Capecitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Capecitabine
Randomized Phase III Trial With Capecitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine/Erlotinib Followed of Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
280
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This crossover trial is performed in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer not previously exposed to chemotherapy. The study compares a standard arm with gemcitabine plus erlotinib to an experimental arm with capecitabine plus erlotinib. It is the first trial of its kind to incorporate second-line treatment into the study design. Patient who fail on first-line therapy are switched to the comparator chemotherapy without erlotinib. The trial therefore not only compares two different regimens of first-line treatment, it also compares two sequential treatment strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 pancreatic-cancer
Started Jun 2006
Typical duration for phase_3 pancreatic-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedJuly 9, 2012
July 1, 2012
5.5 years
February 22, 2007
July 5, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
TTF2
Time to treatment failure, after 2nd line (crossover) therapy
approximate 6 months after first line treatment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
TTF1
approximate 6 months after randomization
Remission Rate
approximate 6 months after randomization
Overall Survival
42 months after randomization
Clinical Benefit Response
approximate 6 months after randomization
Tumor marker CA19-9 characteristics
approximate 6 months after randomization
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm B
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Capecitabine 2 x 1000 mg/m²/ d oral, d 1 - 14 followed by 7 days Pause ("Flat Dosing")
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 75 years
- Histologically proven pancreatic cancer stage III or IV (T1-3 N1M0 or T1 3N0 1M1)
- No option for resection with curative intent
- At least one measurable or not measurable lesion (according to RECIST)
- No previous chemotherapy or other systemic tumor therapy
- No previous radiation
- Performance-Status 0-2 according to WHO/ECOG
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months
- Adequate kidney-, liver- and bone marrow function, defined as
- Absolute neutrophil count \* 1,5 x 109/l
- Hemoglobin \* 8 g/dl
- Thrombocytes \* 100 x 109/l
- Bilirubin \* 2 x upper norm (with liver mets \< 5-fold)
- Serum Creatinine \* 1,25 x upper norm
- Creatinine clearance \> 30 ml/min (Cockroft/Gault)
- +4 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Known secondary cancer other than curatively treated basalioma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri
- Clinically unstable CNS-metastases
- Known hypersensitivity against study medication
- Severe impairment of renal function (creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min)
- Severe impairment of liver function (bilirubin \> 2,0 x above upper norm, transaminases \> 2,5 x upper norm, or with known liver metastasis \>5 x upper norm)
- Clinically relevant disease of the cardiovascular system or other vital organs
- Known polyneuropathy
- Known DPD-deficiency (screening not required)
- Simultaneous treatment with the antiviral agent sorivudin or chemically related agents such as brivudin
- Pregnancy, lactation or lack of reliable contraception in women at childbearing age
- Mental disease, drug- or alcohol abuse
- Participation in another clinical trial within the last 4 weeks
- All other diseases which may prevent adequate participation in the trial
- Indication of lack of compliance with study regulations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- PD Dr. med. Volker Heinemannlead
- Roche Pharma AGcollaborator
Related Publications (5)
Weiss L, Heinemann V, Fischer LE, Gieseler F, Hoehler T, Mayerle J, Quietzsch D, Reinacher-Schick A, Schenk M, Seipelt G, Siveke JT, Stahl M, Vehling-Kaiser U, Waldschmidt DT, Dorman K, Zhang D, Westphalen CB, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Boeck S, Haas M. Three-month life expectancy as inclusion criterion for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic cancer: is it really a valid tool for patient selection? Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 May;26(5):1268-1272. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03323-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
PMID: 37794220DERIVEDGuenther M, Surendran SA, Haas M, Heinemann V, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Engel J, Werner J, Boeck S, Ormanns S. TPX2 expression as a negative predictor of gemcitabine efficacy in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2023 Jul;129(1):175-182. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02295-x. Epub 2023 May 4.
PMID: 37142730DERIVEDGuenther M, Haas M, Heinemann V, Kruger S, Westphalen CB, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Mayerle J, Werner J, Kirchner T, Boeck S, Ormanns S. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide as negative predictor of gemcitabine efficacy in advanced pancreatic cancer - translational results from the AIO-PK0104 Phase 3 study. Br J Cancer. 2020 Oct;123(9):1370-1376. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01029-7. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
PMID: 32830200DERIVEDOrmanns S, Siveke JT, Heinemann V, Haas M, Sipos B, Schlitter AM, Esposito I, Jung A, Laubender RP, Kruger S, Vehling-Kaiser U, Winkelmann C, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Clemens MR, Gauler TC, Marten A, Geissler M, Greten TF, Kirchner T, Boeck S. pERK, pAKT and p53 as tissue biomarkers in erlotinib-treated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a translational subgroup analysis from AIO-PK0104. BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 28;14:624. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-624.
PMID: 25164437DERIVEDHeinemann V, Vehling-Kaiser U, Waldschmidt D, Kettner E, Marten A, Winkelmann C, Klein S, Kojouharoff G, Gauler TC, von Weikersthal LF, Clemens MR, Geissler M, Greten TF, Hegewisch-Becker S, Rubanov O, Baake G, Hohler T, Ko YD, Jung A, Neugebauer S, Boeck S. Gemcitabine plus erlotinib followed by capecitabine versus capecitabine plus erlotinib followed by gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomised phase 3 trial of the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie' (AIO-PK0104). Gut. 2013 May;62(5):751-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302759. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
PMID: 22773551DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Volker Heinemann, MD
University of Munich - Klinikum Grosshadern
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Sponsor Delegatated Person
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2007
First Posted
February 26, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 9, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07