;16(6):R218. doi: 10.1186/cc11862.
PMID: 23148736DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
41 patients (21 doripenem, 20 imipenem-cilastatin) were enrolled at 5 sites that were found to be Good Clinical Practice non-compliant and were excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analyses.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr Director Clinical Development
- Organization
- Janssen R&D US
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2007
First Posted
January 10, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 28, 2012
Results First Posted
July 18, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12