Clinical Assessment of Two Manipulative Protocols in Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Manipulative Protocols to Assess Changes in Pain, ROM, Quality of Life, Cost and Risk for Falls in Subjects With Hip Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
120
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
Purpose of this study is to examine the effect of chiropractic adjusting (manipulative therapy) and rehabilitation on hip osteoarthritis (hip OA) in older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Oct 2007
Typical duration for early_phase_1
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedJuly 19, 2010
July 1, 2010
2.3 years
August 29, 2007
July 16, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Recruit a pool of HOA patients from senior centers, the local community, medical and chiropractic clinics, and through advertising in collaboration with other Universities/Colleges or Schools.
Nine Months
Establish protocols for long-term surveillance of OAH in chiropractic patients.
2 years
integrate a clinical research program with a teaching clinic system.
Two years
Collect and compare protocol outcome data. Primary outcome measure will be: a 6 point Likert scale.
2 years
Study Arms (3)
Group A
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1\) Group A will receive 9 manipulative therapy treatments (adjustments) to one area: the hip with pre-manipulative static and post active-assisted stretch of tight hip muscles. After the last (or 9th) treatment these patients will receive general advice and recommendations on managing HOA and how to gently and safely increase general exercise. • Based on a previous trial, Group A treatment appears superior than placebo. There will be a 3, 6 and 9 month follow up.
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2\) Group B will receive 9 treatments with manipulative therapy treatments (adjustments) to the entire kinetic chain (five areas): the lumbosacral, sacroiliac, hip, knee, ankle and foot joints with pre-manipulative static and post active-assisted stretch of tight hip muscles. There will be a 3, 6 and 9 month follow up.
Supportive Care
OTHERSupportive Care 3) Groups A and B will receive supportive care after the 9th visit consisting of (up to a maximum of) 6 visits, PRN or as needed, until the 9 month follow up. This is to see if peak gains may be maintained (as noted in the previous trial) throughout the follow up period. Enrolled subjects will commonly receive 2 treatments per week (occasionally, less or more than 1 to 2 treatments per week due to (College or University) semester breaks, exams, clinic closures and so forth) until 9 treatments are completed.
Interventions
Active comparator will receive 9 treatments of manual or manipulative therapy to the hip (HVLA hip manipulations per protocol 1) with pre-manipulative static and post manipulative active-assisted stretch of hip muscles after each manipulation.
Active comparator will receive 9 treatments of manual or manipulative therapy to the lumbosacral, sacroiliac, hip and knee, ankle and foot joints (HVLA and Grades I-IV mobilization per protocol 2) stretching and exercise.)
Supportive Care 3) Groups A and B will receive supportive care after the 9th visit consisting of (up to a maximum of) 6 visits, PRN or as needed, until the 9 month follow up. This is to see if peak gains may be maintained (as noted in the previous trial) throughout the follow up period. Enrolled subjects will commonly receive 2 treatments per week (occasionally, less or more than 1 to 2 treatments per week due to (College or University) semester breaks, exams, clinic closures and so forth) until 9 treatments are completed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hip pain and \< 15° internal rotation and \< than 115° flexion or
- Age ≥ 60 and ≤ 85 years of age
- Diagnosis of concurrent subluxation complex
- \* Diagnosis of subluxation complex (aka segmental joint dysfunction) will be supported throughout using the PART(S) system.
- Additionally, OAH patients, who demonstrate a + One Legged Standing Test (OLST) and + Berg Balance Scale (BBS) will be monitored as a subgroup (with OLST and BBS) at all assessments.
You may not qualify if:
- General and internal medical disorders such as:
- Significant visual disorders
- Severe vestibular disorders (i.e., Meniere's)
- Neurological (including Alzheimer's and other degenerative brain and mental disorders, disease and dysfunction) peripheral sensory disorders (severe insulin dependent diabetes)
- Hip joint replacement
- Instability
- Fracture/ and severe osteoporosis
- Frank avascular necrosis with or without moderate or severe deformity
- Lumbar herniated disc and injury
- Severe balance and proprioception problems (i.e., inability to stand with and/or without marked spinal or hip deformity) etc.
- Symptoms (moderate to severe) in both hips.
- Marked or severe fear of chiropractic adjustments/manipulative and or exercise procedures.
- Breaks for treatment longer than 3-4 weeks depending on each circumstance or merit may be construed as non-compliance and may be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cleveland Chiropractic Collegelead
- Durban University of Technologycollaborator
- Macquarie University, Australiacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Cleveland Chiropractic College Health Center
Los Angeles, California, 90004, United States
Macquarie University
Sydney, Australia
Durban University of Technology
Durban, South Africa
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Brantingham, D.C., Ph.D.
Cleveland Chiropractic College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2007
First Posted
August 31, 2007
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
July 19, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-07