Short Infusion Versus Prolonged Infusion of Ceftolozane-tazobactam Among Patients with Ventilator Associated-pneumonia
CEFTOREA
Comparison of Short Infusion Versus Prolonged Infusion of Ceftolozane-tazobactam Among Patients with Ventilator Associated-pneumonia to Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Intensive Care Units
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare the median exposures at pharmacokinetic equilibrium of the two modalities of administration: 4-hours infusion of ceftolozane-tazobactam at a dosage of 2 gram three times a day vs 1-hour infusion of 2 gram three times a day.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 25, 2024
September 1, 2024
6.4 years
June 26, 2018
September 23, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time that the concentration spends above 5 Minimum inhibitory Concentration (T>5*MIC)
The primary endpoint is the time that the concentration spends above 5\* Minimum inhibitory Concentration, expressed as a percentage of the time interval between two administrations. The T\>5\* Minimum inhibitory Concentration will be determined for each patient from the concentration profile measured over an 8-hour post-administration interval. Since protein binding is low (\<20%), the total concentration (sum of free form and plasma protein bound) will be used as a marker for free concentration. Therefore, the T\>5\* Minimum inhibitory Concentration will be calculated from the total concentrations. Our study will focus on only Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation with a critical Minimum inhibitory Concentration of 4 mg/l, T\>5\* Minimum inhibitory Concentration will then correspond to a residual serum concentration of 20 mg/l.
Time between two administrations (8 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Percentage of patients with concentrations greater than 5*Minimum inhibitory Concentration
Time between two administrations (8 hours)
Bactericidal rate
at Day 10
Percentage of patients recovering at the end of the treatment period
at Day 10
Percentage of patients failing at the end of the treatment period
at Day 10
Number of days without artificial ventilation
at Day 28
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1 hour infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe first group corresponds to 1-hour infusion : First administration of ceftolozane-tazobactam with 2000 mg by infusion for 60 minutes every 8 hours. 24h after this first administration, 7 blood samples will be collected at Hour 24, Hour 25, Hour 26, Hour 28, Hour 30, Hour 32 and Hour 48.
4 hours infusion
EXPERIMENTALThe second group corresponds to 4-hours infusion: First administration of ceftolozane-tazobactam with 2000 mg by infusion for 4 hours every 8 hours. 24h after this first administration, 7 blood samples will be collected at Hour 24, Hour 25, Hour 26, Hour 28, Hour 30, Hour 32 and Hour 48. .
Interventions
Intravenous administration of ceftolozane-tazobactam (ZERBAXA®) : 2000 mg by infusion for 60 minutes every 8 hours.
Intravenous administration of ceftolozane-tazobactam (ZERBAXA®) : 2000 mg by infusion for 4 hours every 8 hours
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with ventilator associated-pneumonia to Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- patients hospitalized in intensive care units
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam
- Simplified Acute Physiological Score II (SAPS II () \> 20
- Expected duration of survival \> 7 days
- Informed consent of the patient or, failing that, the patient's close or trustworthy person
- Affiliated to a social security scheme or equivalent
- history of allergy to one of the two molecules
- history of allergy to betalactamines
- Strain Isolated resistant to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam combination
- Renal insufficiency with a glomerular filtration rate evaluated by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) \< 50 ml/min
- Patient on dialysis or under continuous hemodiafiltration
- pregnant or nursing women
- patient benefiting from a system of legal protection for adults
- patient with active immunodepression.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Service Réanimation Polyvalente - CHU Rangueil
Toulouse, 31059, France
Related Publications (5)
Colomb-Cotinat M, Lacoste J, Brun-Buisson C, Jarlier V, Coignard B, Vaux S. Estimating the morbidity and mortality associated with infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB), France, 2012. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Dec 12;5:56. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0154-z. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27999665BACKGROUNDVincent JL, Bassetti M, Francois B, Karam G, Chastre J, Torres A, Roberts JA, Taccone FS, Rello J, Calandra T, De Backer D, Welte T, Antonelli M. Advances in antibiotic therapy in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2016 May 17;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1285-6.
PMID: 27184564BACKGROUNDGelfand MS, Cleveland KO. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Therapy of Respiratory Infections due to Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 1;61(5):853-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ411. Epub 2015 May 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 26021991BACKGROUNDMonogue ML, Pettit RS, Muhlebach M, Cies JJ, Nicolau DP, Kuti JL. Population Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients Admitted with Acute Pulmonary Exacerbation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Oct 21;60(11):6578-6584. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01566-16. Print 2016 Nov.
PMID: 27550351BACKGROUNDXiao AJ, Miller BW, Huntington JA, Nicolau DP. Ceftolozane/tazobactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-derived dose justification for phase 3 studies in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;56(1):56-66. doi: 10.1002/jcph.566. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
PMID: 26096377BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stéphanie RUIZ, MD
University Hospital, Toulouse
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2018
First Posted
July 10, 2018
Study Start
September 20, 2018
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share