Functional Neuroimaging Effects of Cognitive Remediation Training
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine behavioral and functional brain changes occuring as a result of cognitive remediation training in patients with schizophrenia. Extension and specificity of related changes will also be examined.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 schizophrenia
Started Mar 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2007
CompletedMay 4, 2018
May 1, 2018
2 years
May 30, 2007
May 1, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Working Memory performance
N-Back Performance
Post-test
Brain activation
Changes in prefrontal cortical functioning
Post-test
Study Arms (3)
Patients: Cognitive Remediation
EXPERIMENTALPatients in the cognitive REM condition attended up to 25 h of training in small groups over 4-6 weeks based on the approach to cognitive remediation described by Wexler and Bell (2005). Patients performed tasks designed to train attention and memory from the battery available within a computerized software package (CogPack Marker Software). This training protocol has been shown to improve memory and executive functioning in patients with schizophrenia (Sartory et al, 2005) and tasks chosen were designed to produce improved working memory and attention capacity in the treated group. In addition, patients in the REM group trained on the word N-back one to two times a week and on N-back tasks using a variety of other stimuli (such as faces) one to two times a week to support the generalization of working memory improvements.
Patients: Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the CBSST group also attended up to 25 h of treatment but followed a manualized group therapy protocol (Granholm et al, 2005) using cognitive and behavioral therapy methods to increase patients' skills in symptom recognition, communication, problem solving, and relapse prevention. In both conditions, the facilitators interacted with the clients throughout small group (B4 patients) sessions: in the REM group, this mostly involved brief one-on-one discussions regarding task performance; in the CBSST condition, this interaction was in the context of the group milieu.
Controls: Retest control group
OTHEREstimate of normal brain functioning and retest effects
Interventions
Pre/Post test performance and neuroimaging only
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
- Stable outpatient
You may not qualify if:
- Current drug abuse or dependence
- History of neurological damage, disorder, or disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Minnesotalead
- Minnesota Medical Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Related Publications (1)
Haut KM, Lim KO, MacDonald A 3rd. Prefrontal cortical changes following cognitive training in patients with chronic schizophrenia: effects of practice, generalization, and specificity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Aug;35(9):1850-9. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.52. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PMID: 20428109RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Angus W MacDonald, Ph.D.
University of Minnesota
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kelvin O Lim, Ph.D.
University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants were randomized to computer-based cognitive training or active social-skills groups. Healthy controls (n=9) received no treatment.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2007
First Posted
June 1, 2007
Study Start
March 1, 2005
Primary Completion
February 28, 2007
Study Completion
February 28, 2007
Last Updated
May 4, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share