Improving the Quality of Patient Care by Using a Clinical Expert System.
CLEOS
Quality Assessment for History Taking With or Without an Knowledge Based Interview System.
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: To investigate the quality of history taking by physician and computer-based system. Patients: 100 inpatients presenting at the RBK for the first time and treated in the departments of nephrology and cardiology. Methods: The information obtained by the computer based system is compared with the information acquired by conventional history taking. Study endpoint is the comparison of historical data organized according to the elements in a standard medical history on a patient-by-patient basis. Study procedure History taking is performed by physicians according to the guidelines of the RBK. Within 2 days thereafter the patient is interviewed with help of the CLEOS system with the support of a study nurse.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hypertension
Started Aug 2005
Typical duration for not_applicable hypertension
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 18, 2015
CompletedDecember 18, 2015
November 1, 2015
3.3 years
January 31, 2007
September 24, 2010
November 15, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Detection of Medical Problems (by Number of Problems Reported by Computer Assisted History, That Were Not Reported by Physician Taken History)
Data were extracted from hospital charts by to experienced physicians.; data from the computer histories were extracted by a senior physician, who tabulated comparisons between the 2 sets of records. We used the number of problems reported by Computer Assisted History that were not reported by Physician. Nurses at Robert Bosch Krankenhaus do not take medical histories in regard to allergies or adverse drug reactions. Pharmacists make no entries into charts and have no separate records of drug allergies or history of adverse drug reactions. Data on these issues either are obtained only by physician interview of the patient.
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 8 days
Study Arms (1)
Inpatients of hospital
OTHERAll patients who were admitted to the departments of nephrology or cardiology in a tertiary hospital in Germany. The intervention was use of an expert system to acquire medical histories by direct interview of patients. Description of the software program - The program tested in this study consisted of a data acquisition \[history-taking\] component and a data analysis component. The data acquisition component was constructed on the basis of established principles of pathophysiology. Medical knowledge was formalized as software algorithms that were machine-readable by representing the knowledge as branched chain decision trees.
Interventions
Methods The intervention was use of an expert system to acquire medical histories by direct interview of patients. Description of the software program - The program tested in this study consisted of a data acquisition \[history-taking\] component and a data analysis component. The data acquisition component was constructed on the basis of established principles of pathophysiology. Medical knowledge was formalized as software algorithms that were machine-readable by representing the knowledge as branched chain decision trees.
Convential history taking by physicians
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All inpatients in a hospital environment
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give an informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Robert-Bosch-Hospital
Stuttgart, 70376, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof. Dr. Mark Dominik Alscher
- Organization
- Robert-Bosch-Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dominik M Alscher, MD
Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH (RBMF)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Medical Officer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2007
First Posted
February 2, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2005
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
December 18, 2015
Results First Posted
December 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11