Study Stopped
The perceived risk-benefit ratio for individuals with early active RA
Rituximab for the Treatment of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
An Open Label, Single Arm, Single Center, Phase I/II Trial of Rituximab (a Monoclonal Antibody to CD20) for the Treatment of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling, pain, stiffness, damage, and ultimately loss of joint function. Scientists estimate that about 1.3 million people (0.6 percent) of the U.S. adult population have RA. Current therapies target the immune system early in the disease process before joint damage occurs, and include drugs such as methotrexate (MTX) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking agents. Rituximab is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) recently approved by the FDA for use in combination with MTX for treatment of moderately to severely active RA in patients who have had an inadequate response to TNF-blocking agents, in an effort to try to slow the course of the disease. This study will examine the effects of rituximab on the immune response and disease activity in participants with early RA who have not been treated with any disease-modifying agent. In addition, the safety and tolerability of rituximab in this population will be examined.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Nov 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_1 rheumatoid-arthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 14, 2012
CompletedFebruary 12, 2013
February 1, 2013
2.7 years
November 6, 2006
October 11, 2012
February 6, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 48
The DAS28-ESR is a score on a scale (0 to 10) that is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR (mm/hour). Lower score indicates less disease activity. Flares in disease activity are defined as an increase in this score of greater than 1.2 and remission is defined as achieving a DAS28-ESR score of less than 2.6.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Score at Week 48
Tender Joint Count (TJC) is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from baseline is computed as Week 48 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 48
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as Week 48 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 48
Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 millimeters visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity- Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 48
Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 millimeters visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Patient's Disease Activity- Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 48
Change from Baseline in PhGADA-VAS (0 to 100 millimeters visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Health Component Summary Scores (PCS and MCS) at Week 48
SF-36 measures health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores: PCS=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; MCS=vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For both, 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the baseline value. A positive value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a negative value worsening.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 48
HAQ-DI is derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living activities (using 20 questions). Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). In addition, category scores are modified if an aid or device is used, for example, a walker or wheelchair, or help is received from another person in the daily living activities. If an aid or device is used or help is received then a category score of 0 or 1 increases to a category score of 2. A category score of 3 remains a 3 regardless of aids, devices, or help. Scores from each of the 8 categories are totaled. The total score can range from 0 to 24. Change from baseline is computed as the total score at Week 48 minus the baseline total score. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 48
ESR is a blood test used to monitor therapy in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and reflects acute phase reactant levels. Active disease in RA is defined by an ESR greater than 30 mm/hr. Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline (Day 0), Week 48
Study Arms (1)
Rituximab
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Participants to receive an intravenous infusion of rituximab (1 gram ) fourteen days apart, at baseline (Day 0) and at Week 2. Concomitant treatments to be administered at a dose and frequency prescribed per protocol include methotrexate (MTX) and folic or folinic acid.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of RA, as defined by fulfilling at least four of seven American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Positive for rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anticyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP)
- The presence of arthritis symptoms for more than 6 weeks but less than 1 year
- Active RA, as defined by at least four swollen joints, at least four tender joints, and either an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of greater than 30 mm/hr OR C-reactive protein level greater than 1.0 mg/dL (normal less than 0.4)
- Willing to adhere to the study requirements
- Willing to use acceptable effective forms of contraception
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to methotrexate (MTX)
- Previous exposure to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) or other type(s) of mAb therapy
- Previous disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) therapy
- Previous use of a biologic agent
- Currently taking daily oral steroid doses of greater than 7.5 milligrams (mg)
- Receipt of intra-articular injections within 4 weeks prior to study entry
- Current peptic ulcer disease (PUD)
- Unwilling to stop drinking alcohol (ETOH)
- History of alcohol or substance abuse
- Active infection, or chronic or persistent infection that might worsen with immunosuppressive treatment (e.g., Human Immunodeficiency Virus \[HIV\], hepatitis B virus \[HBV\], hepatitis C virus \[HCV\], tuberculosis \[TB\])
- Interstitial lung disease observed by chest x-ray \[chest radiograph\]
- Known coronary artery disease or significant cardiac arrhythmias or severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] classes III or IV)
- Definitive diagnosis of another autoimmune rheumatologic disease (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus \[SLE\], scleroderma, primary Sjögren's syndrome, primary vasculitis)
- History of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated or non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity or known anaphylaxis to mouse proteins
- History of cancer. Exception: participants with previous resected basal or squamous cell carcinoma, treated cervical dysplasia, or treated in situ Grade I cervical cancer within 5 years prior to study entry are not excluded from study eligibility
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Denver, Colorado, 80262, United States
Related Publications (4)
De Vita S, Quartuccio L. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with rituximab: an update and possible indications. Autoimmun Rev. 2006 Aug;5(7):443-8. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
PMID: 16920570BACKGROUNDEisenberg R, Albert D. B-cell targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006 Jan;2(1):20-7. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0042.
PMID: 16932648BACKGROUNDIsenberg DA. B cell targeted therapies in autoimmune diseases. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2006 May;77:24-8.
PMID: 16652442BACKGROUNDLooney RJ. B cell-targeted therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: an update on the evidence. Drugs. 2006;66(5):625-39. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666050-00004.
PMID: 16620141BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The trial terminated early due to rituximab's risk-benefit ratio for individuals with early active Rheumatoid Arthritis. Mechanistic samples were not processed and corresponding endpoints were not assessed. Only descriptive statistics are presented.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Associate Director, Clinical Research Program
- Organization
- DAIT/NIAID
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Christopher Striebich, MD, PhD
Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert D. D'Ambrosia, MD
Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2006
First Posted
November 8, 2006
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
July 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 12, 2013
Results First Posted
November 14, 2012
Record last verified: 2013-02