Outcomes of Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Graft Reinforced Anterior Prolapse Repair
Outcome After Anterior Vaginal Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is determine whether grafted anterior vaginal prolapse repair is more effective and associated with less complications than prolapse repair with suture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2005
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 28, 2011
CompletedApril 22, 2015
April 1, 2015
3.2 years
September 24, 2007
May 4, 2011
April 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrent Stage II or Greater Anterior Vaginal Prolapse
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Point Ba is the most distal position of any part of the anterior vagina between point Aa and the vaginal cuff or anterior vaginal fornix. Better vaginal support is assigned a negative value (ie, if there is no prolapse, point Ba is -3 cm by definition). Vaginal prolapse beyond the hymen, indicating worse vaginal support, is assigned a positive value (this may be equal to the total vaginal length at the maximum). Recurrent stage II or greater anterior vaginal prolapse is defined as POPQ Point Ba measurement equal to or greater (more positive) than -1.
three years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Operative Time
perioperative
Vaginal Mesh Exposure
perioperative
Study Arms (2)
Anterior Colporrhaphy (sutured repair)
PLACEBO COMPARATORAnterior vaginal prolapse repair with anterior colporrhaphy (no graft) using sutures.
Perigee (grafted repair)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnterior vaginal prolapse repair with graft
Interventions
anterior vaginal prolapse repair with graft
anterior vaginal prolapse repair with suture
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- stage II or greater anterior vaginal prolapse requiring surgical correction
- age 21 years and older
You may not qualify if:
- less than Stage II anterior vaginal prolapse
- decline participation
- pregnant or contemplating future pregnancy
- prior anterior vaginal prolapse repair with biologic or synthetic graft
- active or latent systemic infection
- compromised immune system
- previous pelvic irradiation or cancer
- known hypersensitivity to polypropylene
- uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- unable or unwilling to give valid informed consent
- unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol
- scheduled to undergo concomitant Burch colposuspension or pubovaginal sling
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kaiser Permanente
Downey, California, 90242, United States
Related Publications (2)
Gauruder-Burmester A, Koutouzidou P, Rohne J, Gronewold M, Tunn R. Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Sep;18(9):1059-64. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0291-7. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
PMID: 17219252BACKGROUNDNguyen JN, Burchette RJ. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;111(4):891-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816a2489.
PMID: 18378748DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
-Small number of subjects, Single surgeon, Medium follow-up, Limited ability to detect uncommon adverse events and small differences in quality of life and sexual symptom scores, Concurrent pelvic reconstructive and anti-incontinence procedures
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John N. Nguyen, MD
- Organization
- SCPMG/Kaiser Permanente
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John N Nguyen, MD
Southern California Permanente Medical Group
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2007
First Posted
September 26, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
April 1, 2008
Study Completion
April 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 22, 2015
Results First Posted
July 28, 2011
Record last verified: 2015-04