A Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
A Randomized, Multi-centre, Double-blind Study, to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
2 other identifiers
interventional
583
17 countries
77
Brief Summary
This is a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study using a flexible dosing regime to allow optimal zonisamide or carbamazepine therapy for individual subjects. Assessment of eligibility will take place at the Screening Visit. The subjects will be randomized to either the carbamazepine or zonisamide arm at the Randomization Visit (T1). T1 must occur as soon as possible (and at least within 14 days) of the Screening Visit in order to optimize subject care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started May 2007
Typical duration for phase_3
77 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 8, 2013
CompletedDecember 24, 2015
November 1, 2015
3.6 years
May 21, 2007
November 12, 2012
December 21, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance Phase
A subject achieved a 26-week seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 26 weeks while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Week 31 through Week 109
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 12-months During the FDP and Maintenance Period
Week 5 through Week 109
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
Week 1 through Week 109
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to Lack of Efficacy
Week 1 through Week 109
Time to 6-months Seizure Freedom
Week 5 through Week 83
Time to 12-months Seizure Freedom
Week 5 through Week 83
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Zonisamide
ACTIVE COMPARATORCarbamazepine
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.
Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects, 18 to 75 years of age inclusive.
- Subjects with untreated, newly diagnosed epilepsy having at least two well documented, unprovoked, clinically evaluated and classified partial seizures (with or without secondary generalization) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (without clear focal origin) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, of which at least one seizure occurred within three months of the Screening Visit (\> one seizure within a 24 hour period will be counted as one seizure).
- Subjects will either have had no previous use of an AED, or treatment with one AED for a maximum duration of two weeks before the Randomization Visit (T1).
- Subjects have a documented electroencephalogram (EEG) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, compatible with localization-related epilepsy (to exclude primary generalized epilepsy).
- Subjects have a documented computed axial tomography (CAT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan confirming the absence of a progressive neurological lesion within 12 months of the Screening Visit.
- Female subjects without childbearing potential (two years post-menopausal, bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation, complete hysterectomy) are eligible. Female subjects with childbearing potential must not be pregnant as confirmed by a negative pregnancy test at screening and randomization, must not be lactating and must be using a medically acceptable form of contraception, for the duration of the study and for one month following discontinuation of the study drug. Medically acceptable contraception is defined here as oral contraception pill with at least 50 micrograms ethinylestradiol per intake, contraceptive injections and implants, or intrauterine device in place for at least three months.
- Subjects who are able and willing to follow investigational study procedures, maintain a seizure diary, and report AEs.
- Subjects who are able and willing to give written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects have a history of clinical investigations, including EEG data, that are suggestive of idiopathic generalised epilepsy as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE).
- Subjects with a history of absence, myoclonic, clonic, tonic, or atonic seizures.
- Subjects have a history of status epilepticus, and/or non-epileptic seizures (e.g., metabolic, pseudo-seizures).
- Subjects have experienced seizures relating to drugs, alcohol, acute medical illness, mental retardation, or subjects with situation-related seizures.
- Subjects have progressive encephalopathy or findings consistent with progressive CNS disease or lesion (e.g. infection, demyelination, or tumour).
- Subjects have a history of a significant or currently uncontrolled disease that will interfere with the conduct of this study or the assessment of safety and efficacy of the study drug.
- Subjects have been previously treated with carbamazepine or zonisamide.
- Subjects have received an investigational drug or device in the three months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Subjects have a known hypersensitivity to sulfonamides, dibenzazepine derivatives, or tricyclic antidepressants.
- Subjects have a history of bone marrow depression, low platelet count or other blood dyscrasia.
- Subjects have a history of acute intermittent porphyria.
- Subjects have a history of renal disorder (serum creatinine level of \> 135 ìmol / l (1.5 mg/dL at the Screening Visit), hepatic disorder or clinically significant abnormal liver function tests; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2 times the upper normal limit.
- Subjects have a body weight of less than 40 kg.
- Subjects have a history of progressive malignancy within the previous 5 years (excluding a history of non-metastasized and adequately treated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma).
- Subjects have a history of psychiatric illness or mood disorder requiring electro-convulsive or drug therapy within the previous 6 months which is considered uncontrolled; a history of suicide attempt; alcohol or drug abuse; chronic treatment with benzodiazepines or barbiturates.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eisai Inc.lead
Study Sites (79)
Unknown Facility
Camperdown, Australia
Unknown Facility
Clayton, Australia
Unknown Facility
Fitzroy, Australia
Unknown Facility
Flinders, Australia
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg West, Australia
Unknown Facility
Parkville, Australia
Unknown Facility
Queensland, Australia
Unknown Facility
Wellington, Australia
Unknown Facility
Aalborg, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Béthune, France
Unknown Facility
Dijon, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Saint-Etienne, France
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bochum, Germany
Unknown Facility
Düsseldorf, Germany
Unknown Facility
Munich, Germany
Unknown Facility
Schwerin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Westerstede, Germany
Unknown Facility
Athens, Greece
Unknown Facility
Thessaloniki, Greece
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Debrecen, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gyula, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Nyregyhaza, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Zalaegerszeg-Pozva, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, India
Unknown Facility
Hyderabad, India
Unknown Facility
Koturpuram, India
Unknown Facility
Madurai, India
Unknown Facility
New Delhi, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, India
Unknown Facility
Milan, Italy
Unknown Facility
Monza, Italy
Unknown Facility
Orbassano, Italy
Unknown Facility
Rome, Italy
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Poland
Unknown Facility
Katowice, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Sosnowiec, Poland
Unknown Facility
Szcecin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Kaliningrad, Russia
Unknown Facility
Kazan', Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yaroslavl, Russia
Unknown Facility
Belgrade, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Niš, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Novi Sad, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Subotica, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Bratslava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Brezno, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Nové Zámky, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Vranov nad Topľou, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Žilina, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Sandton, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Anyang, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Wŏnju, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Alicante, Spain
Unknown Facility
Bacelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Málaga, Spain
Unknown Facility
Oviedo, Spain
Unknown Facility
Seville, Spain
Unknown Facility
Gothenburg, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Lund, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Changhua, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Yongkang District, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Bristol, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Liverpool, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Treliske, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Baulac M, Brodie MJ, Patten A, Segieth J, Giorgi L. Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jul;11(7):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70105-9. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PMID: 22683226DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Eisai Inc.
- Organization
- Eisai Call Center
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joanna Segieth
Eisai Limited
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2007
First Posted
May 23, 2007
Study Start
May 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 24, 2015
Results First Posted
February 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2015-11