Pharmacy Home Adherence Reporting and Monitoring Outcomes Study
PHARxMOS
Nudging Doctors to Collaborate With Pharmacists to Improve Medication Adherence
2 other identifiers
interventional
2,697
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a pilot test of an intervention that delivers timely diagnostic information about medication nonadherence to doctors, and then offers the services of clinical pharmacists to treat these nonadherence problems. Participating doctors will be notified when a patient is 10 days late refilling a medication for diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. In one randomization arm the pharmacist will contact the patient as the default option (with no action required by the doctor), and in the other the pharmacist will contact the patient only if the doctor actively chooses that the pharmacist take action. Patients of participating doctors will be randomized to 1) one of these two pharmacist options, 2) an information only control arm in which the doctor gets adherence information but does not have access to a pharmacist for that patient, and 3) a no information control arm. The investigators' central hypothesis is that the pharmacist will be consulted more often when intervention by the pharmacist is the default outcome and that the default pharmacist intervention will be the most beneficial for adherence outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable diabetes
Started Mar 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 11, 2022
CompletedJanuary 11, 2022
December 1, 2021
2.9 years
November 2, 2014
August 2, 2021
December 13, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Probability of Resolution of Nonadherence Within 30 Days
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which these patients have filled a prescription by 30 days. Outcome is 1 if the patient fills the prescription by 30 days (considered resolution of nonadherence); otherwise it is 0. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of nonadherence (NAE) events resolved within 30 days across all patients in each particular arm.
Outcome measure examines fills within 30 days of a nonadherence event. Participants were followed over a total of 6 months.
Duration of Nonadherence Event
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the duration of nonadherence event (the length of time the patient took to refill a prescription if the refill had been late), in days.
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Probability of Physician Viewing Nonadherence Event Information
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Probability of Pharmacist Action Triggered
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Study Arms (11)
Default patient default doctor
EXPERIMENTALPatient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call
Information patient default doctor
EXPERIMENTALPatient nonadherence information sent to physician
Control patient default doctor
NO INTERVENTIONControl - no intervention
Choice patient choice doctor
EXPERIMENTALPatient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call
Information patient choice doctor
EXPERIMENTALPatient nonadherence information sent to physician
Control patient choice doctor
NO INTERVENTIONControl - no intervention
Information patient information doctor
EXPERIMENTALPatient nonadherence information sent to physician
Control patient information doctor
NO INTERVENTIONControl - no intervention
Information doctor
EXPERIMENTALPhysician receives nonadherence information, but there is no opportunity for pharmacist action
Choice doctor
EXPERIMENTALPhysician receives nonadherence information, and can choose to request pharmacist action
Default doctor
EXPERIMENTALPhysician receives nonadherence information; pharmacist action will be triggered unless physician cancels action
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- New England Quality Care Alliance (NEQCA) primary care physicians of adult patients insured through large commercial insurer partner
- Adult patients of consented New England Quality Care Alliance (NEQCA) primary care physicians
- Insured through large commercial insurer partner
- Prescribed chronic medications for one or more of the three study conditions in the past six months
- On the insurer's "do not contact" list
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brown Universitylead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
- Tufts Medical Centercollaborator
- Harvard Universitycollaborator
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island, 02913, United States
Related Publications (1)
McConnell M, Rogers W, Simeonova E, Wilson IB. Architecting Process of Care: A randomized controlled study evaluating the impact of providing nonadherence information and pharmacist assistance to physicians. Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb;55(1):136-145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13243. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
PMID: 31835278DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
We partnered with only one insurer and pharmacy benefit manager and therefore had information on adherence for a subset of any physician's patients. We only had information on selected medications. We could only track patient outcomes related to adherence. Few patients actually received the pharmacist intervention. A relatively high share of patients opted out of the research. Our multilevel experimental design, with randomization occurring at both patient and physician levels, was complex.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Joanne Michaud
- Organization
- Brown University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ira B Wilson, MD, MSc
Brown University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2014
First Posted
December 3, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 11, 2022
Results First Posted
January 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share