NCT01173874

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that cognitive remediation will be superior to the active control group on the change from baseline to study end point of cognitive remediation phase on both co-primary outcome measures (standardized composite MATRICS score and Cognitive Assessment Interview).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 schizophrenia

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_3 schizophrenia

Geographic Reach
1 country

16 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2010

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 8, 2010

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2010

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2013

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 11, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 11, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

July 8, 2010

Results QC Date

November 1, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 28, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

CognitionFunctionAttentionVigilanceVerbal MemoryVisual MemoryProcessing SpeedProblem SolvingSocial Cognition

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Cognitive Function Measured by MCCB Composite Score

    The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) will be used to assess cognitive function. The MCCB composite score is comprised of sub-scale measures of: a) working memory; b) attention and vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) speed of processing; f) reason and problem solving; and g) social cognition. The MCCB takes 90 minutes or less to complete. MCCB assessed 4 times: prestabilization (screening), randomization (after 6-8 weeks of lurasidone stabilization, prior to initial cognitive remediation), midpoint (after 20 cognitive remediation session), and study completion (final visit after 30 cognitive remediation sessions). MCCB composite scores are reported as t-scores where a t-score = 50 is the population average. Every 10 points is one standard deviation. There is no range as scores are as far from population average.

    4-6 month period

  • Cognitive Function as Measured by the University of California, San Diego, Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B) Scale

    The UPSA-B assesses functional capacity to perform tasks similar to those in daily life. Raw scores are converted into scaled scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better functional capacity.

    4-6 month period

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Cognition as Measured by Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI)

    4-6 month period

  • Efficacy as Measured by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

    4-6 month period

Study Arms (2)

Cognitive Remediation

EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive remediation intervention will be administered in small group settings twice weekly for 30 sessions and will utilize computerized and verbal group training exercises to address basic skills such as auditory processing, attention, processing speed, and verbal working memory and learning, as well as intermediate and complex skills such as deductive reasoning, planning and sequencing, set shifting, and complex problem solving.

Drug: Cognitive Remediation

Cognitive activity control group

NO INTERVENTION

This is a non-specific mental activity control condition, conducted two times per week for a total of 30 sessions.

Interventions

Cognitive remediation intervention will be administered in small group settings twice weekly for 30 sessions and will utilize computerized and verbal group training exercises to address basic skills such as auditory processing, attention, processing speed, and verbal working memory and learning, as well as intermediate and complex skills such as deductive reasoning, planning and sequencing, set shifting, and complex problem solving.

Cognitive Remediation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female between 18-55 years of age who meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Clinical trial version (SCID-CT version). Duration of illness \> 1 year. Outpatient status.
  • Change in antipsychotic medication is clinically warranted as evidenced by
  • persistent psychosis despite adequate dose and duration of antipsychotic, or \* inability to achieve therapeutic dose because of dose-limiting side effects,
  • persistent side effects that either cause significant subjective distress or significantly increase medical risks, such as substantial weight gain or metabolic disturbances, or
  • patient preference to switch and treating psychiatrist is in agreement.
  • No behaviors suggesting potential danger to self or others over the 6 months prior to participation.
  • For the last 2 weeks of lurasidone stabilization phase, a score of 4 or less on PANSS items of conceptual disorganization, hallucinations, suspiciousness and unusual thought content items.
  • At end of lurasidone stabilization phase, Simpson-Angus Scale total score \<
  • At end of lurasidone stabilization phase, Calgary Depression Scale total score \<10.
  • No acute medical problems; any chronic medical condition (e.g. hypertension) consistently treated and stable during the 1 month prior to participation.
  • Able to provide signed informed consent and to cooperate with all study procedures.
  • Able to attend twice weekly sessions (each lasting approximately 75 minutes) for cognitive remediation or active control sessions for the \~6 month duration of the cognitive remediation phase of the study.
  • Must meet the following cognitive performance criteria:
  • Able to complete the baseline MATRICS validly at baseline as assessed by NP tester.
  • Raw score of 12 or greater on the WTAR (Wechsler Test of Adult Reading) at screening.
  • +1 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Documented history of learning disability.
  • Hearing or visual impairment; not fluent in English.
  • Current treatment with clozapine or history of treatment resistance as evidenced by failure to improve (in the judgment of the investigator) with 2 or more adequate dose antipsychotic trials of at least 6 weeks duration in preceding 1 year.
  • Concomitant or anticipated treatment with potent CYP 3A4 inhibitor such a cimetidine, cyclosporine, erythromycin or erythromycin-like drugs (e.g., azithromycin, clarithromycin except short term acute treatment for 1 week or less), diltiazem, itraconazole, ketoconazole or other systemic antifungal agents in the azole class, nefazodone; or potent CYP3A4 inducer including: carbamazepine, modafinil, Phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampin, St. Johns Wort, and troglitazone.
  • Current treatment with psychotropic agents known to affect cognition such as amphetamines, topiramate.
  • History of treatment with electroconvulsive therapy within the 6 months prior to participation or expectation that patient may require ECT during the study.
  • History of neurological or neuropsychiatric conditions (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc).
  • A positive test for Hepatitis C antibody with concurrent evidence of impaired hepatic function (increased AST or ALT greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal) or positive tests for Hepatitis A antibody IgM fraction or Hepatitis B surface antigen, irrespective of the AST or ALT values.
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence during the 6 months prior to participation.
  • Participation in a clinical trial involving an investigational medication within 3 months prior to participation or 2 or more investigational drug trials in the preceding 12 months.
  • Pregnant women or women of child-bearing potential who are not using adequate birth control.
  • Woman who are breast feeding.
  • Individuals who: a) received any cognitive remediation in the 6 months prior to study entry or b)received more than 6 hours of cognitive remediation in the 12 months prior to study entry or c) received more than 15 hours in the 24 months prior to study entry. Cognitive remediation is defined as any behavioral intervention consisting of training activities that aim to target impairments in cognitive domains of sensory processing, attention, memory, processing speed, working memory, and executive functioning.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (16)

San Fernando Mental Health Center

Granada Hills, California, 91344, United States

Location

University of California - Irvine

Orange, California, 92868, United States

Location

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States

Location

University of Miami Department of Psychiatry

Miami, Florida, 33136, United States

Location

Medical College of Georgia

Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States

Location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Rush University Psychiatric Clinical Research Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46222, United States

Location

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55454, United States

Location

University of Missouri

Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States

Location

Columbia University

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Psychopharmacology Research Unit- Nathan KIine Institute for Psychiatric Research

New York, New York, 10035, United States

Location

Duke University Medical Center

Butner, North Carolina, 27509, United States

Location

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States

Location

University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Related Publications (40)

  • Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1736359.

    PMID: 1736359BACKGROUND
  • Bruder GE, Wexler BE, Sage MM, Gil RB, Gorman JM. Verbal memory in schizophrenia: additional evidence of subtypes having different cognitive deficits. Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):137-47. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00156-7.

    PMID: 15099598BACKGROUND
  • Carter CS, Perlstein W, Ganguli R, Brar J, Mintun M, Cohen JD. Functional hypofrontality and working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;155(9):1285-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.9.1285.

    PMID: 9734557BACKGROUND
  • Davidson M, Galderisi S, Weiser M, Werbeloff N, Fleischhacker WW, Keefe RS, Boter H, Keet IP, Prelipceanu D, Rybakowski JK, Libiger J, Hummer M, Dollfus S, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Hranov LG, Gaebel W, Peuskens J, Lindefors N, Riecher-Rossler A, Kahn RS. Cognitive effects of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: a randomized, open-label clinical trial (EUFEST). Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;166(6):675-82. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08060806. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

    PMID: 19369319BACKGROUND
  • Elger CE, Grunwald T, Lehnertz K, Kutas M, Helmstaedter C, Brockhaus A, Van Roost D, Heinze HJ. Human temporal lobe potentials in verbal learning and memory processes. Neuropsychologia. 1997 May;35(5):657-67. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00110-8.

    PMID: 9153028BACKGROUND
  • Fisher M, Holland C, Merzenich MM, Vinogradov S. Using neuroplasticity-based auditory training to improve verbal memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;166(7):805-11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08050757. Epub 2009 May 15.

    PMID: 19448187BACKGROUND
  • Goldman-Rakic PS. The physiological approach: functional architecture of working memory and disordered cognition in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Sep 1;46(5):650-61. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00130-4.

    PMID: 10472417BACKGROUND
  • Goldman-Rakic PS. Working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994 Fall;6(4):348-57. doi: 10.1176/jnp.6.4.348.

    PMID: 7841806BACKGROUND
  • Green MF, Kern RS, Heaton RK. Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009.

    PMID: 15531406BACKGROUND
  • Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;153(3):321-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321.

    PMID: 8610818BACKGROUND
  • Gur RE, Jaggi JL, Shtasel DL, Ragland JD, Gur RC. Cerebral blood flow in schizophrenia: effects of memory processing on regional activation. Biol Psychiatry. 1994 Jan 1;35(1):3-15. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)91160-6.

    PMID: 8167200BACKGROUND
  • Kayser J, Bruder GE, Friedman D, Tenke CE, Amador XF, Clark SC, Malaspina D, Gorman JM. Brain event-related potentials (ERPs) in schizophrenia during a word recognition memory task. Int J Psychophysiol. 1999 Dec;34(3):249-65. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(99)00082-3.

    PMID: 10610049BACKGROUND
  • Kayser J, Tenke CE. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):348-68. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.034. Epub 2005 Dec 13.

    PMID: 16356767BACKGROUND
  • Kayser J, Tenke CE. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):369-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.033. Epub 2005 Dec 13.

    PMID: 16356768BACKGROUND
  • Kayser J, Tenke CE, Gates NA, Kroppmann CJ, Gil RB, Bruder GE. ERP/CSD indices of impaired verbal working memory subprocesses in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology. 2006 May;43(3):237-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00398.x.

    PMID: 16805862BACKGROUND
  • Kayser J, Tenke CE, Gates NA, Bruder GE. Reference-independent ERP old/new effects of auditory and visual word recognition memory: Joint extraction of stimulus- and response-locked neuronal generator patterns. Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):949-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00562.x. Epub 2007 Jul 19.

    PMID: 17640266BACKGROUND
  • Sambataro F, Reed JD, Murty VP, Das S, Tan HY, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR, Mattay VS. Catechol-O-methyltransferase valine(158)methionine polymorphism modulates brain networks underlying working memory across adulthood. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Sep 15;66(6):540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.014. Epub 2009 Jun 17.

    PMID: 19539269BACKGROUND
  • McGurk SR, Twamley EW, Sitzer DI, McHugo GJ, Mueser KT. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;164(12):1791-802. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060906.

    PMID: 18056233BACKGROUND
  • McMahon RP, Arndt S, Conley RR. More powerful two-sample tests for differences in repeated measures of adverse effects in psychiatric trials when only some patients may be at risk. Stat Med. 2005 Jan 15;24(1):11-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.1837.

    PMID: 15515151BACKGROUND
  • Mozley LH, Gur RC, Gur RE, Mozley PD, Alavi A. Relationships between verbal memory performance and the cerebral distribution of fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1996 Sep 15;40(6):443-51. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00421-1.

    PMID: 8879463BACKGROUND
  • Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-25. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1058.

    PMID: 11747097BACKGROUND
  • Nuechterlein KH, Barch DM, Gold JM, Goldberg TE, Green MF, Heaton RK. Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.007.

    PMID: 15531405BACKGROUND
  • Park S, Holzman PS. Schizophrenics show spatial working memory deficits. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;49(12):975-82. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820120063009.

    PMID: 1449384BACKGROUND
  • Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):184-7. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6.

    PMID: 2464490BACKGROUND
  • Ragland JD, Gur RC, Raz J, Schroeder L, Kohler CG, Smith RJ, Alavi A, Gur RE. Effect of schizophrenia on frontotemporal activity during word encoding and recognition: a PET cerebral blood flow study. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;158(7):1114-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1114.

    PMID: 11431234BACKGROUND
  • Saykin AJ, Gur RC, Gur RE, Mozley PD, Mozley LH, Resnick SM, Kester DB, Stafiniak P. Neuropsychological function in schizophrenia. Selective impairment in memory and learning. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;48(7):618-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810310036007.

    PMID: 2069492BACKGROUND
  • Weinberger DR, Egan MF, Bertolino A, Callicott JH, Mattay VS, Lipska BK, Berman KF, Goldberg TE. Prefrontal neurons and the genetics of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Dec 1;50(11):825-44. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01252-5.

    PMID: 11743939BACKGROUND
  • Wexler BE, Stevens AA, Bowers AA, Sernyak MJ, Goldman-Rakic PS. Word and tone working memory deficits in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;55(12):1093-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.12.1093.

    PMID: 9862552BACKGROUND
  • Wykes T, Brammer M, Mellers J, Bray P, Reeder C, Williams C, Corner J. Effects on the brain of a psychological treatment: cognitive remediation therapy: functional magnetic resonance imaging in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;181:144-52. doi: 10.1017/s0007125000161872.

    PMID: 12151286BACKGROUND
  • Westfall PH. 1997. Multiple testing of general contrasts using logical constraints and correlations, J Am Stat Assoc, 92; 299-306.

    BACKGROUND
  • Westfall PH, Tobias RD, Rom D, Wolfinger RD, Hochberg Y. Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using the SAS7 system, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary NC, pp. 149-175, 335-343, 1999.

    BACKGROUND
  • Schafer, JL. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data, New York: Chapman and Hall. 1997

    BACKGROUND
  • Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Egan MF, Kolachana B, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR. Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):6186-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931309100. Epub 2003 Apr 25.

    PMID: 12716966BACKGROUND
  • Little RJA, and Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Second Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2002.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cohen JD, Forman SD, Braver TS, Casey BJ, Servan-Schreiber D, Noll DC. Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;1(4):293-304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.460010407.

    PMID: 24591198BACKGROUND
  • Friedman D. ERPs during continuous recognition memory for words. Biol Psychol. 1990 Feb;30(1):61-87. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(90)90091-a.

    PMID: 2223937BACKGROUND
  • Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70, 1979.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kayser, J., Tenke, C.E. Consensus on PCA for ERP data, and sensibility of unrestricted solutions. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(3), 703-707. (2006c).

    BACKGROUND
  • Kantrowitz JT, Sharif Z, Medalia A, Keefe RS, Harvey P, Bruder G, Barch DM, Choo T, Lee S, Lieberman JA. A Multicenter, Rater-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study of Auditory Processing-Focused Cognitive Remediation Combined With Open-Label Lurasidone in Patients With Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;77(6):799-806. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m09998.

  • Roberts MT, Lloyd J, Valimaki M, Ho GW, Freemantle M, Bekefi AZ. Video games for people with schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD012844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012844.pub2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Interventions

Cognitive Remediation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Joshua Kantrowitz
Organization
New York State Psychiatric Institute

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey Lieberman, M.D.

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Zafar Sharif, M.D.

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2010

First Posted

August 2, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion

October 1, 2013

Study Completion

November 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 11, 2017

Results First Posted

April 11, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations