Study Stopped
TRIAL STOPPED due to a change in standard of care and the required patient numbers could no longer be achieved
Velcade (Bortezomib), Adriamycin Dexamethasone (PAD) or Vincristine Adriamycin Dexamethasone in Second Line Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 2, Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Velcade When Added to Adriamycin-Dexamethasone Treatment Versus Vincristine-Adriamycin-Dexamethasone Standard Treatment in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Refractory to or Have Relapsed After Primary Therapy for Multiple Myeloma
3 other identifiers
interventional
30
7 countries
16
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and effectiveness of replacing vincristine with a drug called bortezomib (also known as "Velcade"or PS341) in the standard therapy vincristine, doxorubicin (not limited to, but formerly referred to under the tradename Adriamycin) and dexamethasone (VAD) in patients with multiple myeloma. Multiple Myeloma is the second most common cancer of the blood. Bortezomib is the first approved cancer treatment in a new class of medicines called proteasome inhibitors. It disrupts the cell cycle of the cell, affecting numerous biologic pathways, including those related to growth and survival of cancer cells. The treatment will be used as second line treatment, which means either the disease has returned after a period of improvement (relapse) or the disease did not respond to the initial treatment (refractory). Patients will receive either bortezomib (PS341), doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and dexamethasone (PAD) or the VAD standard therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 multiple-myeloma
Started Dec 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 multiple-myeloma
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 21, 2014
CompletedMarch 21, 2014
February 1, 2014
1.1 years
February 27, 2007
December 3, 2009
February 20, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Best Confirmed Disease Response
The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria as assessed by the investigator. The best confirmed response was defined as 2 separate and consecutive evaluations of response, at least 6 weeks apart (for progressive disease \[PD\], 1 to 3 weeks apart). The ordering of the responses was: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), no change (NC) and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.
every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
Best Reported Disease Response
The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the EBMT criteria as assessed by the investigator. The ordering of the responses was: CR, PR, MR, NC and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.
every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Duration of Response (DOR)
every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
Study Arms (2)
VAD Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORvincristine in combination with adriamycin and dexamethasone
PAD Treatment
EXPERIMENTALbortezomib in combination with adriamycin and dexamethasone
Interventions
dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma following 1 previous line of therapy and, is scheduled by the investigator to be treated with vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone standard therapy
- measurable secretory multiple myeloma based on defined criteria
- Karnofsky performance status of \>or = 60%
- fulfils defined laboratory requirements within 14 days before baseline
- if female, the patient is either postmenopausal or surgically sterilised or willing to use an acceptable method of birth control for defined period of time
- if male, the patient agrees to use an acceptable barrier method for contraception for a defined period of time.
You may not qualify if:
- More than one previous line of therapy for multiple myeloma
- use of bortezomib in the previous line of therapy and/or received bortezomib in a previous trial
- known allergy or hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron or mannitol
- peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain of grade 2 or higher
- myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrollment or had New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (16)
Unknown Facility
Zagreb, Croatia
Unknown Facility
Leer, Germany
Unknown Facility
Velbert, Germany
Unknown Facility
Debrecen, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Kaunas, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Klaipėda, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Samara, Russia
Unknown Facility
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Eskişehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to a substantial decline in the use of the VAD regimen as standard of care, recruitment of the study was halted at 30 subjects. It was not possible to statistically evaluate any long term efficacy parameter.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- EMEA Medical Affairs Director Oncology
- Organization
- Jan-Cilag Germany
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen-Cilag International NV Clinical Trial
Janssen-Cilag International NV
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2007
First Posted
February 28, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 1, 2008
Study Completion
January 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 21, 2014
Results First Posted
March 21, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02