Safety and Efficacy of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar ( Gadavist ) in Patients for Central Nervous System (CNS) Imaging
A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar (Gadavist) in Patients Referred for Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Central Nervous System (CNS).
1 other identifier
interventional
343
5 countries
37
Brief Summary
This is a study involving the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contrast agents called Gadavist. The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of Gadavist when used for taking images of the brain and spine. The results of the MRI will be compared to the results of images taken without Gadavist.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Dec 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
37 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 6, 2011
CompletedFebruary 10, 2014
January 1, 2014
1 year
February 18, 2008
June 20, 2011
January 16, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 1 (BR1)
BR1 (reader 1 of 3) evaluated the images from the unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible.
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 2 (BR2)
BR2 (reader 2 of 3) evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible.
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 3 (BR3)
BR3 (reader 3 of 3) evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible.
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader (AR)
The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. The 3 BRs evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible.
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Number of Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Readers
The 3 blinded readers evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another to determine the total number of lesions.
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Number of Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 1 (BR1)
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 2 (BR2)
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 3 (BR3)
Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Gadobutrol (Gadavist, BAY86-4875)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered a single dose of gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (bw) via i.v. (intravenous) bolus administration using a power injector via a peripheral vein (an antecubital vein was preferred). Gadobutrol was injected at a rate of 2 mL/second followed by a 20-mL 0.9% saline flush at the same rate.
Interventions
Gadobutrol single injection 0.1 mmol/kg BW via IV bolus administration at 2mL/sec.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred for contrast enhanced MRI of the CNS based on symptoms or previous procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with acute renal insufficiency
- Patients with severe renal disease
- Patients with any contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bayerlead
Study Sites (37)
HOPE Research Institute, LLC
Phoenix, Arizona, 85050, United States
Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States
Radiology Ltd.
Tucson, Arizona, 85711, United States
Landmark Imaging Medical Group
Los Angeles, California, 90025, United States
Cedars- Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Sharp & Children's MRI Center
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
University of Florida - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
River Birch Research Alliance, LLC
Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513, United States
Eisenhower Army Medical Center
Fort Gordon, Georgia, 30905, United States
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5302, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Bio-Magnetic Resonance, Inc.
Madison Heights, Michigan, 48071, United States
Maimonides Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11219, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Investigaciones Médicas
Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, C1082A, Argentina
Milbet Diagnostico por Imagenes
Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, C1115AAB, Argentina
Hospital Italiano Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, C1181ACH, Argentina
Centro de Diagnóstico Dr. Enrique Rossi
Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, C1425BEE, Argentina
Zhongda Hosp. affiliated of Southeast Univ.
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China
The 1st Affiliated Hosp of the 4th Military Med Uni
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
Chinese PLA General Hosp.
Beijing, 100853, China
Affiliated Ruijin Hosp. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. Med School
Shanghai, 200025, China
Fudan University Huashan Hospital
Shanghai, 200040, China
Fundación Instituto de Alta tecnología médica de Antioquia
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá - Hospital Universitario
Bogotá, Cundinamarca, Colombia
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul, Korea, 110-744, South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-799, South Korea
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- BAYER
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bayer Study Director
Bayer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2008
First Posted
February 26, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 10, 2014
Results First Posted
October 6, 2011
Record last verified: 2014-01