NCT00522951

Brief Summary

This study is conducted to compare the contrast effect and safety of SH L562BB with ProHance, which has already been approved as a pharmaceutical product of similar indication.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
165

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2007

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

20 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2007

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2007

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2008

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 3, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

August 28, 2017

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

August 29, 2007

Results QC Date

July 5, 2011

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

MRIBrain MetastasisGadoliniumImagingDiagnostic Agent

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Lesions Detected by Blinded Readers (BR) and Investigator

    Number of metastatic lesions (unenhanced and enhanced) per participant detected on postcontrast Magnetic resonance (MR) images by averaged blinded reader and investigator

    one day

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Score of Visibility Assessment - Degree of Lesion Contrast Enhancement by Blinded Reader

    one day

  • Score of Visibility Assessment - Degree of Lesion Contrast Enhancement by Investigator

    one day

  • Score of Visibility Assessment - Border Delineation by Blinded Reader

    one day

  • Score of Visibility Assessment - Border Delineation by Investigator

    one day

  • Treatment Planning Confidence - Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw vs. Gadoteridol (ProHance) 0.2 mmol/kg bw by Treatment Planning Experts (TPE)

    one day

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received first injection (intravenous \[i.v.\]) of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (bw), corresponding to a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bw

Drug: Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)

Gadobutrol 0.2 mmol/kg bw

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received second injection (i.v.) of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a total dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bw. The interval of two bolus injections is 13-15 min

Drug: Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)

Gadoteridol (ProHance)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received two injections (i.v.) of gadoteridol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a total dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bw. The interval of two bolus injections is 13-15 min

Drug: ProHance

Interventions

Gadobutrol enhanced MRI (first injection of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bw)

Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg bw

ProHance enhanced MRI (two injections of gadoteridol 0.1 mmol/kg bw, corresponding to a total dose of 0.2 mmol/kg bw)

Gadoteridol (ProHance)

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Japanese patients at least 20 years of age
  • Patients with diagnosed primary cancer
  • Patients with metastatic lesions by CT/MRI

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have contraindication to the MRI examinations
  • Patients who have severe renal disorder
  • Patients in extremely serious general condition

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (20)

Unknown Facility

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464-0021, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Matsuyama, Ehime, 791-0280, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8570, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kobe, Hyōgo, 650-0047, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 228-8555, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Yokohama, Kanagawa, 222-0036, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Habikino, Osaka, 583-0852, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Habikino, Osaka, 583-8588, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-8558, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sunto, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Yonago, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Osaka, 558-8558, Japan

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Katakami N, Inaba Y, Sugata S, Tsurusaki M, Itoh T, Machida T, Tanaka H, Nakayama T, Morikawa T, Breuer J, Aitoku Y. Magnetic resonance evaluation of brain metastases from systemic malignances with two doses of gadobutrol 1.0 m compared with gadoteridol: a multicenter, phase ii/iii study in patients with known or suspected brain metastases. Invest Radiol. 2011 Jul;46(7):411-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182145a6c.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Neoplasms

Interventions

gadobutrolgadoteridol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsNervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area Head
Organization
BAYER

Study Officials

  • Bayer Study Director

    Bayer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2007

First Posted

August 30, 2007

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion

August 1, 2008

Study Completion

August 1, 2008

Last Updated

August 28, 2017

Results First Posted

August 3, 2011

Record last verified: 2017-07

Locations