Study Stopped
High early failure rates and adverse reactions in similar devices
Whole Blood Metal Ion Concentrations in Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing
1 other identifier
interventional
75
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The investigators aimed to investigate the possible differences in metal ion concentrations in patients following one of two types of metal-on-metal articulating hip prosthesis regarding chromium and cobalt concentration, radiological findings, patient reported outcome measures and rate of revision at 5-years follow up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 3, 2023
CompletedMarch 3, 2023
March 1, 2023
10.2 years
September 23, 2020
September 30, 2021
March 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Metal Ion Concentrations in Blood
Chromium and cobalt concentrations in whole blood
at 5 years follow up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Harris Hip Score
at 5 years follow up
SF-36
at 5 years follow up
Number of Patients Undergoing Revision
at 5 years follow up
Study Arms (2)
Magnum
ACTIVE COMPARATORA metal-on-metal large diameter head total hip arthroplasty
Recap
ACTIVE COMPARATORA metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary or secondary hip osteoarthritis eligible for hip replacement surgery
- Able to give informed consent
- Able to complete follow up consultations
You may not qualify if:
- Earlier or present infection of the hip
- Severe systemic or metabolic disease leading to weakening of the bone
- Severe congenital hip dysplasia
- Osteoporosis and/or renal disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (26)
Schmalzried TP, Peters PC, Maurer BT, Bragdon CR, Harris WH. Long-duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Apr;11(3):322-31. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80085-4.
PMID: 8713913BACKGROUNDChan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Tanzer M. The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Dec;(369):10-24. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00003.
PMID: 10611857BACKGROUNDCuckler JM, Moore KD, Lombardi AV Jr, McPherson E, Emerson R. Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8 Suppl 3):41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.006.
PMID: 15578551BACKGROUNDPeters CL, McPherson E, Jackson JD, Erickson JA. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.019. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
PMID: 17823033BACKGROUNDPapageorgiou I, Yin Z, Ladon D, Baird D, Lewis AC, Sood A, Newson R, Learmonth ID, Case CP. Genotoxic effects of particles of surgical cobalt chrome alloy on human cells of different age in vitro. Mutat Res. 2007 Jun 1;619(1-2):45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
PMID: 17376492BACKGROUNDLangton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland JP, Nargol AV, De Smet KA. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Feb;93(2):164-71. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25099.
PMID: 21282753BACKGROUNDWhitehouse MR, Aquilina AL, Patel S, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Blom AW. Survivorship, patient reported outcome and satisfaction following resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):842-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PMID: 23489727BACKGROUNDLangton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: A consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jan;92(1):38-46. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22770.
PMID: 20044676BACKGROUNDBozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1614-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01220.
PMID: 19571083BACKGROUNDMahomed NN, Arndt DC, McGrory BJ, Harris WH. The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Aug;16(5):575-80. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.23716.
PMID: 11503116BACKGROUNDDeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Nov-Dec;(121):20-32.
PMID: 991504BACKGROUNDGruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jun;(141):17-27.
PMID: 477100BACKGROUNDCallanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, Malchau H. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):319-29. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1487-1.
PMID: 20717858BACKGROUNDBorgwardt A, Borgwardt L, Zerahn B, Daugaard H, Borgwardt L, Ribel-Madsen S. A Randomized Seven-Year Study on Performance of the Stemmed Metal M2a-Magnum and Ceramic C2a-Taper, and the Resurfacing ReCap Hip Implants. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1412-1420. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.061. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
PMID: 29276121BACKGROUNDCosta ML, Achten J, Parsons NR, Edlin RP, Foguet P, Prakash U, Griffin DR; Young Adult Hip Arthroplasty Team. Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012 Apr 19;344:e2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2147.
PMID: 22517930BACKGROUNDGarbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):318-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1029-x. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
PMID: 19697090BACKGROUNDKhan M, Kuiper JH, Sieniawska C, Richardson JB. Differences in concentration of metal debris in blood, serum, and plasma samples of patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2015 Dec 9;13(4):450-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.10.006. eCollection 2016 Dec.
PMID: 27857480BACKGROUNDJantzen C, Jorgensen HL, Duus BR, Sporring SL, Lauritzen JB. Chromium and cobalt ion concentrations in blood and serum following various types of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a literature overview. Acta Orthop. 2013 Jun;84(3):229-36. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.792034. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
PMID: 23594249BACKGROUNDRenner L, Faschingbauer M, Schmidt-Braekling T, Boettner F. Cobalt serum levels differ in well functioning Birmingham resurfacing and Birmingham modular THA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 May;136(5):715-21. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2439-3. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PMID: 26983720BACKGROUNDHutt J, Lavigne M, Lungu E, Belzile E, Morin F, Vendittoli PA. Comparison of Whole-Blood Metal Ion Levels Among Four Types of Large-Head, Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Implants: A Concise Follow-up, at Five Years, of a Previous Report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Feb 17;98(4):257-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00201.
PMID: 26888673BACKGROUNDJacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NJ, Paprosky WG, Black J, Galante JO. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Oct;80(10):1447-58. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199810000-00006.
PMID: 9801213BACKGROUNDBerstock JR, Whitehouse MR, Duncan CP. Trunnion corrosion: what surgeons need to know in 2018. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1 Supple A):44-49. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0569.R1.
PMID: 29292339BACKGROUNDVarnum C, Pedersen AB, Makela K, Eskelinen A, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Overgaard S. Increased risk of revision of cementless stemmed total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):469-76. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1023132. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
PMID: 25715878BACKGROUNDJunnila M, Kostensalo I, Virolainen P, Remes V, Matilainen M, Vahlberg T, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Itala A, Makela K. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Scand J Surg. 2014 Mar;103(1):54-9. doi: 10.1177/1457496913495345. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
PMID: 24345980BACKGROUNDJack CM, Walter WL, Shimmin AJ, Cashman K, de Steiger RN. Large diameter metal on metal articulations. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Apr;28(4):650-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.032. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
PMID: 23140992BACKGROUNDHersnaes PN, Gromov K, Otte KS, Gebuhr PH, Troelsen A. Harris Hip Score and SF-36 following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing - a randomized controlled trial with 5-years follow up including 75 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 12;22(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04671-1.
PMID: 34511090DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to a revision rate of 16.7% in the MoM-HR group and lost at follow up (15.4% and 13.9% for MoM-LDH-THA and MoM-HR respectively) in both groups data were not complete. No preoperative data were obtained for our primary or secondary outcomes. Due to premature termination of the study it lacks power causing a risk of type II error.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- MD Peter Nyby Hersnaes
- Organization
- Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Orthopaedic Department
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anders Troelsen, MD
Hvidovre University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Both the care provider and patient were blinded until day of surgery. The laboratory analyzing blood metal concentrations were blinded to treatment allocation throughout the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, dr.med., Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2020
First Posted
October 14, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 11, 2017
Study Completion
January 11, 2017
Last Updated
March 3, 2023
Results First Posted
March 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No IPD are to be shared with other researchers.