NCT00564083

Brief Summary

This research protocol is a randomized controlled trial. It is being done to compare and find out the relative differences between the materials, (Pelivisoft) "natural organic mesh" to poly propylene mesh (Pelvitex) "manmade mesh" after a surgery known as sacral colpopexy. This surgery involves supporting the prolapsed vaginal wall with a piece of material (known as a graft) attached to a ligament along your backbone (or sacrum). These materials are both FDA approved and widely used. The following objectives: anatomic outcomes, graft-related complications between the two materials, changes in pelvic organ prolapse-related quality of life, subjective changes in sexual function,changes in bowel function and the prolapse related pain present after sacral colpopexy will be evaluated. The study visits are all under standard of care. Study questionnaires are unique to the study and will be completed at the enrollment in hospital, 2, 6,12 weeks, 6 months and one year visits The questionnaires are related to bowel function, bladder function, prolapse and sexual activity. Permission will be requested to contact the patient again 5 years after surgery. Contact in the future will in no way obligate the patient to participate. There may or may not be direct medical benefits to the participant. Decreased risk of erosion may be a possible benefit if placed in the organic "natural" arm of the study. The information learned from this study may benefit other patients in the future

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2005

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2005

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 26, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 27, 2007

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

March 22, 2011

Status Verified

November 1, 2007

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

November 26, 2007

Last Update Submit

March 21, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

Compare the relative differences between the organic and sythentic materials for sacryl colpopexy.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • anatomic outcomes,graft-related complications between the two materials, changes in pelvic organ prolapse-related quality of life,subjective changes in sexual function,changes in bowel function and the prolapse related pain present after sacral colpopexy

    One year

Interventions

This surgery involves supporting the prolapsed vaginal wall with a piece of material (known as a graft) attached to a ligament along your backbone (or sacrum)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Greater than 18 years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior sacral colpopexy or rectopexy
  • Contraindication to surgery based on co-existent medical condition
  • Desire for expectant management or pessary use
  • Pregnancy or the desire for pregnancy within 24 months of the sacral colpopexy procedure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Urogynecology, 95 Madison Ave.

Morristown, New Jersey, 07960, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Culligan PJ, Salamon C, Priestley JL, Shariati A. Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):143-51. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827558dc.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Uterine Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesPelvic Organ ProlapseProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Patrick Culligan, MD

    Atlantic Health Urogynecology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2007

First Posted

November 27, 2007

Study Start

December 1, 2005

Primary Completion

March 1, 2010

Study Completion

June 1, 2010

Last Updated

March 22, 2011

Record last verified: 2007-11

Locations